Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Intercropping of Chilli with Carrot and Radish in Prayagraj Agro-climatic Conditions

Kartikey Tiwari; Devi Singh

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment entitled “Intercropping of Chilli with Carrot and Radish in Prayagraj Agro- climatic Conditions” was conducted from November 2021 to March 2022 at the Horticulture Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj. This Experiment was laid out in randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications and 08 treatments. The experiment consisted of six cropping combinations which are, Sole chilli, sole carrot, sole radish, chilli + carrot, chilli+ radish, chilli + carrot + radish. The highest yield (green chilli) was obtained on the treatment T1 (sole chilli @100 % RDF) (13.09 t ha-1). Among the intercropping treatments, the highest chilli yield (12.68 t ha-1) was obtained from the treatment T6 (chilli @ 70% RDF + carrot @ 30% RDF) whereas the lowest yield (10.57 t ha-1) was found in treatment T8 (chilli @ 60% RDF + carrot @ 20% RDF + radish @ 20% RDF). Intercropping reduced the chilli yield, but the total chilli with intercrops yield increased over the sole chilli. Due to the contribution of companion crops. The highest chilli yield along with intercrop yield (150.71 t ha-1), gross return of (1101506 Rs. ha-1), net return of (817969 Rs. ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (3.88) were obtained from the treatment T8 (Chilli@ 60 % RDF + Carrot @ 20 % RDF + Radish @ 20 % RDF). Considering the experimental finding’s, treatment T8 (Chilli @ 60% RDF + Carrot @ 20 % RDF+ Radish @ 20 % RDF) were found the most suitable combination for the higher productivity and economic return under Prayagraj agro-climatic conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole chilli at 100% RDF produced the highest green chilli yield, 13.09 t ha-1.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
sole chilli @100 % RDFe0
Outcome
yield (green chilli)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13.09 t ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield (green chilli) was obtained on the treatment T1 (sole chilli @100 % RDF) (13.09 t ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–680 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among intercrops, T6 gave the highest chilli yield at 12.68 t ha-1.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
chilli @ 70% RDF + carrot @ 30% RDFe0
Outcome
chilli yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.68 t ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“the highest chilli yield (12.68 t ha-1) was obtained from the treatment T6 (chilli @ 70% RDF + carrot @ 30% RDF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–829 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among intercrops, T8 gave the lowest chilli yield at 10.57 t ha-1.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
chilli @ 60% RDF + carrot @ 20% RDF + radish @ 20% RDFe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
10.57 t ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest yield (10.57 t ha-1) was found in treatment T8 (chilli @ 60% RDF + carrot @ 20% RDF + radish @ 20% RDF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced chilli yield.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
chilli yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
sole chillie0

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping reduced the chilli yield, but the total chilli with intercrops yield increased over the sole chilli.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased total chilli plus intercrop yield over sole chilli.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
total chilli with intercrops yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
sole chillie0

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping reduced the chilli yield, but the total chilli with intercrops yield increased over the sole chilli.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1068 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 gave the highest combined chilli and intercrop yield, 150.71 t ha-1.

Taxon
Chillie0
Treatment
Chilli@ 60 % RDF + Carrot @ 20 % RDF + Radish @ 20 % RDFe0
Outcome
chilli yield along with intercrop yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
150.71 t ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest chilli yield along with intercrop yield (150.71 t ha-1), gross return of (1101506 Rs. ha-1), net return of (817969 Rs. ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (3.88) were obtained from the treatment T8 (Chilli@ 60 % RDF + Carrot @ 20 % RDF + Radish @ 20 % RDF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1375 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 gave gross return of 1101506 Rs. ha-1.

Taxon
Chillie0
Treatment
Chilli@ 60 % RDF + Carrot @ 20 % RDF + Radish @ 20 % RDFe0
Outcome
gross returne0
Value
1101506 Rs. ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest chilli yield along with intercrop yield (150.71 t ha-1), gross return of (1101506 Rs. ha-1), net return of (817969 Rs. ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (3.88) were obtained from the treatment T8 (Chilli@ 60 % RDF + Carrot @ 20 % RDF + Radish @ 20 % RDF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1375 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 gave net return of 817969 Rs. ha-1.

Taxon
Chillie0
Treatment
Chilli@ 60 % RDF + Carrot @ 20 % RDF + Radish @ 20 % RDFe0
Outcome
net returne0
Value
817969 Rs. ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest chilli yield along with intercrop yield (150.71 t ha-1), gross return of (1101506 Rs. ha-1), net return of (817969 Rs. ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (3.88) were obtained from the treatment T8 (Chilli@ 60 % RDF + Carrot @ 20 % RDF + Radish @ 20 % RDF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1375 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 gave a benefit cost ratio of 3.88.

Taxon
Chillie0
Treatment
Chilli@ 60 % RDF + Carrot @ 20 % RDF + Radish @ 20 % RDFe0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Value
3.88e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest chilli yield along with intercrop yield (150.71 t ha-1), gross return of (1101506 Rs. ha-1), net return of (817969 Rs. ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (3.88) were obtained from the treatment T8 (Chilli@ 60 % RDF + Carrot @ 20 % RDF + Radish @ 20 % RDF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1375 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend T8 for higher productivity and economic return in Prayagraj.

Taxon
Chillie0
Outcome
most suitable combination for the higher productivity and economic returne0
Setting
Prayagraj agro-climatic conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T8 (Chilli @ 60% RDF + Carrot @ 20 % RDF+ Radish @ 20 % RDF) were found the most suitable combination for the higher productivity and economic return under Prayagraj agro-climatic conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1617 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.