Paper · 2008 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Evaluation of Azimsulfuron for the Control of Complex Weed Flora in Transplanted Rice

Dharam Bir Yadav; Ashok Yadav; S. S. Punia; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Azimsulfuron was evaluated for its efficacy in controlling mixed weed flora in transplanted rice at HAU Regional Research Station, Karnal, India. Density and dry weight of grassy weeds in the plots treated with azimsulfuron were higher than pretilachlor 1000 g/ha except azimsulfuron 30 g/ha applied at 15 days after transplanting (DAT). Density of broadleaf weeds was significantly lower under all azimsulfuron doses when applied at 15 DAT compared to 25 DAT. All the treatments of azimsulfuron (10–30 g/ha at 15 and 25 DAT) provided excellent control of sedges, which were significantly better than pretilachlor and were as good as weed free check. Yields under azimsulfuron 30 g/ha at 15 DAT during 2006, and 27.5 and 30 g/ha at 15 DAT and 30 g/ha at 25 DAT during 2007 were statistically at par with pretilachlor. There was no phyto-toxicity of azimsulfuron on rice and also there was no residual toxicity on the succeeding crop of wheat during both the years of experimentation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azimsulfuron plots had higher grassy weed density and dry weight than pretilachlor, except one dose and timing.

Treatment
azimsulfurone0
Interactor
grassy weedse0weed
Outcome
Density and dry weight of grassy weedse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
except azimsulfuron 30 g/ha applied at 15 days after transplanting (DAT)e0
Comparator
pretilachlor 1000 g/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Density and dry weight of grassy weeds in the plots treated with azimsulfuron were higher than pretilachlor 1000 g/ha except azimsulfuron 30 g/ha applied at 15 days after transplanting (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–336 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadleaf weed density was significantly lower for azimsulfuron applied at 15 versus 25 DAT.

Treatment
azimsulfuron doses when applied at 15 DATe0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
Density of broadleaf weedse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
25 DATe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Density of broadleaf weeds was significantly lower under all azimsulfuron doses when applied at 15 DAT compared to 25 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azimsulfuron controlled sedges significantly better than pretilachlor and similarly to weed-free check.

Treatment
azimsulfuron (10–30 g/ha at 15 and 25 DAT)e0
Interactor
sedgesCarexe0weed
Outcome
control of sedgese0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
as good as weed free checke0
Comparator
pretilachlore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Carex
Carex · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the treatments of azimsulfuron (10–30 g/ha at 15 and 25 DAT) provided excellent control of sedges, which were significantly better than pretilachlor and were as good as weed free check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specified azimsulfuron treatments yielded statistically similarly to pretilachlor in 2006 and 2007.

Treatment
azimsulfuron 30 g/ha at 15 DAT during 2006, and 27.5 and 30 g/ha at 15 DAT and 30 g/ha at 25 DAT during 2007e0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
statistically at pare0
Comparator
pretilachlore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields under azimsulfuron 30 g/ha at 15 DAT during 2006, and 27.5 and 30 g/ha at 15 DAT and 30 g/ha at 25 DAT during 2007 were statistically at par with pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azimsulfuron caused no phytotoxicity in rice.

Treatment
azimsulfurone0
Outcome
no phyto-toxicitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no phyto-toxicity of azimsulfuron on rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azimsulfuron caused no residual toxicity on succeeding wheat.

Outcome
no residual toxicitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no residual toxicity on the succeeding crop of wheat during both the years of experimentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–982 · show in text ↑

azimsulfuron · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 35 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

azimsulfuron · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

transplanting · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 129 positive, 17 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

155 papers in the same direction as this paper · 922 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

transplanting · Carex · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.