Paper · 2012 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Bioefficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicides in direct-seeded rice in Central Punjab

U. S. Walia; Sohan Singh Walia; A. S. Sidhu; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during Kharif season of 2007 and 2008 at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana to evolve suitable combination of pre and post-emergence herbicides for effective weed management in direct-seeded rice under unpuddled conditions. Results indicated that during 2007, integration of post-emergence application (30 Days after sowing) of bispyribac (25 and 30 g/ha) or azimsulfuron (20 g/ha) with pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha, pretilachlor 0.5 kg/ha and thiobencarb 1.25 kg/ha provided effective control of weeds and produced significantly higher grain yields than unweeded (control) treatment. During 2008 also, integration of pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ ha or oxadiargyl 0.90 g/ha with post-emergence application of bispyribac 25 kg/ha, azimsulfuron 20 g/ha and 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha resulted in significant reduction in dry matter of weeds and increased grain yield as compared to alone application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha. Pre-emergence application of flufenacet 80 g/ ha and early post-emergence application of penoxsulam 30 and 35/g ha were found ineffective for controlling weeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2007 pre-emergence and post-emergence herbicide integration effectively controlled weeds.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
integration of post-emergence application (30 Days after sowing) of bispyribac (25 and 30 g/ha) or azimsulfuron (20 g/ha) with pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha, pretilachlor 0.5 kg/ha and thiobencarb 1.25 kg/hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
control of weedse0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“integration of post-emergence application (30 Days after sowing) of bispyribac (25 and 30 g/ha) or azimsulfuron (20 g/ha) with pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha, pretilachlor 0.5 kg/ha and thiobencarb 1.25 kg/ha provided effective control of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–566 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2007 integrated herbicide program produced significantly higher rice grain yield than unweeded control.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
integration of post-emergence application (30 Days after sowing) of bispyribac (25 and 30 g/ha) or azimsulfuron (20 g/ha) with pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha, pretilachlor 0.5 kg/ha and thiobencarb 1.25 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unweeded (control) treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“integration of post-emergence application (30 Days after sowing) of bispyribac (25 and 30 g/ha) or azimsulfuron (20 g/ha) with pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha, pretilachlor 0.5 kg/ha and thiobencarb 1.25 kg/ha provided effective control of weeds and produced significantly higher grain yields than unweeded (control) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2008 integrated herbicide program significantly reduced weed dry matter relative to pendimethalin alone.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
integration of pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ ha or oxadiargyl 0.90 g/ha with post-emergence application of bispyribac 25 kg/ha, azimsulfuron 20 g/ha and 2,4-D 0.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry matter of weedse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
alone application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“integration of pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ ha or oxadiargyl 0.90 g/ha with post-emergence application of bispyribac 25 kg/ha, azimsulfuron 20 g/ha and 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha resulted in significant reduction in dry matter of weeds and increased grain yield as compared to alone application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2008 integrated herbicide program increased grain yield relative to pendimethalin alone.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
integration of pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ ha or oxadiargyl 0.90 g/ha with post-emergence application of bispyribac 25 kg/ha, azimsulfuron 20 g/ha and 2,4-D 0.5 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
alone application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“integration of pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ ha or oxadiargyl 0.90 g/ha with post-emergence application of bispyribac 25 kg/ha, azimsulfuron 20 g/ha and 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha resulted in significant reduction in dry matter of weeds and increased grain yield as compared to alone application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flufenacet 80 g/ ha was ineffective for weed control.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Pre-emergence application of flufenacet 80 g/ hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlling weedse0
Direction
ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-emergence application of flufenacet 80 g/ ha and early post-emergence application of penoxsulam 30 and 35/g ha were found ineffective for controlling weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 30 and 35/g ha was ineffective for weed control.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
early post-emergence application of penoxsulam 30 and 35/g hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlling weedse0
Direction
ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“early post-emergence application of penoxsulam 30 and 35/g ha were found ineffective for controlling weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑

Thiobencarb · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Pretilachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

141 papers: 133 positive, 8 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    The same weed management gave significantly higher grain yield of 5.45 t/ha.

    Integrated weed management under modified water regimes in System of Rice Intensification · 2016 · compared with four levels of different weed management systems tested

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. positive

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Pretilachlor · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

150 papers: 147 positive, 3 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

flufenacet · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Thiobencarb · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

bispyribac · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

azimsulfuron · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 35 positive, 5 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.