Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Penoxsulam 30 and 35/g ha was ineffective for weed control.

A claim from Bioefficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicides in direct-seeded rice in Central Punjab · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 30 and 35/g ha was ineffective for weed control.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
early post-emergence application of penoxsulam 30 and 35/g hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlling weedse0
Direction
ineffectivee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“early post-emergence application of penoxsulam 30 and 35/g ha were found ineffective for controlling weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1162
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71

Title

Bioefficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicides in direct-seeded rice in Central Punjab

U. S. Walia; Sohan Singh Walia; A. S. Sidhu; et al. Indian Journal of Weed Science 2012

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-4e74bc7dfeb35c8e6e06b34203059de6178e7f88c30204b59763081689b4a91b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Penoxsulam · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 78 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 78 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 578 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

594 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.