Paper · 2017 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Integrated weed management in direct-seeded rice

Pratik Sanodiya; Manoj Kumar Singh

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field investigation was conducted during Kharif season of 2014 and 2015 at Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, to study the effect of integrated weed management on weed flora, yield and economics of direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.). Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced weed density of various weed flora, viz. Echinocloa colona (7.27%), Echinocloa crus-galli (6.58%), Cynodon dactylon (7.57%) among grasses; Cyperus iria (8.01%), Cyperus difformis (8.26%) and Fimbristylis miliacea (8.67%) among sedges and Ammannia baccifera (10.12%) and Caesulia axillaris (10.10%) among broad-leaved weeds besides other weeds (11.72%) in comparison to penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS. Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS markedly improved growth attributes, viz. plant height, number of tillers/m2, dry matter accumulation, leaf area index and chlorophyll content at 60 DAS and yield attributes, viz. panicle length, panicle weight, number of panicles/m2, number of grains/panicle and test weight. Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS statistically influenced the grain and straw yields and harvest index over all other treatments except hand weeding at 15 and 35 DAS. Highest net return (43790.76) and benefit: cost ratio (2.15) was also observed under penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb1 HW at 35 DAS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced Echinocloa colona density by 7.27% versus the later penoxsulam treatment.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0
Interactor
Echinocloa colonae0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.27%e0
Comparator
penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced weed density of various weed flora, viz. Echinocloa colona (7.27%), Echinocloa crus-galli (6.58%), Cynodon dactylon (7.57%) among grasses; Cyperus iria (8.01%), Cyperus difformis (8.26%) and Fimbristylis miliacea (8.67%) among sedges and Ammannia baccifera (10.12%) and Caesulia axillaris (10.10%) among broad-leaved weeds besides other weeds (11.72%) in comparison to penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced Echinocloa crus-galli density by 6.58% versus the later penoxsulam treatment.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0
Interactor
Echinocloa crus-gallie0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
6.58%e0
Comparator
penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced weed density of various weed flora, viz. Echinocloa colona (7.27%), Echinocloa crus-galli (6.58%), Cynodon dactylon (7.57%) among grasses; Cyperus iria (8.01%), Cyperus difformis (8.26%) and Fimbristylis miliacea (8.67%) among sedges and Ammannia baccifera (10.12%) and Caesulia axillaris (10.10%) among broad-leaved weeds besides other weeds (11.72%) in comparison to penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced Cynodon dactylon density by 7.57% versus the later penoxsulam treatment.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0
Interactor
Cynodon dactylonCynodon dactylone0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.57%e0
Comparator
penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · InteractorRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced weed density of various weed flora, viz. Echinocloa colona (7.27%), Echinocloa crus-galli (6.58%), Cynodon dactylon (7.57%) among grasses; Cyperus iria (8.01%), Cyperus difformis (8.26%) and Fimbristylis miliacea (8.67%) among sedges and Ammannia baccifera (10.12%) and Caesulia axillaris (10.10%) among broad-leaved weeds besides other weeds (11.72%) in comparison to penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced Cyperus iria density by 8.01% versus the later penoxsulam treatment.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0
Interactor
Cyperus iriaCyperus iriae0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8.01%e0
Comparator
penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyperus iria
Cyperus iria · InteractorDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced weed density of various weed flora, viz. Echinocloa colona (7.27%), Echinocloa crus-galli (6.58%), Cynodon dactylon (7.57%) among grasses; Cyperus iria (8.01%), Cyperus difformis (8.26%) and Fimbristylis miliacea (8.67%) among sedges and Ammannia baccifera (10.12%) and Caesulia axillaris (10.10%) among broad-leaved weeds besides other weeds (11.72%) in comparison to penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced Cyperus difformis density by 8.26% versus the later penoxsulam treatment.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0
Interactor
Cyperus difformisCyperus difformise0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8.26%e0
Comparator
penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyperus difformis
Cyperus difformis · InteractorMargaretRDonald · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced weed density of various weed flora, viz. Echinocloa colona (7.27%), Echinocloa crus-galli (6.58%), Cynodon dactylon (7.57%) among grasses; Cyperus iria (8.01%), Cyperus difformis (8.26%) and Fimbristylis miliacea (8.67%) among sedges and Ammannia baccifera (10.12%) and Caesulia axillaris (10.10%) among broad-leaved weeds besides other weeds (11.72%) in comparison to penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced Fimbristylis miliacea density by 8.67% versus the later penoxsulam treatment.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0
Interactor
Fimbristylis miliaceaFimbristylis quinquangularise0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8.67%e0
Comparator
penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fimbristylis quinquangularis
Fimbristylis quinquangularis · InteractorRison Thumboor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced weed density of various weed flora, viz. Echinocloa colona (7.27%), Echinocloa crus-galli (6.58%), Cynodon dactylon (7.57%) among grasses; Cyperus iria (8.01%), Cyperus difformis (8.26%) and Fimbristylis miliacea (8.67%) among sedges and Ammannia baccifera (10.12%) and Caesulia axillaris (10.10%) among broad-leaved weeds besides other weeds (11.72%) in comparison to penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced Ammannia baccifera density by 10.12% versus the later penoxsulam treatment.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0
Interactor
Ammannia bacciferaAmmannia bacciferae0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
10.12%e0
Comparator
penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ammannia baccifera
Ammannia baccifera · InteractorJayesh Patil from Mumbai, India · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced weed density of various weed flora, viz. Echinocloa colona (7.27%), Echinocloa crus-galli (6.58%), Cynodon dactylon (7.57%) among grasses; Cyperus iria (8.01%), Cyperus difformis (8.26%) and Fimbristylis miliacea (8.67%) among sedges and Ammannia baccifera (10.12%) and Caesulia axillaris (10.10%) among broad-leaved weeds besides other weeds (11.72%) in comparison to penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced Caesulia axillaris density by 10.10% versus the later penoxsulam treatment.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0
Interactor
Caesulia axillarisCaesulia axillarise0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
10.10%e0
Comparator
penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Caesulia axillaris
Caesulia axillaris · InteractorDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced weed density of various weed flora, viz. Echinocloa colona (7.27%), Echinocloa crus-galli (6.58%), Cynodon dactylon (7.57%) among grasses; Cyperus iria (8.01%), Cyperus difformis (8.26%) and Fimbristylis miliacea (8.67%) among sedges and Ammannia baccifera (10.12%) and Caesulia axillaris (10.10%) among broad-leaved weeds besides other weeds (11.72%) in comparison to penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced other weeds density by 11.72% versus the later penoxsulam treatment.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0
Interactor
other weedse0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11.72%e0
Comparator
penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS reduced weed density of various weed flora, viz. Echinocloa colona (7.27%), Echinocloa crus-galli (6.58%), Cynodon dactylon (7.57%) among grasses; Cyperus iria (8.01%), Cyperus difformis (8.26%) and Fimbristylis miliacea (8.67%) among sedges and Ammannia baccifera (10.12%) and Caesulia axillaris (10.10%) among broad-leaved weeds besides other weeds (11.72%) in comparison to penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 20 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS improved plant height, number of tillers/m2, dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0
Outcome
plant height, number of tillers/m2, dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
improvede0

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS markedly improved growth attributes, viz. plant height, number of tillers/m2, dry matter accumulation, leaf area index and chlorophyll content at 60 DAS and yield attributes, viz. panicle length, panicle weight, number of panicles/m2, number of grains/panicle and test weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS improved leaf area index and chlorophyll content.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0
Outcome
leaf area index and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
improvede0

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS markedly improved growth attributes, viz. plant height, number of tillers/m2, dry matter accumulation, leaf area index and chlorophyll content at 60 DAS and yield attributes, viz. panicle length, panicle weight, number of panicles/m2, number of grains/panicle and test weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS improved panicle length, panicle weight, number of panicles/m2.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0
Outcome
panicle length, panicle weight, number of panicles/m2e0
Direction
improvede0

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS markedly improved growth attributes, viz. plant height, number of tillers/m2, dry matter accumulation, leaf area index and chlorophyll content at 60 DAS and yield attributes, viz. panicle length, panicle weight, number of panicles/m2, number of grains/panicle and test weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS improved number of grains/panicle and test weight.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0
Outcome
number of grains/panicle and test weighte0
Direction
improvede0

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS markedly improved growth attributes, viz. plant height, number of tillers/m2, dry matter accumulation, leaf area index and chlorophyll content at 60 DAS and yield attributes, viz. panicle length, panicle weight, number of panicles/m2, number of grains/panicle and test weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The early penoxsulam treatment influenced grain and straw yields and harvest index versus other treatments except hand weeding.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DASe0
Outcome
grain and straw yields and harvest indexe0
Comparator
all other treatments except hand weeding at 15 and 35 DASe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 35 DAS statistically influenced the grain and straw yields and harvest index over all other treatments except hand weeding at 15 and 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment had the highest net return, 43790.76.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb1 HW at 35 DASe0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
43790.76e0

Verbatim

e0

“Highest net return (43790.76) and benefit: cost ratio (2.15) was also observed under penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb1 HW at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment had the highest benefit: cost ratio, 2.15.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb1 HW at 35 DASe0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
2.15e0

Verbatim

e0

“Highest net return (43790.76) and benefit: cost ratio (2.15) was also observed under penoxsulam 35 g/ha at 10 DAS fb1 HW at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑

Penoxsulam · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

87 papers: 75 positive, 12 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Penoxsulam · Ammannia baccifera · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Penoxsulam · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 78 positive, 2 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

Penoxsulam · Cyperus difformis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · Cyperus iria · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · Cyperus difformis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · Fimbristylis quinquangularis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.