Paper · 2006 · Agricultural science digest

Economic Evaluation of Different Companion Crops in Autumn Planted Sugarcane ( Saccharum Officinarum )

Kins Varghese; Nishi Massey; Raman Sahotra; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The results of field experiment conducted to study the economic advantage of different companion crops in Autumn planted sugarcane, revealed that intercropping of vegetable pea gave the maximum millable canes/clump (8), average weight per cane (1.20 kg), brix value (19.5%), cane yield (115.0 t ha−1), and benefit cost ratio (5.65).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea intercropping gave the maximum eight millable canes per clump.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
intercropping of vegetable peae0
Outcome
millable canes/clumpe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping of vegetable pea gave the maximum millable canes/clump (8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–218 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea intercropping gave maximum average cane weight of 1.20 kg.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
intercropping of vegetable peae0
Outcome
average weight per canee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.20 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping of vegetable pea gave the maximum millable canes/clump (8), average weight per cane (1.20 kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–253 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea intercropping gave maximum brix value of 19.5%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
intercropping of vegetable peae0
Outcome
brix valuee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
19.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping of vegetable pea gave the maximum millable canes/clump (8), average weight per cane (1.20 kg), brix value (19.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–273 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea intercropping gave maximum cane yield of 115.0 t ha−1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
intercropping of vegetable peae0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
115.0 t ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping of vegetable pea gave the maximum millable canes/clump (8), average weight per cane (1.20 kg), brix value (19.5%), cane yield (115.0 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–300 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea intercropping gave maximum benefit cost ratio of 5.65.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
intercropping of vegetable peae0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.65e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping of vegetable pea gave the maximum millable canes/clump (8), average weight per cane (1.20 kg), brix value (19.5%), cane yield (115.0 t ha−1), and benefit cost ratio (5.65)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–331 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–76 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

intercropping · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.