Paper · 2016 · American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry

Effects of Cropping Systems and Agricultural Lime on Soil Properties and Nutrient Content of Sugarcane on Acidified Soils of Kisumu County, Kenya

Jacob Omondi Omollo

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Acid soils cause soil fertility problems such as Al and Mn toxicity, Ca, Mg, N deficiency and P fixation. These are constraints to high crop yields. Historically, liming is the common management practice used to neutralize soil acidity and to overcome the problems associated with soil acidification. A field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of cropping systems, lime placement methods and lime rates on some soil chemical properties and nutrient uptake by sugarcane during the plant crop and ratoon one cycle under acidified Cambisols of Kibos, Kisumu, Kenya. A Split - split plot in randomized complete block arrangement was employed. The factors and respective levels (in parenthesis were): main plot; two cropping systems (sugarcane monoculture [MC] and intercropped sugarcane and soybeans [IC]). The sub – plots were three lime placement methods (lime broadcasted [L-BC], lime shallow banded, 0 – 15 cm [L-SB] and lime deep banded, 15 – 30 cm (L-DB] and the sub - sub plots were three lime rates (0, 1 and 2 t ha-1). Lime rate of 2 t ha-1 significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased soil pH to 6.4 and 5.2 as determined in water and 1 N KCl, respectively compared to 1 t ha-1 and control (0 t ha-1). Increased lime rate led to decreased levels of manganese, iron, and copper hence confirms the inverse relationship between soil pH and these micronutrients. Lime deep banded (L-DB) increased soil pH and available phosphorus for soil depth 15 – 30 cm compared to lime shallow banded (L-SB) and lime broadcasted (L-BC). Intercropped sugarcane and soybeans (IC) led to increased soil acidity and soil organic carbon (SOC) than did sugarcane monoculture (MC). For nutrient content of sugarcane leaves, IC system led to increased Ca and Mn compared to MC. Lime broadcasted (L-BC) caused high nitrogen and phosphorus content of sugarcane leaves and lime shallow banded resulted in increased Ca and Zn content of sugarcane to optimum levels. In view of the findings, the lime rate of 2 t ha-1 is recommended for use to ameliorate soil acidity for acidified Cambisols of Kibos, Kisumu County, Kenya. Lime broadcasted (L-BC) is preferred to ameliorate acidity at top depth (0 – 15 cm) while lime banded both (L-SB) and L-DB) is preferred to reduce sub - soil acidity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at 2 t ha-1 raised soil pH in water to 6.4 compared with 1 t ha-1 and the control.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
Lime rate of 2 t ha-1e3
Outcome
soil pHe3
Direction
increasede3
Value
6.4e3
Qualifier
as determined in watere3
Comparator
1 t ha-1 and control (0 t ha-1)e3
Setting
Kibos, Kisumu, Kenyae1

Verbatim

e1

“acidified Cambisols of Kibos, Kisumu, Kenya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–578 · show in text ↑
e2

“nutrient uptake by sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–485 · show in text ↑
e3

“Lime rate of 2 t ha-1 significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased soil pH to 6.4 and 5.2 as determined in water and 1 N KCl, respectively compared to 1 t ha-1 and control (0 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at 2 t ha-1 raised soil pH in 1 N KCl to 5.2 compared with 1 t ha-1 and the control.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
Lime rate of 2 t ha-1e3
Outcome
soil pHe3
Direction
increasede3
Value
5.2e3
Qualifier
1 N KCle3
Comparator
1 t ha-1 and control (0 t ha-1)e3
Setting
Kibos, Kisumu, Kenyae1

Verbatim

e1

“acidified Cambisols of Kibos, Kisumu, Kenya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–578 · show in text ↑
e2

“nutrient uptake by sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–485 · show in text ↑
e3

“Lime rate of 2 t ha-1 significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased soil pH to 6.4 and 5.2 as determined in water and 1 N KCl, respectively compared to 1 t ha-1 and control (0 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1213 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased lime rate lowered soil manganese, iron and copper levels, consistent with an inverse relation to soil pH.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
Increased lime ratee4
Outcome
levels of manganese, iron, and coppere4
Direction
decreasede4
Qualifier
inverse relationship between soil pH and these micronutrientse4

Verbatim

e2

“nutrient uptake by sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–485 · show in text ↑
e4

“Increased lime rate led to decreased levels of manganese, iron, and copper hence confirms the inverse relationship between soil pH and these micronutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep banded lime raised soil pH and available phosphorus at 15-30 cm compared with shallow banded and broadcast lime.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
Lime deep banded (L-DB)e5
Outcome
soil pH and available phosphoruse5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
soil depth 15 – 30 cme5
Comparator
lime shallow banded (L-SB) and lime broadcasted (L-BC)e5

Verbatim

e2

“nutrient uptake by sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–485 · show in text ↑
e5

“Lime deep banded (L-DB) increased soil pH and available phosphorus for soil depth 15 – 30 cm compared to lime shallow banded (L-SB) and lime broadcasted (L-BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping sugarcane with soybean increased soil acidity compared with sugarcane monoculture.

Taxon
sugarcanee6
Treatment
Intercropped sugarcane and soybeans (IC)e6
Outcome
soil aciditye6
Direction
increasede6
Comparator
sugarcane monoculture (MC)e6

Verbatim

e6

“Intercropped sugarcane and soybeans (IC) led to increased soil acidity and soil organic carbon (SOC) than did sugarcane monoculture (MC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping sugarcane with soybean increased soil organic carbon compared with sugarcane monoculture.

Taxon
sugarcanee6
Treatment
Intercropped sugarcane and soybeans (IC)e6
Outcome
soil organic carbon (SOC)e6
Direction
increasede6
Comparator
sugarcane monoculture (MC)e6

Verbatim

e6

“Intercropped sugarcane and soybeans (IC) led to increased soil acidity and soil organic carbon (SOC) than did sugarcane monoculture (MC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased leaf calcium and manganese content of sugarcane compared with monoculture.

Taxon
sugarcanee7
Organ / stage
sugarcane leavese7
Treatment
IC systeme7
Outcome
Ca and Mne7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
MCe7

Verbatim

e7

“For nutrient content of sugarcane leaves, IC system led to increased Ca and Mn compared to MC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast lime caused high nitrogen and phosphorus content in sugarcane leaves.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Organ / stage
sugarcane leavese0
Treatment
Lime broadcasted (L-BC)e0
Outcome
nitrogen and phosphorus contente0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Lime broadcasted (L-BC) caused high nitrogen and phosphorus content of sugarcane leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1853 · show in text ↑
e2

“nutrient uptake by sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow banded lime increased leaf calcium and zinc content of sugarcane to optimum levels.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
lime shallow bandede0
Outcome
Ca and Zn contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
to optimum levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“lime shallow banded resulted in increased Ca and Zn content of sugarcane to optimum levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1948 · show in text ↑
e2

“nutrient uptake by sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–485 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a lime rate of 2 t ha-1 to ameliorate soil acidity in acidified Cambisols.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
lime rate of 2 t ha-1e0
Outcome
ameliorate soil aciditye0

Verbatim

e2

“nutrient uptake by sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–485 · show in text ↑
e0

“the lime rate of 2 t ha-1 is recommended for use to ameliorate soil acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1975–2050 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend broadcast lime to ameliorate acidity at the top 0-15 cm depth.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
Lime broadcasted (L-BC)e0
Outcome
ameliorate acidity at top depthe0

Verbatim

e2

“nutrient uptake by sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–485 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lime broadcasted (L-BC) is preferred to ameliorate acidity at top depth (0 – 15 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2107–2190 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend banded lime to reduce subsoil acidity.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
lime banded both (L-SB) and L-DB)e0
Outcome
reduce sub - soil aciditye0

Verbatim

e2

“nutrient uptake by sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–485 · show in text ↑
e0

“lime banded both (L-SB) and L-DB) is preferred to reduce sub - soil acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2197–2272 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

transplanting · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · soil: chemistry · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

intercropping · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

lime · soil: chemistry · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.