Paper · 2008 · Indian Journal of Entomology

Evaluation of push-pull technique for the management of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in cotton

S.B. Jadhav; A. K. Sadawarte; S. K. Bhalkare

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Push-pull strategy for the management of H. armigera (Hub.) on cotton along with conjunctive use of trap crops (pigeon pea and sunflower), restricted application of NSE 5% on cotton leaving trap crop and application of NPV (250 LE/ha) on trap crop was evaluated in the field during kharif season of 2006–07 at Dr. P.D.K.V., Akola. Studies revealed that treatment in which cotton crop was treated with NSE 5% and trap crop (pigeon pea) treated with NPV (250 LE/ha) was found significantly superior as minimum eggs (5.22/plant), larva (0.86/plant), damage in fruiting bodies (0.90%) and locule damage (6.60%) were recorded in main cotton crop. Maximum yield (862 kg/ha) and monetary return was also recorded in same treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Push-pull treatment gave the minimum number of eggs (5.22/plant) on the main cotton crop.

Treatment
trap crop (pigeon pea) treated with NPV (250 LE/ha)e0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Second interactor
NPVe0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
minimum eggse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
5.22/plante0
Setting
field during kharif season of 2006–07 at Dr. P.D.K.V., Akolae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment in which cotton crop was treated with NSE 5% and trap crop (pigeon pea) treated with NPV (250 LE/ha) was found significantly superior as minimum eggs (5.22/plant), larva (0.86/plant), damage in fruiting bodies (0.90%) and locule damage (6.60%) were recorded in main cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“Push-pull strategy for the management of H. armigera (Hub.) on cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
e3

“was evaluated in the field during kharif season of 2006–07 at Dr. P.D.K.V., Akola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Push-pull treatment gave the minimum number of larvae (0.86/plant) on the main cotton crop.

Treatment
trap crop (pigeon pea) treated with NPV (250 LE/ha)e0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Second interactor
NPVe0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
larvae0
Direction
minimume0
Value
0.86/plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment in which cotton crop was treated with NSE 5% and trap crop (pigeon pea) treated with NPV (250 LE/ha) was found significantly superior as minimum eggs (5.22/plant), larva (0.86/plant), damage in fruiting bodies (0.90%) and locule damage (6.60%) were recorded in main cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“Push-pull strategy for the management of H. armigera (Hub.) on cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Push-pull treatment gave the minimum damage in fruiting bodies (0.90%) on the main cotton crop.

Treatment
trap crop (pigeon pea) treated with NPV (250 LE/ha)e0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Second interactor
NPVe0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
damage in fruiting bodiese0
Direction
minimume0
Value
0.90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment in which cotton crop was treated with NSE 5% and trap crop (pigeon pea) treated with NPV (250 LE/ha) was found significantly superior as minimum eggs (5.22/plant), larva (0.86/plant), damage in fruiting bodies (0.90%) and locule damage (6.60%) were recorded in main cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“Push-pull strategy for the management of H. armigera (Hub.) on cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Push-pull treatment gave the minimum locule damage (6.60%) on the main cotton crop.

Treatment
trap crop (pigeon pea) treated with NPV (250 LE/ha)e0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Second interactor
NPVe0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
locule damagee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
6.60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment in which cotton crop was treated with NSE 5% and trap crop (pigeon pea) treated with NPV (250 LE/ha) was found significantly superior as minimum eggs (5.22/plant), larva (0.86/plant), damage in fruiting bodies (0.90%) and locule damage (6.60%) were recorded in main cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“Push-pull strategy for the management of H. armigera (Hub.) on cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The push-pull treatment gave the maximum cotton yield (862 kg/ha).

Treatment
trap crop (pigeon pea) treated with NPV (250 LE/ha)e0
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
Maximume2
Value
862 kg/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Maximum yield (862 kg/ha) and monetary return was also recorded in same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–723 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment in which cotton crop was treated with NSE 5% and trap crop (pigeon pea) treated with NPV (250 LE/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The push-pull treatment gave the maximum monetary return.

Treatment
trap crop (pigeon pea) treated with NPV (250 LE/ha)e0
Outcome
monetary returne2
Direction
Maximume2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Maximum yield (862 kg/ha) and monetary return was also recorded in same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–723 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment in which cotton crop was treated with NSE 5% and trap crop (pigeon pea) treated with NPV (250 LE/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–463 · show in text ↑

Cajanus cajan · Helicoverpa armigera · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Cajanus cajan · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

trap barrier · Helicoverpa armigera · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

trap barrier · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.