Paper · 2014 · Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development

Improving the Productivity of Rainfed Farming Systems of Small and Marginal Farmers in Adilabad District, Telangana

K.A. Gopinath; Ch Srinivasarao; G. Ravindra Chary; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

On-farm trials were conducted during 2010 and 2011 to evaluate the effect of different interventions on productivity and profitability of rainfed farming systems of small and marginal farmers in Seethagondhi cluster, Adilabad district. Averaged across six farmers’ fields, the cotton equivalent yield (CEY) of cotton + pigeonpea intercropping was 7.99 q/ha with farmers’ practice. The CEY increased by 17.5% due to herbicide use for weed control, 28.3% with application of recommended NPK, and 35.8% with use of both herbicide and recommended NPK compared to farmers’ practice. Use of herbicide for weed control coupled with application of recommended NPK gave higher net return ( 10,300/ha) compared to other management practices. Among the farming systems of marginal farmers, integrated farming system involving crop production (cotton + pigeonpea intercropping) and livestock rearing (4 bullocks, 3 desi cows and 1 buffalo) gave higher net return ( 40,180/year) compared to other farming systems. Similarly, among the three farming systems of small farmers, integrated farming system involving crop production (cotton + pigeonpea intercropping) and livestock rearing (2 bullocks, 1 desi cow and 40 goats) performed better with a net return of 89,937/year compared to other farming systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton equivalent yield of cotton + pigeonpea intercropping under farmers’ practice was 7.99 q/ha.

Outcome
cotton equivalent yield (CEY)e1
Value
7.99 q/hae1
Setting
Seethagondhi cluster, Adilabad districte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On-farm trials were conducted during 2010 and 2011 to evaluate the effect of different interventions on productivity and profitability of rainfed farming systems of small and marginal farmers in Seethagondhi cluster, Adilabad district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“Averaged across six farmers’ fields, the cotton equivalent yield (CEY) of cotton + pigeonpea intercropping was 7.99 q/ha with farmers’ practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide use for weed control increased cotton equivalent yield by 17.5% over farmers’ practice.

Treatment
herbicide use for weed controle2
Outcome
CEYe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
17.5%e2
Comparator
farmers’ practicee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Averaged across six farmers’ fields, the cotton equivalent yield (CEY) of cotton + pigeonpea intercropping was 7.99 q/ha with farmers’ practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–379 · show in text ↑
e2

“The CEY increased by 17.5% due to herbicide use for weed control, 28.3% with application of recommended NPK, and 35.8% with use of both herbicide and recommended NPK compared to farmers’ practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of recommended NPK increased cotton equivalent yield by 28.3% over farmers’ practice.

Treatment
application of recommended NPKe2
Outcome
CEYe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
28.3%e2
Comparator
farmers’ practicee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Averaged across six farmers’ fields, the cotton equivalent yield (CEY) of cotton + pigeonpea intercropping was 7.99 q/ha with farmers’ practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–379 · show in text ↑
e2

“The CEY increased by 17.5% due to herbicide use for weed control, 28.3% with application of recommended NPK, and 35.8% with use of both herbicide and recommended NPK compared to farmers’ practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Use of both herbicide and recommended NPK increased cotton equivalent yield by 35.8% over farmers’ practice.

Treatment
use of both herbicide and recommended NPKe2
Outcome
CEYe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
35.8%e2
Comparator
farmers’ practicee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Averaged across six farmers’ fields, the cotton equivalent yield (CEY) of cotton + pigeonpea intercropping was 7.99 q/ha with farmers’ practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–379 · show in text ↑
e2

“The CEY increased by 17.5% due to herbicide use for weed control, 28.3% with application of recommended NPK, and 35.8% with use of both herbicide and recommended NPK compared to farmers’ practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide for weed control with recommended NPK gave higher net return (10,300/ha) than other management practices.

Treatment
herbicide for weed control coupled with application of recommended NPKe3
Outcome
net returne3
Direction
highere3
Value
10,300/hae3
Comparator
other management practicese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Averaged across six farmers’ fields, the cotton equivalent yield (CEY) of cotton + pigeonpea intercropping was 7.99 q/ha with farmers’ practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–379 · show in text ↑
e3

“Use of herbicide for weed control coupled with application of recommended NPK gave higher net return ( 10,300/ha) compared to other management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among marginal farmers, the integrated crop and livestock system gave higher net return (40,180/year) than other farming systems.

Treatment
integrated farming system involving crop production (cotton + pigeonpea intercropping) and livestock rearing (4 bullocks, 3 desi cows and 1 buffalo)e4
Outcome
net returne4
Direction
highere4
Value
40,180/yeare4
Comparator
other farming systemse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Among the farming systems of marginal farmers, integrated farming system involving crop production (cotton + pigeonpea intercropping) and livestock rearing (4 bullocks, 3 desi cows and 1 buffalo) gave higher net return ( 40,180/year) compared to other farming systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among small farmers, the integrated crop and livestock system performed better, with net return of 89,937/year, than other farming systems.

Treatment
integrated farming system involving crop production (cotton + pigeonpea intercropping) and livestock rearing (2 bullocks, 1 desi cow and 40 goats)e5
Outcome
net returne5
Direction
performed bettere5
Value
89,937/yeare5
Comparator
other farming systemse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Similarly, among the three farming systems of small farmers, integrated farming system involving crop production (cotton + pigeonpea intercropping) and livestock rearing (2 bullocks, 1 desi cow and 40 goats) performed better with a net return of 89,937/year compared to other farming systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1292 · show in text ↑

Cajanus cajan · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

104 papers: 85 positive, 19 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

grazing · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

herbicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 123 positive, 59 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.