Paper · 2010 · Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika

Effect of Yield and Yield Attributes of Wheat Under Saline Water, Amount of Irrigation and Methods of Sowing

Shekhar Chauhan

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at saline water project (ICAR) Raja Balwant Singh College, Bichpuri Agra year 2001–02 and 2002–03 in wheat crop to study the saline water irrigation, amount of irrigation water and method of sowing. Result revealed that best available water and Eciw 4ds/m water irrigated plots no significant difference in grain yield but in Eciw 8 and 12 ds/m irrigated plots declined the wheat yield 6 and 12% compared with BAW. The amount of irrigation were applied 40 cm produce the higher yield but applied 32 cm and 24 cm irrigation water the yield declined significantly 6 and 13% compared with 40 cm water. The bed sowing method significantly superior than flat sowing method, The bed sowing method produced higher yield 12% grain and 22% straw compared with flat sowing method. The yield attributin characters significantly higher in these treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with best available water and with 4 dS/m saline water gave no significant difference in wheat grain yield.

Treatment
Eciw 4ds/m watere1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
no significant differencee1
Comparator
best available watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in wheat crop to study the saline water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“best available water and Eciw 4ds/m water irrigated plots no significant difference in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with 8 and 12 dS/m saline water reduced wheat yield by 6 and 12% compared with best available water.

Treatment
Eciw 8 and 12 ds/me2
Outcome
wheat yielde2
Direction
declinede2
Value
6 and 12%e2
Comparator
BAWe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in wheat crop to study the saline water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–181 · show in text ↑
e2

“in Eciw 8 and 12 ds/m irrigated plots declined the wheat yield 6 and 12% compared with BAW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 40 cm of irrigation water gave a higher wheat yield than 32 cm or 24 cm.

Treatment
applied 40 cme3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
applied 32 cm and 24 cme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in wheat crop to study the saline water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–181 · show in text ↑
e3

“The amount of irrigation were applied 40 cm produce the higher yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–516 · show in text ↑
e4

“but applied 32 cm and 24 cm irrigation water the yield declined significantly 6 and 13% compared with 40 cm water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 32 cm and 24 cm of irrigation water reduced wheat yield by 6 and 13% compared with 40 cm.

Treatment
applied 32 cm and 24 cm irrigation watere4
Outcome
the yielde4
Direction
declinede4
Value
6 and 13%e4
Comparator
40 cm watere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in wheat crop to study the saline water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–181 · show in text ↑
e4

“but applied 32 cm and 24 cm irrigation water the yield declined significantly 6 and 13% compared with 40 cm water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed sowing gave significantly higher wheat grain yield than flat sowing, by 12%.

Treatment
bed sowing methode6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
highere6
Value
12%e6
Comparator
flat sowing methode6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in wheat crop to study the saline water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–181 · show in text ↑
e5

“The bed sowing method significantly superior than flat sowing method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–700 · show in text ↑
e6

“The bed sowing method produced higher yield 12% grain and 22% straw compared with flat sowing method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed sowing gave 22% higher wheat straw than flat sowing.

Treatment
bed sowing methode6
Outcome
strawe6
Direction
highere6
Value
22%e6
Comparator
flat sowing methode6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in wheat crop to study the saline water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–181 · show in text ↑
e6

“The bed sowing method produced higher yield 12% grain and 22% straw compared with flat sowing method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield attributing characters were significantly higher in the bed sowing and irrigation treatments.

Outcome
yield attributin characterse7
Direction
highere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in wheat crop to study the saline water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–181 · show in text ↑
e7

“The yield attributin characters significantly higher in these treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–876 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.