Paper · 2015 · Indian Journal of Entomology

New insecticides for the management of pomegranate fruit borer,Deudorix Isocrates(F.)

D. N. Kambrekar; A. P. Biradar; S. S. Karabhantanal

16
claims
41
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field evaluation of new insecticide molecules for the management of pomegranate fruit borer, Deudorix isocrates was carried out at Bijapur (Karnataka) during 2010 and 2011. The study revealed that emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.25 g/l ha recorded highest reduction in the fruit damage at 3, 7 and 14 days followed by spinosad 45 SC @ 0.20ml/l. The mean reduction in the damage with emamectin benzoate was 93.45 and 96.23% after first and second sprays during 2010, and it was to the extent of 92.68 and 96.75%, respectively during 2011. Similarly, spinosad recorded 94.84 and 95.50% reduction in the fruit damage after first and second sprays during 2010 and in 2011 it was 92.50 and 95.28%. The trees sprayed with emamectin benzoate (90.83 q/ha) and spinosad (88.91 q/ha) recorded highest quantity of marketable fruits and both were statistically on par in registering highest yield. Emamectin benzoate recorded highest mean (gross returns Rs. 908300/ha and mean net returns-Rs.835650/ha) followed by spinosad (gross-Rs.889100/ha and net returns-Rs.811240/ha). Emamectin benzoate and spinosad recorded maximum benefit cost ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate gave the highest fruit damage reduction at 3, 7 and 14 days.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.25 g/l hae0
Interactor
Deudorix isocratesDeudorix isocratese1pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Deudorix isocrates
Deudorix isocrates · InteractorBalakrishnan Valappil · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.25 g/l ha recorded highest reduction in the fruit damage at 3, 7 and 14 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–301 · show in text ↑
e1

“pomegranate fruit borer, Deudorix isocrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

emamectin benzoate reduced fruit damage by 93.45 after the first spray in 2010.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
emamectin benzoatee0
Interactor
Deudorix isocratesDeudorix isocratese1pest
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
93.45e0
Qualifier
2010e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Deudorix isocrates
Deudorix isocrates · InteractorBalakrishnan Valappil · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“The mean reduction in the damage with emamectin benzoate was 93.45 and 96.23% after first and second sprays during 2010, and it was to the extent of 92.68 and 96.75%, respectively during 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–532 · show in text ↑
e1

“pomegranate fruit borer, Deudorix isocrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

emamectin benzoate reduced fruit damage by 96.23% after the second spray in 2010.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
emamectin benzoatee0
Interactor
Deudorix isocratesDeudorix isocratese1pest
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
96.23%e0
Qualifier
2010e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Deudorix isocrates
Deudorix isocrates · InteractorBalakrishnan Valappil · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“The mean reduction in the damage with emamectin benzoate was 93.45 and 96.23% after first and second sprays during 2010, and it was to the extent of 92.68 and 96.75%, respectively during 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–532 · show in text ↑
e1

“pomegranate fruit borer, Deudorix isocrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

emamectin benzoate reduced fruit damage by 92.68 after the first spray in 2011.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
emamectin benzoatee0
Interactor
Deudorix isocratesDeudorix isocratese1pest
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
92.68e0
Qualifier
2011e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Deudorix isocrates
Deudorix isocrates · InteractorBalakrishnan Valappil · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“The mean reduction in the damage with emamectin benzoate was 93.45 and 96.23% after first and second sprays during 2010, and it was to the extent of 92.68 and 96.75%, respectively during 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–532 · show in text ↑
e1

“pomegranate fruit borer, Deudorix isocrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

emamectin benzoate reduced fruit damage by 96.75% after the second spray in 2011.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
emamectin benzoatee0
Interactor
Deudorix isocratesDeudorix isocratese1pest
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
96.75%e0
Qualifier
2011e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Deudorix isocrates
Deudorix isocrates · InteractorBalakrishnan Valappil · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“The mean reduction in the damage with emamectin benzoate was 93.45 and 96.23% after first and second sprays during 2010, and it was to the extent of 92.68 and 96.75%, respectively during 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–532 · show in text ↑
e1

“pomegranate fruit borer, Deudorix isocrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spinosad reduced fruit damage by 94.84 after the first spray in 2010.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
spinosade0
Interactor
Deudorix isocratesDeudorix isocratese1pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
94.84e0
Qualifier
2010e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Deudorix isocrates
Deudorix isocrates · InteractorBalakrishnan Valappil · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“spinosad recorded 94.84 and 95.50% reduction in the fruit damage after first and second sprays during 2010 and in 2011 it was 92.50 and 95.28%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“pomegranate fruit borer, Deudorix isocrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spinosad reduced fruit damage by 95.50% after the second spray in 2010.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
spinosade0
Interactor
Deudorix isocratesDeudorix isocratese1pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
95.50%e0
Qualifier
2010e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Deudorix isocrates
Deudorix isocrates · InteractorBalakrishnan Valappil · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“spinosad recorded 94.84 and 95.50% reduction in the fruit damage after first and second sprays during 2010 and in 2011 it was 92.50 and 95.28%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“pomegranate fruit borer, Deudorix isocrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spinosad reduced fruit damage by 92.50 after the first spray in 2011.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
spinosade0
Interactor
Deudorix isocratesDeudorix isocratese1pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
92.50e0
Qualifier
2011e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Deudorix isocrates
Deudorix isocrates · InteractorBalakrishnan Valappil · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“spinosad recorded 94.84 and 95.50% reduction in the fruit damage after first and second sprays during 2010 and in 2011 it was 92.50 and 95.28%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“pomegranate fruit borer, Deudorix isocrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spinosad reduced fruit damage by 95.28% after the second spray in 2011.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
spinosade0
Interactor
Deudorix isocratesDeudorix isocratese1pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
95.28%e0
Qualifier
2011e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Deudorix isocrates
Deudorix isocrates · InteractorBalakrishnan Valappil · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“spinosad recorded 94.84 and 95.50% reduction in the fruit damage after first and second sprays during 2010 and in 2011 it was 92.50 and 95.28%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“pomegranate fruit borer, Deudorix isocrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

emamectin benzoate produced 90.83 q/ha marketable fruit yield, statistically on par with the other treatment.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
emamectin benzoatee0
Outcome
marketable fruitse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
90.83 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“The trees sprayed with emamectin benzoate (90.83 q/ha) and spinosad (88.91 q/ha) recorded highest quantity of marketable fruits and both were statistically on par in registering highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

spinosad produced 88.91 q/ha marketable fruit yield, statistically on par with the other treatment.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
spinosade0
Outcome
marketable fruitse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
88.91 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“The trees sprayed with emamectin benzoate (90.83 q/ha) and spinosad (88.91 q/ha) recorded highest quantity of marketable fruits and both were statistically on par in registering highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–880 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate had gross returns of Rs. 908300/ha.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Emamectin benzoatee0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Value
Rs. 908300/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“Emamectin benzoate recorded highest mean (gross returns Rs. 908300/ha and mean net returns-Rs.835650/ha) followed by spinosad (gross-Rs.889100/ha and net returns-Rs.811240/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1057 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate had net returns of Rs.835650/ha.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Emamectin benzoatee0
Outcome
net returnse0
Value
Rs.835650/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“Emamectin benzoate recorded highest mean (gross returns Rs. 908300/ha and mean net returns-Rs.835650/ha) followed by spinosad (gross-Rs.889100/ha and net returns-Rs.811240/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1057 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spinosad had gross returns of Rs.889100/ha.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
spinosade0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Value
Rs.889100/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“Emamectin benzoate recorded highest mean (gross returns Rs. 908300/ha and mean net returns-Rs.835650/ha) followed by spinosad (gross-Rs.889100/ha and net returns-Rs.811240/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1057 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spinosad had net returns of Rs.811240/ha.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
spinosade0
Outcome
net returnse0
Value
Rs.811240/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“Emamectin benzoate recorded highest mean (gross returns Rs. 908300/ha and mean net returns-Rs.835650/ha) followed by spinosad (gross-Rs.889100/ha and net returns-Rs.811240/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1057 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate and spinosad had the maximum benefit cost ratio.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Emamectin benzoate and spinosade0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“Emamectin benzoate and spinosad recorded maximum benefit cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1126 · show in text ↑

emamectin benzoate · Deudorix isocrates · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

spinosad · Deudorix isocrates · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.