Paper · 2003 · Agricultural science digest

FOLIAR NUTRITION STUDIES IN CHICKPEA UNDER RAINFED CONDITION

D.D. Dudhade; J.V. Patal

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during rabi 2000 revelaed that foliar spray of N through urea 3% gave significantly higher grain yield (1001 kg/ha.), while it was at par with urea 2% (973 kg/ha) and DAP 2% (954 kg/hal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at 3% gave significantly higher chickpea grain yield of 1001 kg/ha.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
urea 3%e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1001 kg/ha.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of N through urea 3% gave significantly higher grain yield (1001 kg/ha.), while it was at par with urea 2% (973 kg/ha) and DAP 2% (954 kg/hal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–217 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at 3% was at par with urea at 2% for chickpea grain yield.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
urea 2%e0
Outcome
at pare0
Direction
at pare0
Value
973 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was at par with urea 2% (973 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–193 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at 3% was at par with DAP at 2% for chickpea grain yield.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
DAP 2%e0
Outcome
at pare0
Direction
at pare0
Value
954 kg/hal.e0
Comparator
urea 2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was at par with urea 2% (973 kg/ha) and DAP 2% (954 kg/hal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–217 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.