Paper · 2015 · Annals of Agricultural Research

Effect of foliar application of potash and micronutrients on growth and yield attributes of groundnut

H.N. Der; P. M. Vaghasia; H.P. VERMA

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during summer season of 2012 on medium black soil to study the effect of foliar application of potash and micronutrients on growth and yield attributes of groundnut. The experiment consisted of six treatments (control, K @ 0.5%, Fe @ 0.5%, Zn @ 0.5%, B @ 0.2% and K @ 0.5% + Fe @ 0.5% + Zn @ 0.5% + B @ 0.2% at 40 DAS as foliar spray) thereby making six treatments tested in randomized block design with four replications. Results indicated that the application K @ 0.5% + Fe @ 0.5% + Zn @ 0.5% + B @ 0.2% foliar spray at 40 DAS results is significantly higher the plant height, number of branches per plant, dry matter at 45 and 75 DAS, number of nodules per plant, pod weight, 100 kernel weight, shelling per cent, pod and haulm yield. However, day to 50% flowering, CGR, RGR and test weight did not significantly influenced by various foliar applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined K, Fe, Zn and B spray at 40 DAS significantly increased groundnut plant height, branch number, dry matter and nodules.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
K @ 0.5% + Fe @ 0.5% + Zn @ 0.5% + B @ 0.2% foliar spray at 40 DASe0
Outcome
plant height, number of branches per plant, dry matter at 45 and 75 DAS, number of nodules per plante0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application K @ 0.5% + Fe @ 0.5% + Zn @ 0.5% + B @ 0.2% foliar spray at 40 DAS results is significantly higher the plant height, number of branches per plant, dry matter at 45 and 75 DAS, number of nodules per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar nutrients significantly increased pod weight, kernel weight, shelling percentage, and pod and haulm yield.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
K @ 0.5% + Fe @ 0.5% + Zn @ 0.5% + B @ 0.2%e0
Outcome
pod weight, 100 kernel weight, shelling per cent, pod and haulm yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application K @ 0.5% + Fe @ 0.5% + Zn @ 0.5% + B @ 0.2% foliar spray at 40 DAS results is significantly higher the plant height, number of branches per plant, dry matter at 45 and 75 DAS, number of nodules per plant, pod weight, 100 kernel weight, shelling per cent, pod and haulm yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar applications did not significantly influence time to 50% flowering, CGR, RGR, or test weight.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
various foliar applicationse0
Outcome
day to 50% flowering, CGR, RGR and test weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“day to 50% flowering, CGR, RGR and test weight did not significantly influenced by various foliar applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–101 · show in text ↑

iron atom · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

68 papers: 65 positive, 3 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

iron atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

zinc atom · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · quality: grain · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.