Abstract
The application of zinc (Zn) and calcium (Ca) fertilizers is necessary to improve quantitative and qualitative yield of groundnut. This study was done to evaluate seed yield and the fatty acids composition of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in response to the different forms of Zn- and Ca-based fertilizers. This experiment is carried out as a split plot arrangement based on randomized complete block design with three replications in Rasht, Iran, during the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons. The four levels of Zn fertilizers including without fertilizer application (control), Zn Nano-fertilizer (Zn-Nano), Zn-EDTA, and Zn-sulfate (ZnSO4) as the main plot and the four levels of the Ca fertilizers including Ca Nano-fertilizer (Ca-Nano), Ca-EDTA, Ca-chloride (CaCl2), and Ca-nitrate [Ca(NO3)2] as the sub-plot comprised experimental treatments. The greatest pod number per plant (PNP) (38.78), 100-seed weight (100-SW) (61.49 g), seed yield (SY) (2790 kg/ha), biological yield (BY) (9303 kg/ha), seed oil content (SOC) (52.34%), oil yield (OY) (1625 kg/ha), protein yield (PY) (673 kg/ha), oleic acid (OA) (57.30%), and linoleic acid (LA) (30.97%) were obtained in response to Zn and Ca nanofertilizers. The combined application of Zn and Ca nanofertilizers enhanced the SY of groundnut via increasing of PNP and 100-SW indices and improved the groundnut oil quality due to the increment of OA and LA under regional climatic conditions. Hence, Zn and Ca nanofertilizers showed superiority for the quantity and quality of groundnut yield and could be recommendable to enhance the quantitative and qualitative yield of groundnut under similar climatic conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
The greatest pod number per plant (38.78) was obtained with Zn and Ca nanofertilizers in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Zn and Ca nanofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- pod number per plante0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Value
- 38.78e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The greatest pod number per plant (PNP) (38.78)”
e1“were obtained in response to Zn and Ca nanofertilizers”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The greatest 100-seed weight (61.49 g) was obtained with Zn and Ca nanofertilizers in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Zn and Ca nanofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- 100-seed weighte0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 61.49 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“100-seed weight (100-SW) (61.49 g)”
e1“were obtained in response to Zn and Ca nanofertilizers”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The greatest seed yield (2790 kg/ha) was obtained with Zn and Ca nanofertilizers in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Zn and Ca nanofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 2790 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed yield (SY) (2790 kg/ha)”
e1“were obtained in response to Zn and Ca nanofertilizers”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The greatest biological yield (9303 kg/ha) was obtained with Zn and Ca nanofertilizers in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Zn and Ca nanofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- biological yielde0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 9303 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“biological yield (BY) (9303 kg/ha)”
e1“were obtained in response to Zn and Ca nanofertilizers”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The greatest seed oil content (52.34%) was obtained with Zn and Ca nanofertilizers in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Zn and Ca nanofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- seed oil contente0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 52.34%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed oil content (SOC) (52.34%)”
e1“were obtained in response to Zn and Ca nanofertilizers”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The greatest oil yield (1625 kg/ha) was obtained with Zn and Ca nanofertilizers in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Zn and Ca nanofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- oil yielde0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 1625 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“oil yield (OY) (1625 kg/ha)”
e1“were obtained in response to Zn and Ca nanofertilizers”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The greatest protein yield (673 kg/ha) was obtained with Zn and Ca nanofertilizers in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Zn and Ca nanofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- protein yielde0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 673 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“protein yield (PY) (673 kg/ha)”
e1“were obtained in response to Zn and Ca nanofertilizers”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The greatest oleic acid (57.30%) was obtained with Zn and Ca nanofertilizers in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Zn and Ca nanofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- oleic acide0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 57.30%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“oleic acid (OA) (57.30%)”
e1“were obtained in response to Zn and Ca nanofertilizers”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The greatest linoleic acid (30.97%) was obtained with Zn and Ca nanofertilizers in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Zn and Ca nanofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- linoleic acide0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 30.97%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“linoleic acid (LA) (30.97%)”
e1“were obtained in response to Zn and Ca nanofertilizers”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined application of Zn and Ca nanofertilizers enhanced groundnut seed yield by increasing pod number per plant and 100-seed weight.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- combined application of Zn and Ca nanofertilizerse0
- Outcome
- SYe0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combined application of Zn and Ca nanofertilizers enhanced the SY of groundnut via increasing of PNP and 100-SW indices”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined application of Zn and Ca nanofertilizers improved groundnut oil quality through higher oleic and linoleic acid.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- combined application of Zn and Ca nanofertilizerse0
- Outcome
- groundnut oil qualitye0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combined application of Zn and Ca nanofertilizers enhanced the SY of groundnut via increasing of PNP and 100-SW indices and improved the groundnut oil quality due to the increment of OA and LA”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn and Ca nanofertilizers are recommended for groundnut yield quantity and quality under similar climatic conditions.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Outcome
- quantity and quality of groundnut yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Zn and Ca nanofertilizers showed superiority for the quantity and quality of groundnut yield and could be recommendable”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
64 papers more in this group
See all 68 papers →calcium atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
70 papers more in this group
See all 74 papers →zinc atom · quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →calcium atom · quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →calcium atom · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →zinc atom · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →nanoparticle · quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →nanoparticle · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.