Paper · 2005 · Indian journal of plant protection

Evaluation of Genotypes, Fungicides and Plant Extracts for the Management of Aflatoxin Contamination in Chilli Caused by Aspergillus flavus Link. Fres.

Kumud Kumar; M. K. Naik; T. B. Allolli; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Thirty genotypes were evaluated against aflatoxin contamination fungi in chilli under laboratory condition using pinprick method of inoculation. Genotypes viz., LCA-206, HTL, GOLI and 9623 showed immune reaction, while JCA-283, AAUDC-24, KA-2 and IND-10 showed resistant reaction. Besides, nine genotypes were moderately resistant and remaining ones were susceptible. Four each of systemic, non-systemic fungicides and plant extracts were evaluated against Aspergillus flavus Link. Fres. at different concentrations using poisoned food technique. Mancozeb (91.1%) and captan (85.2%) at 0.3 per cent among non-systemic fungicides and carbendazim (73%) at 0.15 per cent among systemic fungicides were found effective in inhibiting the growth of A. flavus. Among plant extracts, neem seed kernel extract, nimbicidin and pongamia oil inhibited 100 per cent growth of aflatoxin fungus at 5 per cent concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four chilli genotypes showed immune reactions.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
LCA-206, HTL, GOLI and 9623e0
Outcome
immune reactione0

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes viz., LCA-206, HTL, GOLI and 9623 showed immune reaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–211 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four chilli genotypes showed resistant reactions.

Taxon
Chillit0
Material
JCA-283, AAUDC-24, KA-2 and IND-10e0
Outcome
resistant reactione0

Verbatim

e0

“JCA-283, AAUDC-24, KA-2 and IND-10 showed resistant reaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine genotypes were moderately resistant and the remainder susceptible.

Taxon
Chillit0
Outcome
moderately resistant and remaining ones were susceptiblee0

Verbatim

e0

“nine genotypes were moderately resistant and remaining ones were susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–366 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb inhibited Aspergillus growth by 91.1% at 0.3%.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
Mancozebe0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Outcome
growth of A. flavuse0
Direction
inhibitinge0
Value
91.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mancozeb (91.1%) and captan (85.2%) at 0.3 per cent among non-systemic fungicides and carbendazim (73%) at 0.15 per cent among systemic fungicides were found effective in inhibiting the growth of A. flavus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Captan inhibited Aspergillus growth by 85.2% at 0.3%.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
captane0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Outcome
growth of A. flavuse0
Direction
inhibitinge0
Value
85.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mancozeb (91.1%) and captan (85.2%) at 0.3 per cent among non-systemic fungicides and carbendazim (73%) at 0.15 per cent among systemic fungicides were found effective in inhibiting the growth of A. flavus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim inhibited Aspergillus growth by 73% at 0.15%.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
carbendazime0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Outcome
growth of A. flavuse0
Direction
inhibitinge0
Value
73%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mancozeb (91.1%) and captan (85.2%) at 0.3 per cent among non-systemic fungicides and carbendazim (73%) at 0.15 per cent among systemic fungicides were found effective in inhibiting the growth of A. flavus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem seed kernel extract inhibited fungal growth by 100% at 5%.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
neem seed kernel extracte0
Interactor
aflatoxin funguse0pathogen
Outcome
growth of aflatoxin funguse0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
100 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“neem seed kernel extract, nimbicidin and pongamia oil inhibited 100 per cent growth of aflatoxin fungus at 5 per cent concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nimbicidin inhibited fungal growth by 100% at 5%.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
nimbicidine0
Interactor
aflatoxin funguse0pathogen
Outcome
growth of aflatoxin funguse0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
100 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“neem seed kernel extract, nimbicidin and pongamia oil inhibited 100 per cent growth of aflatoxin fungus at 5 per cent concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pongamia oil inhibited fungal growth by 100% at 5%.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
pongamia oile0
Interactor
aflatoxin funguse0pathogen
Outcome
growth of aflatoxin funguse0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
100 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“neem seed kernel extract, nimbicidin and pongamia oil inhibited 100 per cent growth of aflatoxin fungus at 5 per cent concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.