Paper · 1980 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

A Note on Effect of Time of Planting on Growth, Flowering and Corm Production in Gladiolus

G. J. Bankar; A. Mukhopadhyay

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Gladiolus cv. ‘Friendship’ was planted once in every month from April, 1976 to March, 1977. Flowering was obtained from each planting with various degree of success. Planting in June, October and November proved to be best so far as quality (i.e. length of spike and rachis, number and size of florets) of flower is concerned. Plantings during December to February also appeared to be good for flower production. Planting during August, September, March and April appeared to be not very congenial for flower production. Maximum number of cormels were obtained from June planting followed by February, April and May. Corms planted in June took minimum number of days (61.70) to flower while those planted in February took maximum number of days (93.30). The results indicate that higher temperature increased plant height and longer day-light hours delayed spike appearance, increased spike length and number of florets. It also appears that higher soil moisture content increased spike length and floret numbers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each monthly planting produced some flowering.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Outcome
Floweringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flowering was obtained from each planting with various degree of success.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–165 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

June, October and November plantings gave the best flower quality.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
Planting in June, October and Novembere0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting in June, October and November proved to be best so far as quality (i.e. length of spike and rachis, number and size of florets) of flower is concerned.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–326 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

December to February plantings were good for flower production.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
Plantings during December to Februarye0
Outcome
flower productione0
Direction
goode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plantings during December to February also appeared to be good for flower production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

August, September, March and April plantings were unfavorable for flower production.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
Planting during August, September, March and Aprile0
Outcome
flower productione0
Direction
not very congeniale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting during August, September, March and April appeared to be not very congenial for flower production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

June planting yielded the maximum cormel number, followed by February, April and May.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
June plantinge0
Outcome
number of cormelse0
Direction
Maximume0
Comparator
February, April and Maye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of cormels were obtained from June planting followed by February, April and May.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

June planted corms had the shortest time to flower, 61.70 days.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
planted in Junee0
Outcome
number of dayse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
61.70e0
Comparator
planted in Februarye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corms planted in June took minimum number of days (61.70) to flower while those planted in February took maximum number of days (93.30).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

February planted corms had the longest time to flower, 93.30 days.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
planted in Februarye0
Outcome
number of dayse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
93.30e0
Comparator
planted in Junee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corms planted in June took minimum number of days (61.70) to flower while those planted in February took maximum number of days (93.30).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher temperature increased plant height.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
higher temperaturee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher temperature increased plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer daylight delayed spike appearance.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
longer day-light hourse0
Outcome
spike appearancee0
Direction
delayede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longer day-light hours delayed spike appearance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer daylight increased spike length and floret number.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
longer day-light hourse0
Outcome
spike length and number of floretse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longer day-light hours delayed spike appearance, increased spike length and number of florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher soil moisture appeared to increase spike length and floret number.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
higher soil moisture contente0
Outcome
spike length and floret numberse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher soil moisture content increased spike length and floret numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · GladiolusPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.