Paper · 2015 · Weed Technology

Early-Season Palmer Amaranth and Waterhemp Control from Preemergence Programs Utilizing 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate Dioxygenase–Inhibiting and Auxinic Herbicides in Soybean

Christopher J. Meyer; Jason K. Norsworthy; Bryan G. Young; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Palmer amaranth and waterhemp have become increasingly troublesome weeds throughout the United States. Both species are highly adaptable and emerge continuously throughout the summer months, presenting the need for a residual PRE application in soybean. To improve season-long control of Amaranthus spp., 19 PRE treatments were evaluated on glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth in 2013 and 2014 at locations in Arkansas, Indiana, Nebraska, Illinois, and Tennessee; and on glyphosate-resistant waterhemp at locations in Illinois, Missouri, and Nebraska. The two Amaranthus species were analyzed separately; data for each species were pooled across site-years, and site-year was included as a random variable in the analyses. The dissipation of weed control throughout the course of the experiments was compared among treatments with the use of regression analysis where percent weed control was described as a function of time (the number of weeks after treatment [WAT]). At the mean (i.e., average) WAT (4.3 and 3.2 WAT for Palmer amaranth and waterhemp, respectively) isoxaflutole + S -metolachlor + metribuzin had the highest predicted control of Palmer amaranth (98%) and waterhemp (99%). Isoxaflutole + S -metolachlor + metribuzin, S -metolachlor + mesotrione, and flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone had a predicted control ≥ 97% and similar model parameter estimates, indicating control declined at similar rates for these treatments. Dicamba and 2,4-D provided some, short-lived residual control of Amaranthus spp. When dicamba was added to metribuzin or S -metolachlor, control increased compared to dicamba alone. Flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone, a currently labeled PRE, performed similarly to treatments containing isoxaflutole or mesotrione. Additional sites of action will provide soybean growers more opportunities to control these weeds and reduce the potential for herbicide resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Isoxaflutole mixture had 98% predicted Palmer amaranth control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
isoxaflutole + S -metolachlor + metribuzine0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
control of Palmer amaranthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
98%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isoxaflutole + S -metolachlor + metribuzin had the highest predicted control of Palmer amaranth (98%) and waterhemp (99%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1191 · show in text ↑
e1

“PRE application in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–252 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Isoxaflutole mixture had 99% predicted waterhemp control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
isoxaflutole + S -metolachlor + metribuzine0
Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
waterhempe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
99%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isoxaflutole + S -metolachlor + metribuzin had the highest predicted control of Palmer amaranth (98%) and waterhemp (99%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1191 · show in text ↑
e1

“PRE application in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–252 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Isoxaflutole mixture had predicted control at least 97% and a similar decline rate.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Isoxaflutole + S -metolachlor + metribuzine0
Outcome
predicted controle0
Direction
declinede0
Value
≥ 97%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoxaflutole + S -metolachlor + metribuzin, S -metolachlor + mesotrione, and flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone had a predicted control ≥ 97% and similar model parameter estimates, indicating control declined at similar rates for these treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1432 · show in text ↑
e1

“PRE application in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–252 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor plus mesotrione had predicted control at least 97% and a similar decline rate.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
S -metolachlor + mesotrionee0
Outcome
predicted controle0
Direction
declinede0
Value
≥ 97%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoxaflutole + S -metolachlor + metribuzin, S -metolachlor + mesotrione, and flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone had a predicted control ≥ 97% and similar model parameter estimates, indicating control declined at similar rates for these treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1432 · show in text ↑
e1

“PRE application in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–252 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Flumioxazin plus pyroxasulfone had predicted control at least 97% and a similar decline rate.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
flumioxazin + pyroxasulfonee0
Outcome
predicted controle0
Direction
declinede0
Value
≥ 97%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoxaflutole + S -metolachlor + metribuzin, S -metolachlor + mesotrione, and flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone had a predicted control ≥ 97% and similar model parameter estimates, indicating control declined at similar rates for these treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1432 · show in text ↑
e1

“PRE application in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–252 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba gave short-lived residual Amaranthus control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Dicambae0
Interactor
Amaranthus spp.Amaranthuse0weed
Outcome
residual control of Amaranthus spp.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba and 2,4-D provided some, short-lived residual control of Amaranthus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1513 · show in text ↑
e1

“PRE application in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–252 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D gave short-lived residual Amaranthus control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
Amaranthus spp.Amaranthuse0weed
Outcome
residual control of Amaranthus spp.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba and 2,4-D provided some, short-lived residual control of Amaranthus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1513 · show in text ↑
e1

“PRE application in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding dicamba to metribuzin increased control versus dicamba alone.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
dicamba was added to metribuzine0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
dicamba alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When dicamba was added to metribuzin or S -metolachlor, control increased compared to dicamba alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1614 · show in text ↑
e1

“PRE application in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding dicamba to S-metolachlor increased control versus dicamba alone.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
S -metolachlore0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
dicamba alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When dicamba was added to metribuzin or S -metolachlor, control increased compared to dicamba alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1614 · show in text ↑
e1

“PRE application in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumioxazin plus pyroxasulfone performed similarly to isoxaflutole-containing treatments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Flumioxazin + pyroxasulfonee0
Outcome
performed similarlye0
Direction
similarlye0
Comparator
treatments containing isoxaflutole or mesotrionee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone, a currently labeled PRE, performed similarly to treatments containing isoxaflutole or mesotrione.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1741 · show in text ↑
e1

“PRE application in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–252 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

More herbicide sites of action could expand soybean weed-control choices and reduce resistance potential.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
more opportunities to control these weeds and reduce the potential for herbicide resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional sites of action will provide soybean growers more opportunities to control these weeds and reduce the potential for herbicide resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1890 · show in text ↑

metolachlor · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

dicamba · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 27 positive, 4 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

metribuzin · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 43 positive, 5 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.