Paper · 1998 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Effect of irrigation and herbicides on weed control and yield of durum wheat.

Tejinder Singh; Sunita Yadav

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of irrigation (one, two and four) and herbicides which include diclofopmethyl 0.75 kg/ha alone and with 2,4–0 0.5 kg/ha, isoproturon 0.75kg/ha, weedy and weed free plots on durum wheat was investigated at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar in the winter seasons of 1994–95 and 1995–96. Increase in the amount of water from one irrigation to four irrigations increased weed population, weed dry weight, yield components and grain yield of wheat during both the seasons. Application of diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg/ha did not control Chenopodium album but controlled Avena ludoviciana and Phalarls minor. Diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg/ha followed by 2, 4–0 0.5 kg/ha was more effective in controlling the weeds as compared to tank mixture of diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg + 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha. All the herbicides gave significantly more grain yield than the weedy check and maximum grain yield was obtained with the application of diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg/ha followed by 2, 4–0 0.5 kg/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More irrigation increased weed population.

Treatment
four irrigationse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed populatione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
one irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in the amount of water from one irrigation to four irrigations increased weed population, weed dry weight, yield components and grain yield of wheat during both the seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More irrigation increased weed dry weight.

Treatment
four irrigationse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
one irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in the amount of water from one irrigation to four irrigations increased weed population, weed dry weight, yield components and grain yield of wheat during both the seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More irrigation increased wheat yield components and grain yield.

Treatment
four irrigationse0
Outcome
yield components and grain yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
one irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in the amount of water from one irrigation to four irrigations increased weed population, weed dry weight, yield components and grain yield of wheat during both the seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclofop-methyl did not control Chenopodium album.

Treatment
diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg/hae0
Interactor
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
control Chenopodium albume0
Direction
did not controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg/ha did not control Chenopodium album”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclofop-methyl controlled Avena ludoviciana.

Treatment
diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg/hae0
Interactor
Avena ludovicianaAvena sterilis subsp. ludovicianae0weed
Outcome
controlled Avena ludovicianae0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena sterilis subsp. ludoviciana
Avena sterilis subsp. ludoviciana · InteractorMarie PORTAS · CC BY-SA 2.0 fr · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg/ha did not control Chenopodium album but controlled Avena ludoviciana and Phalarls minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclofop-methyl controlled Phalarls minor.

Treatment
diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg/hae0
Interactor
Phalarls minore0weed
Outcome
controlled Avena ludoviciana and Phalarls minore0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg/ha did not control Chenopodium album but controlled Avena ludoviciana and Phalarls minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential diclofop-methyl and 2,4–0 controlled weeds better than their tank mixture.

Treatment
Diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg/ha followed by 2, 4–0 0.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlling the weedse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
tank mixture of diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg + 2,4-D 0.5 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg/ha followed by 2, 4–0 0.5 kg/ha was more effective in controlling the weeds as compared to tank mixture of diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg + 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicides increased grain yield relative to the weedy check.

Treatment
All the herbicidese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the herbicides gave significantly more grain yield than the weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential diclofop-methyl and 2,4–0 produced the maximum grain yield.

Treatment
diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg/ha followed by 2, 4–0 0.5 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum grain yield was obtained with the application of diclofop-methyl 0.75 kg/ha followed by 2, 4–0 0.5 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑

diclofop-methyl · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

irrigation · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.