Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Integrated Management of Phalaris minor in Wheat

Gulshan Mahajan; L. S. Brar

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana in winter 1997–99 to study the control of Phalaris minor in relation to date of sowing, cultivar, planting pattern and weed control treatments. The 25th Oct. sown crop owing to its more dry matter production caused 26.9% reduction in dry matter accumulation by Phalaris and hence, resulted in 21.6% higher grain yield over 10th Nov. sown crop. No significant variation in grain yield was noticed in case of cultivars WH-542 and PBW-343. Narrow row spacing of 15 cm registered 15.5% reduction in dry matter production by Phalaris and thus gave 13.2% higher grain yield over normal spacing (22.5 cm). It was interesting that 25th Oct. sown crop maintained its superiority in suppressing P. minor even without the application of isoproturon compared with 10th Nov. sown crop with application of isoproturon at 0.94 kg ha−1. This study further envisaged that 25th Oct. sown crop produced more grain yield in closer spacing of 15 cm without isoproturon (0.94 kg ha−1) application than normal spacing of 22.5 cm in combination with isoproturon (0.94 kg ha−1) application, however, grain yield was statistically same in 10th Nov. sown crop under the same set of treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

October 25 sowing reduced Phalaris dry matter by 26.9% relative to November 10 sowing.

Treatment
25th Oct. sown crope0
Interactor
PhalarisPhalarise0weed
Outcome
dry matter accumulation by Phalarise0
Direction
reductione0
Value
26.9%e0
Comparator
10th Nov. sown crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris
Phalaris · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 25th Oct. sown crop owing to its more dry matter production caused 26.9% reduction in dry matter accumulation by Phalaris and hence, resulted in 21.6% higher grain yield over 10th Nov. sown crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

October 25 sowing raised wheat grain yield 21.6% over November 10 sowing.

Treatment
25th Oct. sown crope0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
21.6%e0
Comparator
10th Nov. sown crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 25th Oct. sown crop owing to its more dry matter production caused 26.9% reduction in dry matter accumulation by Phalaris and hence, resulted in 21.6% higher grain yield over 10th Nov. sown crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WH-542 and PBW-343 did not differ significantly in grain yield.

Material
WH-542e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
No significant variatione0
Comparator
PBW-343e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant variation in grain yield was noticed in case of cultivars WH-542 and PBW-343.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–517 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

15 cm spacing reduced Phalaris dry matter 15.5% versus 22.5 cm.

Treatment
Narrow row spacing of 15 cme0
Interactor
PhalarisPhalarise0weed
Outcome
dry matter production by Phalarise0
Direction
reductione0
Value
15.5%e0
Comparator
normal spacing (22.5 cm)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris
Phalaris · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Narrow row spacing of 15 cm registered 15.5% reduction in dry matter production by Phalaris and thus gave 13.2% higher grain yield over normal spacing (22.5 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

15 cm spacing increased grain yield 13.2% versus 22.5 cm.

Treatment
Narrow row spacing of 15 cme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
13.2%e0
Comparator
normal spacing (22.5 cm)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Narrow row spacing of 15 cm registered 15.5% reduction in dry matter production by Phalaris and thus gave 13.2% higher grain yield over normal spacing (22.5 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

October 25 sowing without isoproturon suppressed P. minor better than November 10 sowing with isoproturon.

Treatment
25th Oct. sown crope0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
suppressing P. minore0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
10th Nov. sown crop with application of isoproturon at 0.94 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was interesting that 25th Oct. sown crop maintained its superiority in suppressing P. minor even without the application of isoproturon compared with 10th Nov. sown crop with application of isoproturon at 0.94 kg ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

October 25 sowing at 15 cm without isoproturon yielded more than 22.5 cm spacing with isoproturon.

Treatment
closer spacing of 15 cm without isoproturon (0.94 kg ha−1) applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
normal spacing of 22.5 cm in combination with isoproturon (0.94 kg ha−1) applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“25th Oct. sown crop produced more grain yield in closer spacing of 15 cm without isoproturon (0.94 kg ha−1) application than normal spacing of 22.5 cm in combination with isoproturon (0.94 kg ha−1) application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

For November 10 sowing, grain yield was statistically the same between those spacing and herbicide treatments.

Treatment
same set of treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
statistically samee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield was statistically same in 10th Nov. sown crop under the same set of treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.