Paper · 2015 · Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal

Nutrient uptake, nutrient availability and quality parameters of mechanically transplanted rice (Oryza sativaL.) under split doses of nitrogen

Fatehjeet Singh; J.S. Kang; Avtar Singh; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The field investigation was carried out during kharif 2011 and 2012 at Punjab Agricultural University Ludhiana to see the performance of mechanically transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.) under split dose of nitrogen. The treatments included 100 kg N ha−1), 125 kg N ha−1) and 150 kg N ha−1) in 2 splits before last puddling (BLP) and 15 days after (N100 (N125(N150 transplanting (DAT), 3 splits (BLP, 15 and 30 DAT) and 4 splits (BLP, 15, 30 and 45 DAT) along with recommended N (125 kg ha−1) in 3 equal splits (BLP, 21 and 42 DAT) and control treatment of 0 kg N ha−1. The grain yield, nutrients (N, P, K) uptake and quality parameters of rice were observed higher with N150 in 4 splits i.e. before last puddling, 15, 30 and 45 DAT as compared to other treatments in both the years.This treatment also resulted in maximum availability of nutrients N and K in soil, which were significantly higher than other treatments during both the years. But available P was observed maximum with N150 in 4 splits, which was at par with N150 in 3 splits during 2011 but in 2012, it was at parwith N150 in 3 splits, N125 and in 4 splits. N150 in 4 splits gave significantly higher brown rice recovery, milled rice recovery and head rice recovery than N100 other treatments. These parameters increased with increase in levels of nitrogen and its split application from zero to 150 kg ha−1. However, there was non-significant effect of different levels of nitrogen and split applications on minimum cooking time, elongation ratio and cooking coefficient of grains. Water absorption ratio by grains from N150 in 4 splits was similar to in 2–3 splits and N125 in 3 splits, but was higher than other treatments. The maximum protein content (5.72–5.75%) was N150 also recorded in N150 in 4 splits. The protein content in grains increased with the split application of different nitrogen levels from 100 to 150 kg N ha−1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N150 in four splits produced higher rice grain yield than other treatments in both years.

Treatment
N150 in 4 splitse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield, nutrients (N, P, K) uptake and quality parameters of rice were observed higher with N150 in 4 splits i.e. before last puddling, 15, 30 and 45 DAT as compared to other treatments in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N150 in four splits produced higher rice N, P and K uptake than other treatments.

Treatment
N150 in 4 splitse0
Outcome
nutrients (N, P, K) uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield, nutrients (N, P, K) uptake and quality parameters of rice were observed higher with N150 in 4 splits i.e. before last puddling, 15, 30 and 45 DAT as compared to other treatments in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N150 in four splits produced higher rice quality parameters than other treatments.

Treatment
N150 in 4 splitse0
Outcome
quality parameters of ricee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield, nutrients (N, P, K) uptake and quality parameters of rice were observed higher with N150 in 4 splits i.e. before last puddling, 15, 30 and 45 DAT as compared to other treatments in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N150 in four splits gave maximum available soil N and K, significantly above other treatments.

Treatment
N150 in 4 splitse1
Outcome
availability of nutrients N and K in soile0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also resulted in maximum availability of nutrients N and K in soil, which were significantly higher than other treatments during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“The grain yield, nutrients (N, P, K) uptake and quality parameters of rice were observed higher with N150 in 4 splits i.e. before last puddling, 15, 30 and 45 DAT as compared to other treatments in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil P was maximum with N150 in four splits, at par with N150 in three splits in 2011.

Treatment
N150 in 4 splitse0
Outcome
available Pe0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
N150 in 3 splitse0
Setting
2011e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available P was observed maximum with N150 in 4 splits, which was at par with N150 in 3 splits during 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012, available P under N150 in four splits was at par with N150 in three splits and N125 in four splits.

Treatment
N150 in 4 splitse1
Outcome
available Pe1
Qualifier
in 2012e0
Comparator
N150 in 3 splitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2012, it was at parwith N150 in 3 splits, N125 and in 4 splits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“available P was observed maximum with N150 in 4 splits, which was at par with N150 in 3 splits during 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N150 in four splits gave significantly higher brown, milled and head rice recoveries than N100 and other treatments.

Treatment
N150 in 4 splitse0
Outcome
brown rice recovery, milled rice recovery and head rice recoverye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
N100 other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N150 in 4 splits gave significantly higher brown rice recovery, milled rice recovery and head rice recovery than N100 other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery parameters increased as nitrogen levels and splits increased from zero to 150 kg ha−1.

Treatment
levels of nitrogen and its split applicatione0
Outcome
These parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
150 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These parameters increased with increase in levels of nitrogen and its split application from zero to 150 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level and splitting had no significant effect on minimum cooking time, elongation ratio and cooking coefficient.

Treatment
different levels of nitrogen and split applicationse0
Outcome
minimum cooking time, elongation ratio and cooking coefficient of grainse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was non-significant effect of different levels of nitrogen and split applications on minimum cooking time, elongation ratio and cooking coefficient of grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1547 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water absorption ratio under N150 in four splits was similar to N150 in two or three splits and N125 in three splits.

Treatment
N150 in 4 splitse0
Outcome
Water absorption ratio by grainse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
N125 in 3 splitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water absorption ratio by grains from N150 in 4 splits was similar to in 2–3 splits and N125 in 3 splits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water absorption ratio under N150 in four splits was higher than other treatments.

Treatment
N150 in 4 splitse1
Outcome
Water absorption ratioe1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but was higher than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1691 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water absorption ratio by grains from N150 in 4 splits was similar to in 2–3 splits and N125 in 3 splits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N150 in four splits yielded maximum grain protein content of 5.72–5.75%.

Treatment
N150 in 4 splitse0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.72–5.75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum protein content (5.72–5.75%) was N150 also recorded in N150 in 4 splits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1776 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein content increased with splitting nitrogen doses from 100 to 150 kg N ha−1.

Treatment
split application of different nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
protein content in grainse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
100 to 150 kg N ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content in grains increased with the split application of different nitrogen levels from 100 to 150 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1899 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 402 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.