Paper · 2012 · Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science

Effect of water-deficit stress on cotton during reproductive development

Dimitra A. Loka

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

Water deficit is a major abiotic factor limiting plant growth and crop productivity around the world. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is considered to be relatively tolerant to drought and the effects of water stress on leaf physiology and metabolism have been extensively documented. However, information is lacking on the effect of water-deficit stress on the cotton flower. It was hypothesized that water-deficit stress would impair gas exchange functions which consequently would result in perturbation of carbohydrates of cotton reproductive units. To investigate this hypothesis growth room studies and field studies were conducted with the objectives being to document the physiological and biochemical changes that take place in cotton flowers and their subtending leaves when subjected to limited water supply. Additionally, the effect of the ethylene inhibitor 1-Methylcyclopropene under conditions of water stress was investigated as well as the response of leaf and ovary polyamine metabolism of two cotton cultivars differing in drought tolerance. Results indicated that water-deficit stress during flowering significantly compromised leaf gas exchange functions resulting in decreased stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, respiration and water potential. However, cotton reproductive units appeared to be less drought-sensitive compared to the leaves possibly due to higher water potential and glutathione reductase activity. Limited supply of water significantly affected carbohydrate metabolism of both leaf and pistil resulting in carbohydrate accumulation. Contrary to expectations, application of the ethylene inhibitor 1-MCP had no effect on leaf gas exchange function, however, it reversed the effect of water stress on pistil sucrose concentrations. Finally, water-deficit stress during flowering had a significant effect on polyamine metabolism of both leaf and pistil, resulting in increases in putrescine, spermidine and spermine in drought-sensitive cultivars. The differential response of polyamine metabolism between drought-sensitive and tolerant cultivars suggests that polyamines could be effective tools not only in selection of drought-tolerant cultivars, but also in drought tolerance engineering, however further research is needed in order to elucidate the exact pathways of their action.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-deficit stress during flowering significantly decreased leaf stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and respiration in cotton.

Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
water-deficit stress during floweringe1
Outcome
stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, respiratione1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is considered to be relatively tolerant to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–183 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that water-deficit stress during flowering significantly compromised leaf gas exchange functions resulting in decreased stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, respiration and water potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-deficit stress during flowering significantly decreased leaf water potential in cotton.

Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
water-deficit stress during floweringe1
Outcome
water potentiale1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is considered to be relatively tolerant to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–183 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that water-deficit stress during flowering significantly compromised leaf gas exchange functions resulting in decreased stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, respiration and water potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton reproductive units appeared less drought-sensitive than leaves under water-deficit stress during flowering.

Organ / stage
cotton reproductive unitse2
Treatment
water-deficit stress during floweringe1
Outcome
drought-sensitivee2
Direction
lesse2
Comparator
leavese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is considered to be relatively tolerant to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–183 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that water-deficit stress during flowering significantly compromised leaf gas exchange functions resulting in decreased stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, respiration and water potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1267 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton reproductive units appeared to be less drought-sensitive compared to the leaves possibly due to higher water potential and glutathione reductase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1438 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Higher water potential and glutathione reductase activity may explain why cotton reproductive units were less drought-sensitive than leaves.

Gene
glutathione reductasee2
Outcome
drought-sensitivee2
Qualifier
possibly due to higher water potentiale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is considered to be relatively tolerant to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–183 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton reproductive units appeared to be less drought-sensitive compared to the leaves possibly due to higher water potential and glutathione reductase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited water supply significantly increased carbohydrate accumulation in leaf and pistil of cotton.

Organ / stage
leaf and pistile3
Treatment
Limited supply of watere3
Outcome
carbohydrate accumulatione3
Direction
increaseinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is considered to be relatively tolerant to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–183 · show in text ↑
e3

“Limited supply of water significantly affected carbohydrate metabolism of both leaf and pistil resulting in carbohydrate accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of the ethylene inhibitor 1-MCP had no effect on leaf gas exchange under water stress in cotton.

Organ / stage
leafe4
Treatment
application of the ethylene inhibitor 1-MCPe4
Outcome
leaf gas exchange functione4
Direction
no effecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is considered to be relatively tolerant to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–183 · show in text ↑
e4

“application of the ethylene inhibitor 1-MCP had no effect on leaf gas exchange function, however, it reversed the effect of water stress on pistil sucrose concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP reversed the effect of water stress on pistil sucrose concentrations in cotton.

Organ / stage
pistile4
Treatment
application of the ethylene inhibitor 1-MCPe4
Outcome
pistil sucrose concentrationse4
Direction
reversede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is considered to be relatively tolerant to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–183 · show in text ↑
e4

“application of the ethylene inhibitor 1-MCP had no effect on leaf gas exchange function, however, it reversed the effect of water stress on pistil sucrose concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-deficit stress during flowering increased putrescine, spermidine and spermine in drought-sensitive cotton cultivars.

Material
drought-sensitive cultivarse5
Organ / stage
leaf and pistile5
Treatment
water-deficit stress during floweringe5
Outcome
putrescine, spermidine and sperminee5
Direction
increasese5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is considered to be relatively tolerant to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–183 · show in text ↑
e5

“water-deficit stress during flowering had a significant effect on polyamine metabolism of both leaf and pistil, resulting in increases in putrescine, spermidine and spermine in drought-sensitive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1985 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Polyamines could be effective tools for selecting drought-tolerant cotton cultivars.

Outcome
selection of drought-tolerant cultivarse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is considered to be relatively tolerant to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–183 · show in text ↑
e6

“The differential response of polyamine metabolism between drought-sensitive and tolerant cultivars suggests that polyamines could be effective tools not only in selection of drought-tolerant cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1987–2187 · show in text ↑

ethene · physiology: gas exchange · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: gas exchange · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

36 papers: 14 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
    Adapted leaves reached zero turgor at lower water potential than unstressed plants.

    Osmoregulation in Cotton in Response to Water Stress · 1981 · compared with plants that had never experienced a water stress

    Opposite direction

  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

stage · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 7 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

stage · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.