Paper · 2015 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Use of Spent Coffee Ground Compost in Peat-Based Growing Media for the Production of Basil and Tomato Potting Plants

Domenico Ronga; Catello Pane; Massimo Zaccardelli; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
85
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A spent coffee ground compost (SCGC) was evaluated as an alternative component of growing media to partially replace commercial peat (CP) and fertilizers in the production of potted plants. Seven mixtures (CP 100% + solid mineral fertilizers, CP 100% + liquid mineral fertilizers, CP 90% + SCGC 10%, CP 80% + SCGC 20%, CP 70% + SCGC 30%, CP 60% + SCGC 40%, and CP 100% without fertilizers) were compared for the production of basil and tomato potted plants. SCGC used in a proportion up to 40% enhanced the general plant stand by affecting the dry weight and the measured foliar parameters. Tomato and basil recorded good growth rates on SCGC-amended media, showing quality indices similar to those obtained under fertilization, evidencing compost plant nutrition provision. SCGC appears to be suitable for application as a partial peat substitute in the production of potted plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Up to 40% spent coffee ground compost improved basil plant stand, dry weight and foliar parameters.

Treatment
SCGC used in a proportion up to 40%e0
Outcome
general plant stande0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SCGC used in a proportion up to 40% enhanced the general plant stand by affecting the dry weight and the measured foliar parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Basil and Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Up to 40% spent coffee ground compost improved tomato plant stand, dry weight and foliar parameters.

Treatment
SCGC used in a proportion up to 40%e0
Outcome
general plant stande0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SCGC used in a proportion up to 40% enhanced the general plant stand by affecting the dry weight and the measured foliar parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Basil and Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato growth and quality indices on compost media were similar to fertilized media.

Treatment
SCGC-amended mediae0
Outcome
quality indicese0
Direction
similar toe0
Comparator
under fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato and basil recorded good growth rates on SCGC-amended media, showing quality indices similar to those obtained under fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basil growth and quality indices on compost media were similar to fertilized media.

Treatment
SCGC-amended mediae0
Outcome
quality indicese0
Direction
similar toe0
Comparator
under fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato and basil recorded good growth rates on SCGC-amended media, showing quality indices similar to those obtained under fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–727 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend compost as a partial peat substitute for pot plants.

Outcome
partial peat substitute in the production of potted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SCGC appears to be suitable for application as a partial peat substitute in the production of potted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Basil and Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑

Coffea · growth · Ocimum basilicum (basil)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Coffea · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

in vitro · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · growth · Ocimum basilicum (basil)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 65 positive, 8 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

in vitro · quality: general · Ocimum basilicum (basil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.