Abstract
Strained coffee powder is an organic residue available in large quantities that could be used as a source of nutrients, improving substrate quality. However, little is known about its application in transplant production. This study aimed at evaluating the influence of this residue, in mixtures with soil (Ferralsol) and cow's manure, on seed germination and transplants growth of F1 hybrid tomato cultivar 'Giovanna'. The experiment, performed in a greenhouse at the Agua Limpa Farm, University of Brasilia, had seven treatments, with respective mass proportions of 0-90-10, 20-70-10, 40-50-10, 60-30-10, 80-10-10 and 100-0-0, coffee residue, soil and manure, including 100% sand as control. The plots, with nine seeds each, were sown in 3.5×3.5×5.0 cm polypropylene trays, on an entirely randomized plot design. Plant height, root length, stem diameter, fresh and dry weight of shoots and roots and germination rate were evaluated. Soil and manure, followed by sand, had best results for germination and growth. Treatments containing coffee residue produced negative effect on germination, except the ones containing 20 to 40% coffee powder residue affecting emergence and growth. These findings support the possible allelopathic effect of coffee as secondary metabolites in plants as measured here by tomato germination, emergence and transplant growth. Still, further studies on the nature of inhibitory compounds and their subsequent elimination before use in substrate are suggested.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Soil and manure gave the best germination and growth, followed by sand.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Soil and manuree0
- Outcome
- germination and growthe0
- Direction
- beste0
- Comparator
- sande0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Soil and manure, followed by sand, had best results for germination and growth.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Coffee-residue treatments harmed tomato germination, except those with 20 to 40% residue.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Treatments containing coffee residuee0
- Outcome
- germinatione0
- Direction
- negative effecte0
- Qualifier
- except the ones containing 20 to 40% coffee powder residuee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Treatments containing coffee residue produced negative effect on germination, except the ones containing 20 to 40% coffee powder residue affecting emergence and growth.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors inferred possible allelopathic effects of coffee secondary metabolites on tomato germination, emergence and transplant growth.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Outcome
- tomato germination, emergence and transplant growthe0
- Qualifier
- possible allelopathic effect of coffee as secondary metabolitese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“These findings support the possible allelopathic effect of coffee as secondary metabolites in plants as measured here by tomato germination, emergence and transplant growth.”
The same questions in other papers
Coffea · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
664 papers more in this group
See all 668 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.