Paper · 2014

Influence of fertilization measures and spraying strategies on the fruit setting of organic grown pear trees.

Barbara Pfeiffer; S. Sinatsch

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The results of two different topics within the research project “Increasing crop safety and optimizing of crop loading of organic grown pome fruit” (FKZ 06OE197) founded by BOLN at the research institute LVWO Weinsberg, Southern Germany, are presented in this abstract. Potassium fertilisation of soil (2 x 80 kg K2O/ha) as well as spraying boron on the flowers and leaves three times during the blossom (total 2.5 kg B/ha) improved fruit setting and yield. With potassium and boron fertilisation more fruits smaller 60 mm were counted, furthermore with boron more small fruits were counted, too. Another topic was the reaction of five pear cultivars on different organic spraying strategies. Some organic fruit growers were under the impression that often a reduction of fruit-setting could be caused by use of sulphur. Results of this part of trials could not confirm this in every case, but clear reactions of cultivars, especially of ‘Conference’, on sprayings with wetting sulphur or lime sulphur were seen at evaluation of russetting of the fruits. Altogether the cultivar ‘Uta’ showed a good yield, but the worst compatibility of the leaves with the tested organic spraying strategies. ‘Gerburg’ had good yields, too, but seemed to be moderately susceptible for pear-scab in 2013.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium soil fertilisation improved fruit setting and yield.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Treatment
Potassium fertilisation of soil (2 x 80 kg K2O/ha)e0
Outcome
fruit setting and yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium fertilisation of soil (2 x 80 kg K2O/ha) as well as spraying boron on the flowers and leaves three times during the blossom (total 2.5 kg B/ha) improved fruit setting and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron sprays improved fruit setting and yield.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Treatment
spraying boron on the flowers and leaves three times during the blossom (total 2.5 kg B/ha)e0
Outcome
fruit setting and yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying boron on the flowers and leaves three times during the blossom (total 2.5 kg B/ha) improved fruit setting and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium and boron fertilisation increased counts of fruits below 60 mm.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Treatment
potassium and boron fertilisatione0
Outcome
fruits smaller 60 mme0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With potassium and boron fertilisation more fruits smaller 60 mm were counted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron also increased counts of small fruits.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Treatment
borone0
Outcome
small fruitse0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with boron more small fruits were counted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur did not consistently reduce fruit setting.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Treatment
sulphure1
Outcome
fruit-settinge1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of this part of trials could not confirm this in every case”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“a reduction of fruit-setting could be caused by use of sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wet or lime sulphur sprays caused cultivar reactions in fruit russetting, especially Conference.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Material
‘Conference’e0
Treatment
sprayings with wetting sulphur or lime sulphure0
Outcome
russetting of the fruitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clear reactions of cultivars, especially of ‘Conference’, on sprayings with wetting sulphur or lime sulphur were seen at evaluation of russetting of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uta had good yield.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Material
‘Uta’e0
Outcome
good yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivar ‘Uta’ showed a good yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uta had the worst leaf compatibility with organic spray strategies.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Material
‘Uta’e1
Outcome
compatibility of the leavese0
Direction
worste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the worst compatibility of the leaves with the tested organic spraying strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1191 · show in text ↑
e1

“the cultivar ‘Uta’ showed a good yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gerburg had good yields.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Material
‘Gerburg’e0
Outcome
good yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Gerburg’ had good yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gerburg appeared moderately susceptible to pear scab in 2013.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Material
‘Gerburg’e0
Interactor
pear-scabe0pathogen
Outcome
moderately susceptible for pear-scabe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Gerburg’ had good yields, too, but seemed to be moderately susceptible for pear-scab in 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

potassium · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.