Paper · 2015 · International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology

Evaluating Foliar Responses of Sunflower Genotypes under Drought Stress

Veli Pekcan; Göksel Evci; M. Ibrahim Yilmaz; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

As a summer crop, sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is influences commonly by drought stress due to growing generally in rain fed regions without irrigation. Drought affects severely not only seed yield both also other important yield traits which plays important roles on yield formation in sunflower. Therefore, drought resistance became one of the most important goals in the sunflower breeding programs in the world. The study was conducted to determine drought tolerance levels of sunflower genotypes under controlled environmental conditions in Edirne which is a border city in Trakya region which is European part of Turkey and has about 50% of Turkish sunflower production areas. Sunflower restores lines which developed in National Project were evaluated foliar responses against drought stress. Based on study results, the most affected foliar trait was leaf area and it was reduced until 75%. Similarly, leaf number of plants also influenced severely especially from earlier droughts and plants responded about 60% leaf number decreases. On the other hand, on the chlorophyll content of plant leaves, sunflower genotypes responded differently both in earlier (R.3) and later (R.5.1) plant growth stages. While chlorophyll content of sunflower lines increased about 40-50%, some of them decreased about 30%. Similarly, sunflower genotypes responded differently drought stress in their foliar traits depending on when stress applied early or late. As results, sunflower genotypes had different tolerance to drought and higher tolerant ones will be considered to develop tolerant hybrids and will be used as initial material for further breeding purposes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced sunflower leaf area by up to 75%.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Drought Stresst0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most affected foliar trait was leaf area and it was reduced until 75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Genotypes under Drought Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier drought reduced sunflower leaf number by about 60%.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
earlier droughtse0
Outcome
leaf numbere0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf number of plants also influenced severely especially from earlier droughts and plants responded about 60% leaf number decreases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some sunflower lines increased leaf chlorophyll content by about 40-50% under drought.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40-50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While chlorophyll content of sunflower lines increased about 40-50%, some of them decreased about 30%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1316 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower genotypes responded differently drought stress in their foliar traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other sunflower lines decreased leaf chlorophyll content by about 30% under drought.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While chlorophyll content of sunflower lines increased about 40-50%, some of them decreased about 30%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1316 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower genotypes responded differently drought stress in their foliar traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1407 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower foliar drought responses differed by genotype and whether stress was applied early or late.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
foliar traitse0
Direction
responded differentlye0
Qualifier
early or latee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sunflower genotypes responded differently drought stress in their foliar traits depending on when stress applied early or late”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1454 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower genotypes differed in drought tolerance.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome
tolerance to droughte0
Direction
differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sunflower genotypes had different tolerance to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1522 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose using more drought-tolerant sunflower genotypes to develop tolerant hybrids.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Outcome
develop tolerant hybridse0
Qualifier
higher tolerant onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher tolerant ones will be considered to develop tolerant hybrids and will be used as initial material for further breeding purposes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1661 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower genotypes had different tolerance to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1522 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

59 papers: 9 positive, 50 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.