Paper · 2013 · Trends in Biosciences/Trends in biosciences

Response of different boron and sulphur levels on chickpea based mustard intercropping system.

Sunil Kumar; S. K. Patel; Goutam Kumar Ghosh

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during the rabi of 2010 and 2011 on the Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, SHIATS, Allahabad to investigate the effect of Boron and Sulphur on growth and yield of chickpea under chickpea + mustard cropping system”. It consisted of four intercropping systems viz. sole chickpea, sole mustard, chickpea + mustard 4:1 and chickpea + mustard 5:1 put under six boron and sulphur levels i.e. control, borax 10 kg ha−1, boric acid 0.25% (three spray), sulphur 30 kg ha−1, borax 10 kg ha−1 + sulphur 30 kg ha−1 and boric acid 0.25% (three spray) + sulphur 30 kg ha−1. The experimental layout was factorial randomized block design with three replications during both the years of the study. Significantly increased dry weight, number pods per plant, number of grain per pod,100seed weight, grain yield q/ha and straw yield q/ha due to sole chickpea than intercropping of chickpea with mustard 5:1. Significantly higher dry weight, no. of siliqua per plant, 1000 seed weight, oil content was observed in chickpea with mustard (5:1 row ratio). This was followed by intercropping of chickpea with mustard 4:1row ratio. Borax 10 kg ha−1 + sulphur 30 kg ha1 gave the significantly highest dry weight, number pods per plant, number of grain per pod, 100-seed weight, grain yield q/ha and straw yield q/ha of chickpea followed by boric acid 0.25% trice spray + sulphur 30 kg ha−1. Minimum value of these parameters was recorded in control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole chickpea had significantly greater dry weight, pod number and grains per pod than chickpea intercropped with mustard 5:1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
sole chickpeae0
Outcome
dry weight, number pods per plant, number of grain per pode0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
intercropping of chickpea with mustard 5:1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly increased dry weight, number pods per plant, number of grain per pod,100seed weight, grain yield q/ha and straw yield q/ha due to sole chickpea than intercropping of chickpea with mustard 5:1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole chickpea had significantly greater 100-seed weight, grain yield and straw yield than the 5:1 intercrop.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
sole chickpeae0
Outcome
100seed weight, grain yield q/ha and straw yield q/hae0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
intercropping of chickpea with mustard 5:1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly increased dry weight, number pods per plant, number of grain per pod,100seed weight, grain yield q/ha and straw yield q/ha due to sole chickpea than intercropping of chickpea with mustard 5:1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5:1 chickpea-mustard intercrop had significantly higher mustard dry weight and siliqua number.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
chickpea with mustard (5:1 row ratio)e0
Outcome
dry weight, no. of siliqua per plante0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher dry weight, no. of siliqua per plant, 1000 seed weight, oil content was observed in chickpea with mustard (5:1 row ratio).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5:1 intercrop had significantly higher mustard 1000 seed weight and oil content.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
chickpea with mustard (5:1 row ratio)e0
Outcome
1000 seed weight, oil contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher dry weight, no. of siliqua per plant, 1000 seed weight, oil content was observed in chickpea with mustard (5:1 row ratio).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1069 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4:1 chickpea-mustard intercrop followed the 5:1 treatment for mustard traits.

Taxon
mustardt0
Outcome
intercropping of chickpea with mustard 4:1row ratioe0

Verbatim

e0

“This was followed by intercropping of chickpea with mustard 4:1row ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Borax plus sulphur gave the significantly highest chickpea dry weight, pods and grains per pod.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Borax 10 kg ha−1 + sulphur 30 kg ha1e0
Outcome
dry weight, number pods per plant, number of grain per pode0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
boric acid 0.25% trice spray + sulphur 30 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Borax 10 kg ha−1 + sulphur 30 kg ha1 gave the significantly highest dry weight, number pods per plant, number of grain per pod, 100-seed weight, grain yield q/ha and straw yield q/ha of chickpea followed by boric acid 0.25% trice spray + sulphur 30 kg ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Borax plus sulphur gave the significantly highest chickpea seed weight and grain and straw yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Borax 10 kg ha−1 + sulphur 30 kg ha1e0
Outcome
100-seed weight, grain yield q/ha and straw yield q/hae0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
boric acid 0.25% trice spray + sulphur 30 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Borax 10 kg ha−1 + sulphur 30 kg ha1 gave the significantly highest dry weight, number pods per plant, number of grain per pod, 100-seed weight, grain yield q/ha and straw yield q/ha of chickpea followed by boric acid 0.25% trice spray + sulphur 30 kg ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1401 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had the minimum values of the chickpea parameters.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
these parameterse0
Direction
Minimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum value of these parameters was recorded in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–58 · show in text ↑

borax · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

37 papers: 37 positive, 0 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.