Paper · 2016 · Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika

EVALUATION OF RHIZOBIUM EFFICIENCY IN CHICKPEA THROUGH BORON MANAGEMENT

Shrila Das; Kaustav Aditya; Man Singh

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the Rhizobium efficiency in chickpea through boron management. The study was carried out during Rabi season of 2006-07 at the Crop Research Centre, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. The experimental soil was neutral sandy loam with organic carbon of 0.73 per cent, available N and P of 163.07 and 12.33 kg/ha and 0.84, 1.33 and 0.3 mg/kg available Zinc, Boron and Molybdenum, respectively. The total bacterial counts in the initial sample were 5.83x105 CFU/g soil, fungi of 2.90x103 propagules/g soil and dehydrogenase activity was 40.29 µg/ TPF/g soil/24 h. Six treatments consisting combinations of Boron with and without Rhizobium sp. inoculation, were laid out in randomized block design (RBD) in triplicate. Rhizobium inoculation gave significant increase of 32.60% in nodule dry weight at 75 DAS over control. Among the two levels of boron, 10 kg Borax/ha was found superiorto 5 kg Borax/ha for different studied parameters. Combined application of Rhizobium and 5 kg Borax/ha showed better and positive effect on nodulation, plant dry weight, uptake and yield of chickpea than the 10 kg Borax/ha. The highest grain yield of 2977 kg/ha was recorded due to inoculation with Rhizobium + 10 kg Borax/ha. Boron application in combination with Rhizobium also influenced the dehydrogenase activity significantly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased chickpea nodule dry weight by 32.60% at 75 DAS compared with the control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
nodule dry weighte1
Direction
increasee1
Value
32.60%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF RHIZOBIUM EFFICIENCY IN CHICKPEA THROUGH BORON MANAGEMENT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation gave significant increase of 32.60% in nodule dry weight at 75 DAS over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of two boron levels, 10 kg Borax/ha was superior to 5 kg Borax/ha for the different studied parameters in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
10 kg Borax/hae1
Outcome
different studied parameterse1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
5 kg Borax/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF RHIZOBIUM EFFICIENCY IN CHICKPEA THROUGH BORON MANAGEMENT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the two levels of boron, 10 kg Borax/ha was found superiorto 5 kg Borax/ha for different studied parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application of Rhizobium and 5 kg Borax/ha had a better, positive effect on nodulation and plant dry weight of chickpea than 10 kg Borax/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Combined application of Rhizobium and 5 kg Borax/hae1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
nodulation, plant dry weighte1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
10 kg Borax/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Combined application of Rhizobium and 5 kg Borax/ha showed better and positive effect on nodulation, plant dry weight, uptake and yield of chickpea than the 10 kg Borax/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application of Rhizobium and 5 kg Borax/ha had a better, positive effect on uptake and yield of chickpea than 10 kg Borax/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Combined application of Rhizobium and 5 kg Borax/hae1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
uptake and yielde1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
10 kg Borax/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Combined application of Rhizobium and 5 kg Borax/ha showed better and positive effect on nodulation, plant dry weight, uptake and yield of chickpea than the 10 kg Borax/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest chickpea grain yield, 2977 kg/ha, was recorded with Rhizobium inoculation plus 10 kg Borax/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculation with Rhizobium + 10 kg Borax/hae1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2977 kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF RHIZOBIUM EFFICIENCY IN CHICKPEA THROUGH BORON MANAGEMENT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest grain yield of 2977 kg/ha was recorded due to inoculation with Rhizobium + 10 kg Borax/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron application in combination with Rhizobium significantly influenced dehydrogenase activity.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Boron application in combination with Rhizobiume1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
dehydrogenase activitye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF RHIZOBIUM EFFICIENCY IN CHICKPEA THROUGH BORON MANAGEMENT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Boron application in combination with Rhizobium also influenced the dehydrogenase activity significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1369 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

borax · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

borax · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.