Paper · 2012 · Range Management and Agroforestry

Productivity, quality, nitrate-N and disease incidence in fodder pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) as influenced by irrigation and nitrogen levels

U. S. Tiwana; Ajaib Singh; Upasana Rani

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Fodder yield, quality NO3-N concentration and disease prevalence (leaf spots and downy mildew) in pearl millet were evaluated under different irrigation and N levels in Kharif 2010 and 2011. Green fodder and dry matter yield of pearl millet increased significantly with increase in N levels upto 75 kg N/ha (535.8 and 116.4 q/ha) due to improvement in yield attributes like plant height, tillers/plant and number of leaves per plant. The highest level of nitrogen (150 kg N/ha) resulted in reduced in fodder yield due to lodging of the crop. The irrigated crop gave significantly higher fodder yield than un-irrigated and magnitude of increase was 15.9%. Crude protein content increased from 7.05% in control to 9.46% at 150 kg N/ha. The high crude protein content (8.50%) was obtained in un-irrigated as compared to irrigated (8.01%) crop. The NO3-N concentration in pearl millet fodder increased with increase in nitrogen levels upto 150 kg N/ha under both irrigated and un-irrigated conditions but was below toxic limit of 2000 ppm. The NO3-N concentration was more under un-irrigated conditions. Downy mildew disease incidence in pearl millet was maximum (7.33%) at 150kg N/ha as compared to 1.95% in control under irrigated conditions. Similar trend was observed in percent severity of leaf spots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green fodder and dry matter yield increased significantly up to 75 kg N/ha.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
N levels upto 75 kg N/hae0
Outcome
Green fodder and dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green fodder and dry matter yield of pearl millet increased significantly with increase in N levels upto 75 kg N/ha (535.8 and 116.4 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–329 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, tillers and leaf number improved.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
plant height, tillers/plant and number of leaves per plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“due to improvement in yield attributes like plant height, tillers/plant and number of leaves per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–432 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nitrogen level reduced fodder yield because of lodging.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
nitrogen (150 kg N/ha)e0
Outcome
fodder yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
due to lodging of the crope0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest level of nitrogen (150 kg N/ha) resulted in reduced in fodder yield due to lodging of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased fodder yield by 15.9% versus no irrigation.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
irrigatede0
Outcome
fodder yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.9%e0
Comparator
un-irrigatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigated crop gave significantly higher fodder yield than un-irrigated and magnitude of increase was 15.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein content rose from 7.05% in controls to 9.46% at 150 kg N/ha.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
150 kg N/hae0
Outcome
Crude protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.46%e0
Qualifier
7.05%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crude protein content increased from 7.05% in control to 9.46% at 150 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unirrigated crops had higher crude protein than irrigated crops.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
un-irrigatede0
Outcome
crude protein contente0
Direction
highe0
Value
8.50%e0
Qualifier
8.01%e0
Comparator
irrigatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high crude protein content (8.50%) was obtained in un-irrigated as compared to irrigated (8.01%) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fodder NO3-N increased with nitrogen levels up to 150 kg N/ha under both irrigation conditions.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
nitrogen levels upto 150 kg N/hae0
Outcome
NO3-N concentration in pearl millet foddere0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
below toxic limit of 2000 ppme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NO3-N concentration in pearl millet fodder increased with increase in nitrogen levels upto 150 kg N/ha under both irrigated and un-irrigated conditions but was below toxic limit of 2000 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fodder NO3-N concentration was higher without irrigation.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
un-irrigated conditionse0
Outcome
NO3-N concentratione0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NO3-N concentration was more under un-irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Downy mildew incidence reached 7.33% at 150 kg N/ha versus 1.95% in controls under irrigation.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
150kg N/hae0
Outcome
Downy mildew disease incidencee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.33%e0
Qualifier
1.95%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Downy mildew disease incidence in pearl millet was maximum (7.33%) at 150kg N/ha as compared to 1.95% in control under irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1239 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf spot severity showed a similar trend to downy mildew incidence.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
percent severity of leaf spotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trend was observed in percent severity of leaf spots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · disease · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

150 papers: 144 positive, 6 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.