Abstract
An attempt was made to study the pollen-pistil interactions in mango cv. Amrapali as a result of self-, open- and cross-pollination with cv. Sensation. It was observed that self-pollination in Amrapali resulted in rapid decline in fruit retention than open- and cross-pollination (Amrapali × Sensation) during 20 days after pollination (DAP). Out of 1,133 self-pollinated flowers, only three fruits (0.26%) were observed after 25 days of pollination. In contrast, cross-pollination with Sensation (637 flowers) resulted in 32 fruits (5.02%) after 25 days of pollination. It was also evident that regardless of pollination method, flower and fruit drop were more pronounced during first 20 days after pollination. Results of the present investigation clearly indicate that ‘Amrapali’ does not favour self-pollination. However, cross-pollination results in substantial fruit set.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Self-pollinated Amrapali had faster fruit retention decline than open or cross-pollinated flowers over 20 days.
- Taxon
- mango
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicat0 - Material
- Amrapalie0
- Treatment
- self-pollinatione0
- Outcome
- fruit retentione0
- Direction
- rapid declinee0
- Qualifier
- during 20 days after pollination (DAP)e0
- Comparator
- open- and cross-pollinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“self-pollination in Amrapali resulted in rapid decline in fruit retention than open- and cross-pollination (Amrapali × Sensation) during 20 days after pollination (DAP).”
t0“mango cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Three of 1,133 self-pollinated flowers set fruit at 25 days (0.26%).
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- self-pollinatede0
- Outcome
- fruitse0
- Value
- 0.26%e0
- Qualifier
- after 25 days of pollinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Out of 1,133 self-pollinated flowers, only three fruits (0.26%) were observed after 25 days of pollination.”
t0“mango cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Cross-pollination with Sensation gave 32 fruits (5.02%) after 25 days.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Material
- Sensatione0
- Treatment
- cross-pollination with Sensatione0
- Outcome
- fruitse0
- Value
- 5.02%e0
- Qualifier
- after 25 days of pollinatione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cross-pollination with Sensation (637 flowers) resulted in 32 fruits (5.02%) after 25 days of pollination.”
t0“mango cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Flower and fruit drop was greater in the first 20 days regardless of pollination method.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Outcome
- flower and fruit drope0
- Direction
- more pronouncede0
- Qualifier
- during first 20 days after pollinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“regardless of pollination method, flower and fruit drop were more pronounced during first 20 days after pollination.”
t0“mango cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors concluded Amrapali does not favor self-pollination and cross-pollination yields substantial fruit set.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Material
- Amrapalie0
- Outcome
- cross-pollination results in substantial fruit sete0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“‘Amrapali’ does not favour self-pollination. However, cross-pollination results in substantial fruit set.”
t0“mango cultivar”
The same questions in other papers
pollination · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.