Paper · 2012 · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)

Effects of Selenium Application on Heat Tolerance in Peanut Seedlings

Chad Benton

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Peanut production faces many challenges in the world today, and one such issue is heat stress. One of the implications of heat stress on the plants is oxidative stress, which is detrimental to plant health and physiological function. A method to combat oxidative stress could be through the use of antioxidants such as Selenium (Se), which is thought to increase growth and development of plant material. This experiment evaluated tolerance to heat stress in four-week-old seedlings from a set of diverse peanut genotypes. Additionally, the antioxidant activity of Selenium was examined to determine if a) it allowed for increased heat tolerance, and b) if it was associated with specific genotypes. At the conclusion of the treatments, SPAD chlorophyll measurements and fresh-weights were taken, with dry-weights being calculated after seedlings were oven-dried at 80˚C for 48 hours. The experiment concluded that Se did not produce a significant change in tolerance to heat stress. Genotype had a significant effect on SPAD chlorophyll readings and dry-weight. Additionally, temperature did not have a significant effect on dry-weight, but did on SPAD chlorophyll readings and fresh-weight. The effect of temperature on SPAD readings is of interest as the above optimal temperature of 39˚C produced higher relative chlorophyll contents than the 26˚C normal temperature. Due to this result, seedling total leaf area (LA) was further measured to determine if a potential trend could exist. Even though not statistically significant, LA was slightly smaller for seedlings at 39˚C treatment compared to the 26˚C treatment. In summary, the experiment did not discover genotypes that allowed for a significant improvement in tolerance to above-optimal temperatures or validate Se as an additive for increased tolerance to heat stress and improved seedling growth. However, it did demonstrate the ability of peanut seedlings to withstand an increase in temperature at an early stage without significant detrimental impacts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium did not significantly change peanut seedling heat tolerance.

Treatment
See0
Outcome
tolerance to heat stresse0
Direction
did not produce a significant changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Se did not produce a significant change in tolerance to heat stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype significantly affected peanut seedling SPAD chlorophyll readings.

Material
Genotypee0
Outcome
SPAD chlorophyll readingse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype had a significant effect on SPAD chlorophyll readings and dry-weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype significantly affected peanut seedling dry weight.

Material
Genotypee0
Outcome
dry-weighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype had a significant effect on SPAD chlorophyll readings and dry-weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature did not significantly affect peanut seedling dry weight.

Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
dry-weighte0
Direction
did not have a significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“temperature did not have a significant effect on dry-weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature significantly affected peanut seedling SPAD chlorophyll readings.

Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
SPAD chlorophyll readingse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“temperature did not have a significant effect on dry-weight, but did on SPAD chlorophyll readings and fresh-weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature significantly affected peanut seedling fresh weight.

Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
fresh-weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“temperature did not have a significant effect on dry-weight, but did on SPAD chlorophyll readings and fresh-weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut seedlings at 39˚C had higher relative chlorophyll than seedlings at 26˚C.

Treatment
39˚Ce0
Outcome
relative chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
26˚Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“above optimal temperature of 39˚C produced higher relative chlorophyll contents than the 26˚C normal temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut seedlings at 39˚C had slightly smaller leaf area than those at 26˚C, without statistical significance.

Treatment
39˚C treatmente0
Outcome
LAe0
Direction
slightly smallere0
Comparator
26˚C treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even though not statistically significant, LA was slightly smaller for seedlings at 39˚C treatment compared to the 26˚C treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1620 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No genotype significantly improved peanut seedling tolerance to above-optimal temperatures.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
tolerance to above-optimal temperaturese0
Direction
did not discovere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the experiment did not discover genotypes that allowed for a significant improvement in tolerance to above-optimal temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that peanut seedlings withstood higher temperature early in development without significant harm.

Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Outcome
without significant detrimental impactse0
Qualifier
at an early stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peanut seedlings to withstand an increase in temperature at an early stage without significant detrimental impacts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1903–2018 · show in text ↑

selenium atom · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.