Abstract
The field experiment was carried out during the winter seasons of 1994–95 and 1995–96 at National Research Centre for Weed Science, Jabalpur, M. P. The experiment was laid out in randomised block design consisting of ninet reatments. The data revealed that isoproturon 1kg/ha in combination with 2, 4–0 0.5 kg/ha applied at 30 days after sowing (DAS) gave the least weed dry weight as well as minimum number of weed plants. As far as yield was concerned, isoproturon 1.0 kg coupled with 2, 4-D 0.5 kg/ha gave the highest yield which was at par with isoproturon 1.5 kg/ha alone. Higher grain yield was recorded due to better weed control efficiency and higher crop dry matter production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
The combination produced the least weed dry weight.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- isoproturon 1kg/ha in combination with 2, 4–0 0.5 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- weed dry weighte0
- Direction
- leaste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“isoproturon 1kg/ha in combination with 2, 4–0 0.5 kg/ha applied at 30 days after sowing (DAS) gave the least weed dry weight”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination produced the minimum number of weed plants.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- isoproturon 1kg/ha in combination with 2, 4–0 0.5 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- number of weed plantse0
- Direction
- minimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“isoproturon 1kg/ha in combination with 2, 4–0 0.5 kg/ha applied at 30 days after sowing (DAS) gave the least weed dry weight as well as minimum number of weed plants”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination gave the highest yield and was at par with isoproturon alone.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- isoproturon 1.0 kg coupled with 2, 4-D 0.5 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- isoproturon 1.5 kg/ha alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“isoproturon 1.0 kg coupled with 2, 4-D 0.5 kg/ha gave the highest yield which was at par with isoproturon 1.5 kg/ha alone”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher grain yield was attributed to better weed control and crop dry matter production.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Qualifier
- better weed control efficiency and higher crop dry matter productione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher grain yield was recorded due to better weed control efficiency and higher crop dry matter production”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
85 papers more in this group
See all 89 papers →2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
112 papers more in this group
See all 116 papers →isoproturon · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
70 papers more in this group
See all 74 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.