Abstract
A field study was conducted during kharif 1997–1999 to study the response of confectionery groundnut variety ICGV 86564 to micronutrients. The pooled results revealed that application of zinc sulphate, borax and ferrous sulphate either alone or in combination registered significant and maximum values of growth and yield attributes and pod yield of groundnut over control. Among the different treatments, combined application of zinc sulphate @ 5 kg ha−l + borax @ 5 kg ha−l + ferrous sulphate @ 10 kg ha−1 significantly recorded the maximum pod yield of 2209 kg ha−1 which is 23.6% increase over control. The maximum net return of 20085 ha−1 and a benefit cost ratio of 1.53 was also observed with the same treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc sulphate, borax and ferrous sulphate, alone or combined, gave significant and maximum growth and yield attributes and pod yield of groundnut over control.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Material
- ICGV 86564e2
- Treatment
- application of zinc sulphate, borax and ferrous sulphatee1
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributes and pod yielde1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Comparator
- controle1
- Setting
- field studye2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“application of zinc sulphate, borax and ferrous sulphate either alone or in combination registered significant and maximum values of growth and yield attributes and pod yield of groundnut over control”
e2“A field study was conducted during kharif 1997–1999 to study the response of confectionery groundnut variety ICGV 86564 to micronutrients”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum net return from groundnut with the combined micronutrient treatment was 20085 ha−1.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae2
- Outcome
- net returne5
- Value
- 20085 ha−1e5
- Qualifier
- with the same treatmente5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“A field study was conducted during kharif 1997–1999 to study the response of confectionery groundnut variety ICGV 86564 to micronutrients”
e5“The maximum net return of 20085 ha−1 and a benefit cost ratio of 1.53 was also observed with the same treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
The benefit cost ratio of groundnut with the combined micronutrient treatment was 1.53.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae2
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe5
- Value
- 1.53e5
- Qualifier
- with the same treatmente5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“A field study was conducted during kharif 1997–1999 to study the response of confectionery groundnut variety ICGV 86564 to micronutrients”
e5“The maximum net return of 20085 ha−1 and a benefit cost ratio of 1.53 was also observed with the same treatment”
The same questions in other papers
sulfate · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
borax · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →zinc sulfate · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
27 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.