Abstract
Field experiments were conducted at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Tirupati on sandy loamy soils to determine whether soil amendment with organic (Farm Yard Manure) and inorganic manures (N, P, K, Gypsum, Lime and Zinc sulphate) affect the severity of dry root rot in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. Farm Yard Manure, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, gypsum (calcium sulphate), lime (calcium hydroxide) and Zinc (Zinc sulphate) were evaluated alone and/or in various combinations. Combined doses of inorganic manures (20 Kg N + 10 Kg P + 25 Kg + 250 Kg Gypsum + 25 Kg Zinc sulphate (once in three years) proved best out of all treatments tried. It reduced dry root incidence (31.64%) and gave the highest pod yield (20.42 q/ha). Farm Yard Manure applied at 5 tonnes/ha, once in three years was found nearly as effective as the above treatment in reducing the dry root rot to 32.28% and increasing the yield upto 20.42 Q/ha. Nitrogen at 20 kg/ha has reduced the disease incidence significantly over the control. However it has failed to increase the pod yield significantly over the control. The other treatments, 10 kg P and 25 Kg K individually were found ineffective in reducing the disease incidence and increasing the yield. However the combination of N P K was.found to be effective in controlling the disease and increasing yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Combined inorganic manures reduced dry root incidence to 31.64%.
- Taxon
- Groundnut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Combined doses of inorganic manures (20 Kg N + 10 Kg P + 25 Kg + 250 Kg Gypsum + 25 Kg Zinc sulphate (once in three years)e0
- Outcome
- dry root incidencee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 31.64%e0
- Comparator
- all treatments triede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Combined doses of inorganic manures (20 Kg N + 10 Kg P + 25 Kg + 250 Kg Gypsum + 25 Kg Zinc sulphate (once in three years) proved best out of all treatments tried. It reduced dry root incidence (31.64%) and gave the highest pod yield (20.42 q/ha).”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined inorganic manures highest pod yield to 20.42 q/ha.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Combined doses of inorganic manures (20 Kg N + 10 Kg P + 25 Kg + 250 Kg Gypsum + 25 Kg Zinc sulphate (once in three years)e0
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 20.42 q/hae0
- Comparator
- all treatments triede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Combined doses of inorganic manures (20 Kg N + 10 Kg P + 25 Kg + 250 Kg Gypsum + 25 Kg Zinc sulphate (once in three years) proved best out of all treatments tried. It reduced dry root incidence (31.64%) and gave the highest pod yield (20.42 q/ha).”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Farm Yard Manure was nearly as effective, reducing dry root rot to 32.28%.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Farm Yard Manure applied at 5 tonnes/ha, once in three yearse0
- Outcome
- dry root rote0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Value
- 32.28%e0
- Comparator
- the above treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Farm Yard Manure applied at 5 tonnes/ha, once in three years was found nearly as effective as the above treatment in reducing the dry root rot to 32.28% and increasing the yield upto 20.42 Q/ha.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Farm Yard Manure was nearly as effective, increasing yield to 20.42 Q/ha.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Farm Yard Manure applied at 5 tonnes/ha, once in three yearse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 20.42 Q/hae0
- Comparator
- the above treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Farm Yard Manure applied at 5 tonnes/ha, once in three years was found nearly as effective as the above treatment in reducing the dry root rot to 32.28% and increasing the yield upto 20.42 Q/ha.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen at 20 kg/ha significantly reduced disease incidence over control.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Nitrogen at 20 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen at 20 kg/ha has reduced the disease incidence significantly over the control. However it has failed to increase the pod yield significantly over the control.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen did not significantly increase pod yield over control.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Nitrogen at 20 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
- Direction
- failed to increasee0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen at 20 kg/ha has reduced the disease incidence significantly over the control. However it has failed to increase the pod yield significantly over the control.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
10 kg P was ineffective for disease incidence.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- 10 kg Pe0
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The other treatments, 10 kg P and 25 Kg K individually were found ineffective in reducing the disease incidence and increasing the yield.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
10 kg P was ineffective for yield.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- 10 kg Pe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The other treatments, 10 kg P and 25 Kg K individually were found ineffective in reducing the disease incidence and increasing the yield.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
25 Kg K was ineffective for disease incidence.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- 25 Kg Ke0
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The other treatments, 10 kg P and 25 Kg K individually were found ineffective in reducing the disease incidence and increasing the yield.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
25 Kg K was ineffective for yield.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- 25 Kg Ke0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The other treatments, 10 kg P and 25 Kg K individually were found ineffective in reducing the disease incidence and increasing the yield.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The N P K combination was effective in controlling disease.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- combination of N P Ke0
- Outcome
- diseasee0
- Direction
- controllinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However the combination of N P K was.found to be effective in controlling the disease and increasing yield.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The N P K combination was effective in increasing yield.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- combination of N P Ke0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However the combination of N P K was.found to be effective in controlling the disease and increasing yield.”
t0“Groundnut”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
27 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →potassium · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
90 papers more in this group
See all 94 papers →nitrogen · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
141 papers more in this group
See all 145 papers →phosphorus · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 160 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
174 papers more in this group
See all 178 papers →potassium · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
phosphorus · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →lime · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →fertilization · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.