Paper · 2000 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

On‐farm diagnosis and management of iron chlorosis in groundnut

P. V. Vara Prasad; V. Satyanarayana; M. V. Potdar; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Iron (Fe) chlorosis is a major nutritional constraint to groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) productivity in many parts of the world. On‐farm research was conducted at a Fe‐chlorotic site to evaluate the performance of three genotypes (TMV‐2, ICGS‐11, and ICGV‐86031), three fertilizer practices [no fertilizer control, fanners practice (125: 200: 0 kg NPK ha−1), recommended practice (20: 50: 30 kg NPK ha−1)], and two Fe treatments (non‐sprayed control and foliar FeSO4 sprays) for their effect on Fe‐chlorosis and haulm and pod yields. These treatments were tested in a strip‐split plot design with four replicates. Results revealed that TMV‐2 and ICGS‐11 were susceptible to Fe‐chlorosis and produced significantly smaller haulm and pod yield, whereas, ICGV‐8603 1 was tolerant to Fe‐chlorosis. Farmer's fertilizer practice had the highest incidence of Fe‐chlorosis. Extractable Fe and chlorophyll content in the fresh leaves were the best indices of Fe‐status and were significantly (P<0.01) correlated with visual chlorosis ratings. Foliar application of FeSO4 (0.5 w/ v) was effective in correcting Fe‐chlorosis and increased pod yield by about 30 to 40% in susceptible genotypes. These results suggests that use of tolerant genotypes such as ICGV‐86031 or foliar application of FeSO4 in susceptible genotypes such as TMV‐2 and ICGS‐11 in combination with recommended fertilizer levels is an effective management package for alleviating Fe‐chlorosis in groundnut. Notes Corresponding author (e‐mail address: vvpagadala@hotmail.com).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TMV-2 and ICGS-11 groundnut genotypes were susceptible to Fe chlorosis.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Material
TMV‐2 and ICGS‐11e1
Outcome
susceptible to Fe‐chlorosise1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“TMV‐2 and ICGS‐11 were susceptible to Fe‐chlorosis and produced significantly smaller haulm and pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–751 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TMV-2 and ICGS-11 produced significantly smaller haulm and pod yield.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Material
TMV‐2 and ICGS‐11e1
Outcome
haulm and pod yielde1
Direction
smallere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“TMV‐2 and ICGS‐11 were susceptible to Fe‐chlorosis and produced significantly smaller haulm and pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–751 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICGV-8603 1 groundnut genotype was tolerant to Fe chlorosis.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Material
ICGV‐8603 1e6
Outcome
tolerant to Fe‐chlorosise6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“ICGV‐8603 1 was tolerant to Fe‐chlorosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmer fertilizer practice had the highest incidence of Fe chlorosis.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Farmer's fertilizer practicee2
Outcome
incidence of Fe‐chlorosise2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“Farmer's fertilizer practice had the highest incidence of Fe‐chlorosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–874 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extractable Fe and chlorophyll content in fresh leaves were significantly correlated with visual chlorosis ratings.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Compound
Extractable Fe and chlorophyll contente3
Outcome
visual chlorosis ratingse3
Qualifier
significantly (P<0.01)e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“Extractable Fe and chlorophyll content in the fresh leaves were the best indices of Fe‐status and were significantly (P<0.01) correlated with visual chlorosis ratings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1042 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extractable Fe and chlorophyll content in fresh leaves were the best indices of Fe status.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Organ / stage
fresh leavese3
Outcome
best indices of Fe‐statuse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“Extractable Fe and chlorophyll content in the fresh leaves were the best indices of Fe‐status and were significantly (P<0.01) correlated with visual chlorosis ratings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar FeSO4 application was effective in correcting Fe chlorosis compared with a non-sprayed control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Foliar application of FeSO4 (0.5 w/ v)e4
Outcome
correcting Fe‐chlorosise4
Direction
effectivee4
Comparator
non‐sprayed controle7

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“Foliar application of FeSO4 (0.5 w/ v) was effective in correcting Fe‐chlorosis and increased pod yield by about 30 to 40% in susceptible genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1191 · show in text ↑
e7

“two Fe treatments (non‐sprayed control and foliar FeSO4 sprays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar FeSO4 application increased pod yield by about 30 to 40% in susceptible groundnut genotypes compared with a non-sprayed control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Material
susceptible genotypese4
Treatment
Foliar application of FeSO4 (0.5 w/ v)e4
Outcome
pod yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Value
30 to 40%e4
Comparator
non‐sprayed controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“Foliar application of FeSO4 (0.5 w/ v) was effective in correcting Fe‐chlorosis and increased pod yield by about 30 to 40% in susceptible genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1191 · show in text ↑
e7

“two Fe treatments (non‐sprayed control and foliar FeSO4 sprays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–484 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant genotypes or foliar FeSO4 in susceptible genotypes, combined with recommended fertilizer levels, is an effective management package for alleviating Fe chlorosis in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
alleviating Fe‐chlorosise5
Qualifier
in combination with recommended fertilizer levelse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“in combination with recommended fertilizer levels is an effective management package for alleviating Fe‐chlorosis in groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1474 · show in text ↑

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

application · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 215 positive, 7 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.