Paper · 1996 · Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation

THE RELATIVE MERITS OF DOLOMITIC AND CALCITIC LIMESTONE IN DETOXIFYING AND RE VE GET A TING ACIDIC, NICKEL- AND COPPER-CONTAMINATED SOILS IN THE SUDBURY MINING AND SMELTING REGION OF CANADA

Derek McHale; Keith Winterhalder

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Soils in the Sudbury mining and smelting region have been rendered phytotoxic and barren by acidification and particulate metal contamination, but can be detoxified and revegetated by the surface application of ground limestone. On certain barren sites, plant growth is better on soil treated with dolomitic limestone than with calcitic limestone, and greenhouse experiments using mung beans (Vigna radiata) have shown superior root and shoot growth on certain contaminated soils when the limestone is dolomitic rather than calcitic. Results of experiments with species used in revegetation (Agrostis gigantea and Lotus corniculatus) suggest that leguminous species are more sensitive to Ca:Mg ratio than grasses, that the plant response to this ratio is greater at lower liming levels, and that the response is more marked on more toxic soils. The effects of calcium:magnesium ratio of the limestone used in revegetating acidic, metal-contaminated soils are clearly complex, interactive and difficult to interpret. Further studies are needed, but meanwhile it is recommended that the practice of using dolomitic limestone to detoxify barren Sudbury soils be continued, since there is a risk of induced magnesium deficiency at certain sites when calcitic limestone is used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth on some barren sites was better with dolomitic than calcitic limestone.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
dolomitic limestonee0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
calcitic limestonee0

Verbatim

e0

“On certain barren sites, plant growth is better on soil treated with dolomitic limestone than with calcitic limestone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mung bean roots and shoots grew better with dolomitic than calcitic limestone.

Taxon
mung beans (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0
Treatment
dolomitice0
Outcome
root and shoot growthe0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
calcitice0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments using mung beans (Vigna radiata) have shown superior root and shoot growth on certain contaminated soils when the limestone is dolomitic rather than calcitic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–532 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leguminous species appeared more sensitive to Ca:Mg ratio than grasses.

Taxon
leguminous speciese0
Outcome
sensitive to Ca:Mg ratioe0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
grassese0

Verbatim

e0

“leguminous species are more sensitive to Ca:Mg ratio than grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–712 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant response to the ratio was greater at lower liming levels.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
lower liming levelse0
Outcome
plant responsee0
Direction
greatere0

Verbatim

e0

“the plant response to this ratio is greater at lower liming levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–785 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The response was more marked on more toxic soils.

Taxon
plante1
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
more markede0
Setting
more toxic soilse0

Verbatim

e0

“the response is more marked on more toxic soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“VE GET A TING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“On certain barren sites, plant growth is better on soil treated with dolomitic limestone than with calcitic limestone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–346 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend continuing dolomitic limestone on barren Sudbury soils.

Taxon
plante1
Outcome
practice of using dolomitic limestone to detoxify barren Sudbury soils be continuede0

Verbatim

e0

“it is recommended that the practice of using dolomitic limestone to detoxify barren Sudbury soils be continued”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“VE GET A TING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“On certain barren sites, plant growth is better on soil treated with dolomitic limestone than with calcitic limestone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–346 · show in text ↑

lime · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.