Paper · 2011 · Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of different irrigation water levels and planting patterns on Egyptian cotton productivity and some water relations

Hany S. Gharib; M. E. Meleha

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) cultivar “Giza 86” was grown on a clay soil at Water Management Research Station at El-Karada, Kafrelshiekh, Egypt, during 2009 and 2010 seasons, to study the effect of five irrigation levels and two planting patterns on growth, yields and yield components and some water relations. Irrigation was applied every 14 days with different water amounts equal to 110, 100, 90, 85 and 80% of soil moisture content in root zone (0-60 cm depth) of field capacity (FC). The two planting patterns gave two distributions of the optimum plant population for this cultivar (51852 plants /feddan) on one side of 60 cm ridges or two sides of 90 cm beds. There were no significant differences between the two planting patterns in dry weight per plant, leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), final plant height, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, seed index, lint %, seed oil % , seed cotton yield , lint yield and oil yield in both seasons. Application of irrigation water every 14 days interval with different water amounts had a significant effect on all growth and agronomic traits in the two seasons. Adding irrigation water with amount equal to 110% of soil moisture content of FC resulted in a significant increase in dry weight per plant, LAI, CGR and plant height, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, seed index, lint %, seed oil % , seed cotton yield , lint yield and oil yield compared * Corresponding author: Hany S. Gharib E-mail address: hanysony@yahoo.com

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting patterns did not significantly differ in dry weight, leaf area index or crop growth rate in either season.

Taxon
Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
two planting patternse0
Outcome
dry weight per plant, leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR)e0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences between the two planting patterns in dry weight per plant, leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), final plant height, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, seed index, lint %, seed oil % , seed cotton yield , lint yield and oil yield in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egyptian cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting patterns did not significantly differ in final height, open boll number or boll weight.

Taxon
Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
two planting patternse0
Outcome
final plant height, number of open bolls per plant, boll weighte0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences between the two planting patterns in dry weight per plant, leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), final plant height, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, seed index, lint %, seed oil % , seed cotton yield , lint yield and oil yield in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egyptian cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting patterns did not significantly differ in seed index, lint percentage or seed oil percentage.

Taxon
Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
two planting patternse0
Outcome
seed index, lint %, seed oil %e0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences between the two planting patterns in dry weight per plant, leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), final plant height, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, seed index, lint %, seed oil % , seed cotton yield , lint yield and oil yield in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egyptian cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting patterns did not significantly differ in seed cotton, lint or oil yield.

Taxon
Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
two planting patternse0
Outcome
seed cotton yield , lint yield and oil yielde0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences between the two planting patterns in dry weight per plant, leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), final plant height, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, seed index, lint %, seed oil % , seed cotton yield , lint yield and oil yield in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egyptian cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water amounts significantly affected all growth and agronomic traits in both seasons.

Taxon
Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
Application of irrigation water every 14 days interval with different water amountse0
Outcome
all growth and agronomic traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of irrigation water every 14 days interval with different water amounts had a significant effect on all growth and agronomic traits in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egyptian cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 110% of field-capacity soil moisture significantly increased dry weight, LAI and CGR.

Taxon
Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
Adding irrigation water with amount equal to 110% of soil moisture content of FCe0
Outcome
dry weight per plant, LAI, CGRe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding irrigation water with amount equal to 110% of soil moisture content of FC resulted in a significant increase in dry weight per plant, LAI, CGR and plant height, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, seed index, lint %, seed oil % , seed cotton yield , lint yield and oil yield compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egyptian cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 110% of field-capacity soil moisture significantly increased height, open boll number and boll weight.

Taxon
Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
Adding irrigation water with amount equal to 110% of soil moisture content of FCe0
Outcome
plant height, number of open bolls per plant, boll weighte0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding irrigation water with amount equal to 110% of soil moisture content of FC resulted in a significant increase in dry weight per plant, LAI, CGR and plant height, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, seed index, lint %, seed oil % , seed cotton yield , lint yield and oil yield compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egyptian cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 110% of field-capacity soil moisture significantly increased seed index, lint percentage and seed oil percentage.

Taxon
Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
Adding irrigation water with amount equal to 110% of soil moisture content of FCe0
Outcome
seed index, lint %, seed oil %e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding irrigation water with amount equal to 110% of soil moisture content of FC resulted in a significant increase in dry weight per plant, LAI, CGR and plant height, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, seed index, lint %, seed oil % , seed cotton yield , lint yield and oil yield compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egyptian cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 110% of field-capacity soil moisture significantly increased seed cotton, lint and oil yields.

Taxon
Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
Adding irrigation water with amount equal to 110% of soil moisture content of FCe0
Outcome
seed cotton yield , lint yield and oil yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding irrigation water with amount equal to 110% of soil moisture content of FC resulted in a significant increase in dry weight per plant, LAI, CGR and plant height, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, seed index, lint %, seed oil % , seed cotton yield , lint yield and oil yield compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egyptian cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–84 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · growth · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.