Paper · 2005 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF WATER STRESS AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZER LEVELS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF COTTON CULTIVAR GIZA 88

E. El-Sayed,

19
claims
48
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out at Sakha Agricultural Research Station during 2002 and 2003 seasons of the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.). The aim of this investigation was to study the effect of water stress and potassium fertilization levels on growth, earliness and seed cotton yield as well as its components. A split plot design with four replication was used. The main plots was assigned to water stress treatments (irrigation intervals) i.e. irrigation every two weeks, every three weeks and every four weeks. Three potassium levels i.e. 0, 24 and 48 K2O/feddan was assigned in the sub plots. The nitrogen fertilizer was 60 kg/fed. for all treatments. The results of this experiments indicated that irrigation interval every two weeks increased final plant height, number of the internodes main stem, both sympodial and monopodial branches, total dry weight number of open and unopen bolls, boll weight, lint % and seed cotton yield per both plant and feddan, while it decreased main stem internode length. Number of days from sowing date to the first flower appearance and the first boll craking were significantly decreased as the irrigation intervals increased. Earliness percentage was significantly increased by increasing irrigation intervals while position of the first sympodium was not affected by irrigation intervals. Leaf area was significantly increased as irrigation intervals decreased up to two weeks. With respect to potassium levels the results indicated that plant height, number of internodes per plant, internode length, numbers of monopodia/branch per plant, lint percentage and seed index were insignificantly affected by K rates in the two seasons. On the other hand, number of sympodium per plant, total dry weight per plant, leaf area, numbers of open and unopen boll per plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield per plant and per feddan were significantly increased by increasing potassium fertilizer rates from 24 up to 48 kg K2O/fed. The interaction between irrigation intervals and potassium fertilizer levels had significant effect on total dry weight, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield per plant and seed cotton yield per feddan only in 2002 season. The greatest values of these traits were obtained from the irrigation every two weeks and potassium fertilization at 48 kg K2O/fed. Seasonal consumptive use incubic meters per feddan and water use efficiency were decreased by expanding the irrigation intervals. On the other hand, consumptive use of water was decreased by increasing potassium fertilizer levels while use of efficiency was increased in the two seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every two weeks increased final plant height, number of main-stem internodes and sympodial and monopodial branches in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
irrigation interval every two weekse1
Outcome
final plant height, number of the internodes main stem, both sympodial and monopodial branchese2
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation interval every two weeks increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–789 · show in text ↑
e2

“final plant height, number of the internodes main stem, both sympodial and monopodial branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every two weeks increased total dry weight, number of open and unopen bolls and boll weight in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
irrigation interval every two weekse1
Outcome
total dry weight number of open and unopen bolls, boll weighte2
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation interval every two weeks increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–789 · show in text ↑
e2

“total dry weight number of open and unopen bolls, boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every two weeks increased lint percentage and seed cotton yield per plant and per feddan.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
irrigation interval every two weekse1
Outcome
lint % and seed cotton yield per both plant and feddane2
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation interval every two weeks increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–789 · show in text ↑
e2

“lint % and seed cotton yield per both plant and feddan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every two weeks decreased main-stem internode length in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
irrigation interval every two weekse1
Outcome
main stem internode lengthe2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation interval every two weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–779 · show in text ↑
e2

“it decreased main stem internode length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Days from sowing to first flower and to first boll cracking were significantly decreased as irrigation intervals increased.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
irrigation intervals increasede1
Outcome
Number of days from sowing date to the first flower appearance and the first boll crakinge1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Number of days from sowing date to the first flower appearance and the first boll craking were significantly decreased as the irrigation intervals increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Earliness percentage was significantly increased by increasing irrigation intervals.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
increasing irrigation intervalse1
Outcome
Earliness percentagee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Earliness percentage was significantly increased by increasing irrigation intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Position of the first sympodium was not affected by irrigation intervals.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
irrigation intervalse1
Outcome
position of the first sympodiume1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“position of the first sympodium was not affected by irrigation intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area was significantly increased as irrigation intervals decreased up to two weeks.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
irrigation intervals decreased up to two weekse1
Outcome
Leaf areae1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf area was significantly increased as irrigation intervals decreased up to two weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, number of internodes per plant and internode length were insignificantly affected by potassium rates in the two seasons.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
K ratese1
Outcome
plant height, number of internodes per plant, internode lengthe2
Direction
insignificantly affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“insignificantly affected by K rates in the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1716 · show in text ↑
e2

“plant height, number of internodes per plant, internode length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Numbers of monopodia per plant, lint percentage and seed index were insignificantly affected by potassium rates.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
K ratese1
Outcome
numbers of monopodia/branch per plant, lint percentage and seed indexe1
Direction
insignificantly affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“numbers of monopodia/branch per plant, lint percentage and seed index were insignificantly affected by K rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of sympodia per plant, total dry weight per plant and leaf area were significantly increased by raising potassium from 24 to 48 kg K2O/fed.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
increasing potassium fertilizer rates from 24 up to 48 kg K2O/fede1
Outcome
number of sympodium per plant, total dry weight per plant, leaf areae2
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
24e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly increased by increasing potassium fertilizer rates from 24 up to 48 kg K2O/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–2003 · show in text ↑
e2

“number of sympodium per plant, total dry weight per plant, leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Numbers of open and unopen bolls per plant and boll weight were significantly increased by raising potassium from 24 to 48 kg K2O/fed.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
increasing potassium fertilizer rates from 24 up to 48 kg K2O/fede1
Outcome
numbers of open and unopen boll per plant, boll weighte2
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
24e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly increased by increasing potassium fertilizer rates from 24 up to 48 kg K2O/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–2003 · show in text ↑
e2

“numbers of open and unopen boll per plant, boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1807–1861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield per plant and per feddan were significantly increased by raising potassium from 24 to 48 kg K2O/fed.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
increasing potassium fertilizer rates from 24 up to 48 kg K2O/fede1
Outcome
seed cotton yield per plant and per feddane2
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
24e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly increased by increasing potassium fertilizer rates from 24 up to 48 kg K2O/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–2003 · show in text ↑
e2

“seed cotton yield per plant and per feddan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–1905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of irrigation intervals and potassium levels significantly affected total dry weight, number of open bolls per plant and boll weight, only in 2002.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
interaction between irrigation intervals and potassium fertilizer levelse1
Outcome
total dry weight, number of open bolls/plant, boll weighte1

Not reportedComparatorDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“The interaction between irrigation intervals and potassium fertilizer levels had significant effect on total dry weight, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2005–2165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of irrigation intervals and potassium levels significantly affected seed cotton yield per plant and per feddan, only in the 2002 season.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
interaction between irrigation intervals and potassium fertilizer levelse1
Outcome
seed cotton yield per plant and seed cotton yield per feddane2
Qualifier
only in 2002 seasone2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“The interaction between irrigation intervals and potassium fertilizer levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2005–2081 · show in text ↑
e2

“seed cotton yield per plant and seed cotton yield per feddan only in 2002 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2167–2247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest values of these traits came from irrigation every two weeks with potassium at 48 kg K2O/fed.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
irrigation every two weeks and potassium fertilization at 48 kg K2O/fede1
Outcome
greatest values of these traitse1
Direction
greateste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greatest values of these traits were obtained from the irrigation every two weeks and potassium fertilization at 48 kg K2O/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2249–2379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal consumptive use and water use efficiency were decreased by expanding the irrigation intervals.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
expanding the irrigation intervalse1
Outcome
Seasonal consumptive use incubic meters per feddan and water use efficiencye1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seasonal consumptive use incubic meters per feddan and water use efficiency were decreased by expanding the irrigation intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2381–2509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consumptive use of water was decreased by increasing potassium fertilizer levels.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
increasing potassium fertilizer levelse1
Outcome
consumptive use of watere1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“consumptive use of water was decreased by increasing potassium fertilizer levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2530–2610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency was increased by potassium fertilizer levels in the two seasons.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
increasing potassium fertilizer levelse1
Outcome
use of efficiencye2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 88 (Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing potassium fertilizer levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2572–2610 · show in text ↑
e2

“use of efficiency was increased in the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2617–2667 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · growth · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

potassium · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.