Paper · 2012 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF POTASSIUM FORMS AND METHODS OF APPLICATION ON COTTON VARIETY GIZA 80

SANAA G. GEBALY

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at Sids Agricultural Research station, Beni-Suef Governorate in 2009 and 2010 seasons, to study the effect of the potassium sulfate and potassium humate on Egyptian cotton cultivar, Giza 80 (G. barbadense L.). The aim was to investigate the effect of two concentrations of soil potassium humate (80 %) with rate of 4 and 6 kg / fed. and foliar application of potassium humate with 2 and 3 g / L. sprayed at pinhead square, start of flowering and peak of flowering stages, on growth, leaf nutrient contents, earliness, seed cotton yield and yield components. The obtained results could be summarized as follows: Foliar application of potassium humate produced the highest values of leaf N, K, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu ppm, contents as compared with the other treatments. All treatments led to significant increase of leaf macro and micronutrients contents compared with the control treatment, but values of leaf P % and Mg % content were not significantly increased. All treatments significant increase of leaves content of chlorophyll a, b, (a + b) and carotenoids. The highest seed cotton yield / fed. and yield components showed significant increase in the application of soil potassium humate (4 kg / fed. + spraying cotton plants potassium humate 2 g / L.). The application of potassium humate significantly increased number of fruiting branches, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield / fed., oil % and protein % in seeds of cotton as compared with the control treatment in both seasons. Various treatments had insignificant effects on lint %, earliness % and fiber quality in both seasons. Key words: potassium sulfate, potassium humate, Growth, leaf nutrient, yield and yield components, oil, protein.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar potassium humate gave the highest leaf N, K, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu contents.

Taxon
G. barbadense L.e0
Material
Giza 80e0
Treatment
Foliar application of potassium humatee1
Outcome
leaf N, K, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu ppm, contentse1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton cultivar, Giza 80 (G. barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–247 · show in text ↑
e1

“Foliar application of potassium humate produced the highest values of leaf N, K, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu ppm, contents as compared with the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All potassium treatments significantly increased leaf macro- and micronutrient contents compared with control.

Taxon
G. barbadense L.e0
Treatment
All treatmentse1
Outcome
leaf macro and micronutrients contentse1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Verbatim

e0

“G. barbadense L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–246 · show in text ↑
e1

“All treatments led to significant increase of leaf macro and micronutrients contents compared with the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf P and Mg contents did not increase significantly under the treatments.

Taxon
G. barbadense L.e0
Outcome
leaf P % and Mg % contente1
Direction
not significantly increasede1

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“G. barbadense L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–246 · show in text ↑
e1

“values of leaf P % and Mg % content were not significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments significantly increased leaf chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids.

Taxon
G. barbadense L.e0
Treatment
All treatmentse1
Outcome
leaves content of chlorophyll a, b, (a + b) and carotenoidse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“G. barbadense L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–246 · show in text ↑
e1

“All treatments significant increase of leaves content of chlorophyll a, b, (a + b) and carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil potassium humate at 4 kg/fed and foliar humate at 2 g/L gave the highest seed cotton yield and yield components.

Taxon
G. barbadense L.e0
Treatment
soil potassium humate (4 kg / fed. + spraying cotton plants potassium humate 2 g / L.)e1
Outcome
seed cotton yield / fed. and yield componentse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“G. barbadense L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–246 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest seed cotton yield / fed. and yield components showed significant increase in the application of soil potassium humate (4 kg / fed. + spraying cotton plants potassium humate 2 g / L.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium humate significantly increased fruiting branches, open bolls, boll weight, and seed cotton yield relative to control.

Taxon
G. barbadense L.e0
Treatment
application of potassium humatee1
Outcome
number of fruiting branches, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield / fed.e1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Verbatim

e0

“G. barbadense L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–246 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of potassium humate significantly increased number of fruiting branches, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield / fed., oil % and protein % in seeds of cotton as compared with the control treatment in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium humate significantly increased cottonseed oil and protein percentages relative to control.

Taxon
G. barbadense L.e0
Treatment
application of potassium humatee1
Outcome
oil % and protein % in seeds of cottone1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Verbatim

e0

“G. barbadense L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–246 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of potassium humate significantly increased number of fruiting branches, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield / fed., oil % and protein % in seeds of cotton as compared with the control treatment in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments had no significant effects on lint percentage, earliness percentage, or fiber quality.

Taxon
G. barbadense L.e0
Treatment
Various treatmentse1
Outcome
lint %, earliness % and fiber qualitye1
Direction
insignificant effectse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“G. barbadense L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–246 · show in text ↑
e1

“Various treatments had insignificant effects on lint %, earliness % and fiber quality in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1651 · show in text ↑

Gossypium hirsutum · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

potassium · quality: protein · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

potassium · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.