Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Production

Effect of Nano-Fertilizer (Lithovit) and Potassium on Leaves Chemical Composition of Egyptian Cotton Under Different Planting Dates.

A. Attia; M. El-Hendi; S. Hamoda; et al.

18
claims
37
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at El-Gemmeiza Agricultural Research Station, El-Gharbia Governorate in 2014 and 2015 seasons, to study the effect of nano-fertilizer (Lithovit) rates (0, 2.5, 5 and 7.5 g/l) and foliar potassium fertilizer (in the form of Potasin-P) rates (2.5, 5 and 7.5 cm3/l) under three planting dates (8 April, 8 May and 8 June) on leaves chemical composition of the Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.), cultivar Giza 86. Cotton plants were foliar sprayed with Lithovit and Potasin-P at 45 and 60; 46 and 61 days after planting, respectively. Leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates contents were significantly affected by planting date in both seasons, in favour of early planting date (8 April) compared to medium and late planting dates (8 May and 8 June). Delaying planting date significantly increased leaf proline content and leaf peroxidase activity which indicate the presence of heat stress effect on the plant.Leaves N, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates contents were significantly affected by rates of Potasin-P in both seasons, in favour of the medium rate of Potasin-P (5cm3/l). While, leaves P and K contents were significantly increased by using the high rate of Potasin-P (7.5cm3/l). The medium rate of Potasin-P (5cm3/l) significantly decreased leaf proline content and peroxidase activity which indicate favorable plant conditions.Leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates contents were significantly increased by each increment of nano-fertilizer (Lithovit). The inverse was true in leaf proline content and peroxidase activity. The decrease in these traits induced favorable plant conditions and reflected on reduce environmental stress effect.The second order interaction had a significant effect on all studied chemical composition of leaves. Cotton plants sown on 8 April and sprayed with 5cm3 Potasin-P /l and 7.5 g Lithovit/l recorded the highest values of N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates content in leaves. In the contrary, this interaction recorded the lowest values of leaf proline content and peroxidase activity which induced favorable plant conditions and reflect on reduce environmental stress effect. It can be concluded that the mentioned interaction was the recommended treatment for optimum chemical composition of cotton leaves under experimental conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting (8 April) gave higher leaf N, P and K contents than later planting dates.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
planting datee2
Outcome
Leaves N, P, Ke2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Comparator
medium and late planting dates (8 May and 8 June)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates contents were significantly affected by planting date in both seasons, in favour of early planting date (8 April) compared to medium and late planting dates (8 May and 8 June)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting (8 April) gave higher leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll than later planting dates.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
planting datee2
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophylle2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Comparator
medium and late planting dates (8 May and 8 June)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates contents were significantly affected by planting date in both seasons, in favour of early planting date (8 April) compared to medium and late planting dates (8 May and 8 June)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting (8 April) gave higher leaf carotenoids and total carbohydrates than later planting dates.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
planting datee2
Outcome
carotenoids and total carbohydratese2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Comparator
medium and late planting dates (8 May and 8 June)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates contents were significantly affected by planting date in both seasons, in favour of early planting date (8 April) compared to medium and late planting dates (8 May and 8 June)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying planting significantly increased leaf proline content and peroxidase activity, indicating heat stress.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
Delaying planting datee3
Outcome
leaf proline content and leaf peroxidase activitye3
Direction
significantly increasede3
Qualifier
indicate the presence of heat stress effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e3

“Delaying planting date significantly increased leaf proline content and leaf peroxidase activity which indicate the presence of heat stress effect on the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The medium Potasin-P rate (5 cm3/l) gave higher leaf N, chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b than other rates.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
rates of Potasin-Pe4
Outcome
N, chlorophyll a, be4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Qualifier
in favour of the medium rate of Potasin-P (5cm3/l)e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“Leaves N, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates contents were significantly affected by rates of Potasin-P in both seasons, in favour of the medium rate of Potasin-P (5cm3/l)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The medium Potasin-P rate (5 cm3/l) gave higher leaf total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates than other rates.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
rates of Potasin-Pe4
Outcome
total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydratese4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Qualifier
in favour of the medium rate of Potasin-P (5cm3/l)e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“Leaves N, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates contents were significantly affected by rates of Potasin-P in both seasons, in favour of the medium rate of Potasin-P (5cm3/l)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The high Potasin-P rate (7.5 cm3/l) significantly increased leaf P and K contents.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
high rate of Potasin-P (7.5cm3/l)e5
Outcome
leaves P and K contentse5
Direction
significantly increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“While, leaves P and K contents were significantly increased by using the high rate of Potasin-P (7.5cm3/l)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The medium Potasin-P rate (5 cm3/l) significantly decreased leaf proline content and peroxidase activity, indicating favourable plant conditions.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
medium rate of Potasin-P (5cm3/l)e6
Outcome
leaf proline content and peroxidase activitye6
Direction
significantly decreasede6
Qualifier
indicate favorable plant conditionse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e6

“The medium rate of Potasin-P (5cm3/l) significantly decreased leaf proline content and peroxidase activity which indicate favorable plant conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Each increment of Lithovit nano-fertilizer significantly increased leaf N, P and K contents.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
each increment of nano-fertilizer (Lithovit)e7
Outcome
Leaves N, P, Ke7
Direction
significantly increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e7

“Leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates contents were significantly increased by each increment of nano-fertilizer (Lithovit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Each increment of Lithovit nano-fertilizer significantly increased leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
each increment of nano-fertilizer (Lithovit)e7
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophylle7
Direction
significantly increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e7

“Leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates contents were significantly increased by each increment of nano-fertilizer (Lithovit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Each increment of Lithovit nano-fertilizer significantly increased leaf carotenoids and total carbohydrates.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
each increment of nano-fertilizer (Lithovit)e7
Outcome
carotenoids and total carbohydratese7
Direction
significantly increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e7

“Leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates contents were significantly increased by each increment of nano-fertilizer (Lithovit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each increment of Lithovit nano-fertilizer decreased leaf proline content and peroxidase activity.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
each increment of nano-fertilizer (Lithovit)e7
Outcome
leaf proline content and peroxidase activitye0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e7

“Leaves N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates contents were significantly increased by each increment of nano-fertilizer (Lithovit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1645 · show in text ↑
e0

“The inverse was true in leaf proline content and peroxidase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1715 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The second-order interaction of planting date, Potasin-P and Lithovit had a significant effect on all studied leaf chemical composition.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
second order interactione1
Outcome
all studied chemical composition of leavese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“The second order interaction had a significant effect on all studied chemical composition of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–1932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton sown on 8 April and sprayed with 5 cm3 Potasin-P/l and 7.5 g Lithovit/l recorded the highest leaf N, P and K values.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
sown on 8 April and sprayed with 5cm3 Potasin-P /l and 7.5 g Lithovit/le0
Outcome
N, P, Ke0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cotton plants sown on 8 April and sprayed with 5cm3 Potasin-P /l and 7.5 g Lithovit/l recorded the highest values of N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates content in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–2150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton sown on 8 April and sprayed with 5 cm3 Potasin-P/l and 7.5 g Lithovit/l recorded the highest leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll values.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
sown on 8 April and sprayed with 5cm3 Potasin-P /l and 7.5 g Lithovit/le0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophylle0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cotton plants sown on 8 April and sprayed with 5cm3 Potasin-P /l and 7.5 g Lithovit/l recorded the highest values of N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates content in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–2150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton sown on 8 April and sprayed with 5 cm3 Potasin-P/l and 7.5 g Lithovit/l recorded the highest leaf carotenoids and total carbohydrates.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
sown on 8 April and sprayed with 5cm3 Potasin-P /l and 7.5 g Lithovit/le0
Outcome
carotenoids and total carbohydratese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cotton plants sown on 8 April and sprayed with 5cm3 Potasin-P /l and 7.5 g Lithovit/l recorded the highest values of N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates content in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–2150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton sown on 8 April and sprayed with 5 cm3 Potasin-P/l and 7.5 g Lithovit/l recorded the lowest leaf proline content and peroxidase activity.

Taxon
Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
sown on 8 April and sprayed with 5cm3 Potasin-P /l and 7.5 g Lithovit/le0
Outcome
leaf proline content and peroxidase activitye1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cotton plants sown on 8 April and sprayed with 5cm3 Potasin-P /l and 7.5 g Lithovit/l recorded the highest values of N, P, K, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and total carbohydrates content in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–2150 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the contrary, this interaction recorded the lowest values of leaf proline content and peroxidase activity which induced favorable plant conditions and reflect on reduce environmental stress effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2152–2351 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the combined treatment is the recommended treatment for optimum chemical composition of cotton leaves.

Treatment
the mentioned interactione0
Outcome
optimum chemical composition of cotton leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It can be concluded that the mentioned interaction was the recommended treatment for optimum chemical composition of cotton leaves under experimental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2353–2513 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.