Paper · 2024 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Morphophysiological and biochemical responses of cotton ( Gossypium barbadense L.) to nano zinc (ZnO-NPs) and Azospirillum sp. under water deficit stress conditions

Hossam S. El-Beltagi; Essam Abdelaziz El-Waraky; Hayfa Habes Almutairi; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Water deficit stress (WDS) is one of the most significant abiotic limiting factors in cultivated crops, including cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.). With global climate change and the destruction of ecological balance, the frequency and severity of drought events are increasing in many regions around the world. Therefore, the aim of the present work was to investigate the potential of using nano zinc particles (ZnO-NPs), plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (Azospirillum sp.), and their combination to mitigate the negative impacts of WDS on cotton var. Giza 96. Extended irrigation intervals of 30 and 45 days led to considerable decreases in plant height, chlorophyll content, relative water content (RWC), yield, and cotton fiber quality compared to the optimal irrigation interval (every 15 days). When applied individually or in combination, ZnO-NPs and Azospirillum sp. can ameliorate the negative effects of WDS on cotton growth and productivity. Overall, the use of Azospirillum sp. and ZnO-NPs, either individually or in combination, has demonstrated their potential to enhance cotton growth and yield parameters (plant height, dry weight, leaf area, chlorophyll pigment, seed index, seed yield, and lint%) under prolonged irrigation intervals during 2021 and 2022 seasons. Antioxidant enzymes activity comprising catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and proline content were increased under drought stress. Cotton fiber quality parameters including length, strength, and micronaire were insignificantly affected under low irrigation rate. The combination of ZnO-NPs and Azospirillum sp. provided the most effective mitigation of WDS during both experimental seasons, outperforming the effects of individual applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extended irrigation intervals of 30 and 45 days decreased plant height, chlorophyll content and relative water content in cotton compared with a 15-day interval.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
Extended irrigation intervals of 30 and 45 dayse1
Outcome
plant height, chlorophyll content, relative water content (RWC)e1
Direction
decreasese1
Comparator
optimal irrigation interval (every 15 days)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Extended irrigation intervals of 30 and 45 days led to considerable decreases in plant height, chlorophyll content, relative water content (RWC), yield, and cotton fiber quality compared to the optimal irrigation interval (every 15 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extended irrigation intervals of 30 and 45 days decreased cotton yield and fiber quality compared with a 15-day interval.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
Extended irrigation intervals of 30 and 45 dayse1
Outcome
yield, and cotton fiber qualitye1
Direction
decreasese1
Comparator
optimal irrigation interval (every 15 days)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Extended irrigation intervals of 30 and 45 days led to considerable decreases in plant height, chlorophyll content, relative water content (RWC), yield, and cotton fiber quality compared to the optimal irrigation interval (every 15 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO-NPs and Azospirillum sp. ameliorate the negative effects of water deficit stress on cotton growth and productivity, individually or in combination.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
ZnO-NPs and Azospirillum sp.e2
Interactor
Azospirillum sp.Azospirillume2symbiont
Outcome
cotton growth and productivitye2
Direction
amelioratee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“When applied individually or in combination, ZnO-NPs and Azospirillum sp. can ameliorate the negative effects of WDS on cotton growth and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum sp. and ZnO-NPs enhance plant height, dry weight and leaf area of cotton under prolonged irrigation intervals.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
Azospirillum sp. and ZnO-NPse3
Interactor
Azospirillum sp.Azospirillume3symbiont
Outcome
plant height, dry weight, leaf areae3
Direction
enhancee3
Setting
2021 and 2022 seasonse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Overall, the use of Azospirillum sp. and ZnO-NPs, either individually or in combination, has demonstrated their potential to enhance cotton growth and yield parameters (plant height, dry weight, leaf area, chlorophyll pigment, seed index, seed yield, and lint%) under prolonged irrigation intervals during 2021 and 2022 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum sp. and ZnO-NPs enhance chlorophyll pigment of cotton under prolonged irrigation intervals.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
Azospirillum sp. and ZnO-NPse3
Interactor
Azospirillum sp.Azospirillume3symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll pigmente3
Direction
enhancee3
Setting
2021 and 2022 seasonse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Overall, the use of Azospirillum sp. and ZnO-NPs, either individually or in combination, has demonstrated their potential to enhance cotton growth and yield parameters (plant height, dry weight, leaf area, chlorophyll pigment, seed index, seed yield, and lint%) under prolonged irrigation intervals during 2021 and 2022 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum sp. and ZnO-NPs enhance seed index, seed yield and lint percentage of cotton under prolonged irrigation intervals.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
Azospirillum sp. and ZnO-NPse3
Interactor
Azospirillum sp.Azospirillume3symbiont
Outcome
seed index, seed yield, and lint%e3
Direction
enhancee3
Setting
2021 and 2022 seasonse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Overall, the use of Azospirillum sp. and ZnO-NPs, either individually or in combination, has demonstrated their potential to enhance cotton growth and yield parameters (plant height, dry weight, leaf area, chlorophyll pigment, seed index, seed yield, and lint%) under prolonged irrigation intervals during 2021 and 2022 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased antioxidant enzyme activity (CAT, POD, PPO) in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
drought stresse4
Outcome
Antioxidant enzymes activitye4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Antioxidant enzymes activity comprising catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and proline content were increased under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1445 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased proline content in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
drought stresse4
Outcome
proline contente4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Antioxidant enzymes activity comprising catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and proline content were increased under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1445 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton fiber quality parameters (length, strength and micronaire) were not significantly affected under low irrigation rate.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
low irrigation ratee5
Outcome
fiber quality parameters including length, strength, and micronairee5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Cotton fiber quality parameters including length, strength, and micronaire were insignificantly affected under low irrigation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of ZnO-NPs and Azospirillum sp. gave the most effective mitigation of water deficit stress in cotton in both seasons, outperforming individual applications.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
combination of ZnO-NPs and Azospirillum sp.e6
Interactor
Azospirillum sp.Azospirillume6symbiont
Outcome
mitigation of WDSe6
Direction
outperforminge6
Comparator
individual applicationse6
Setting
both experimental seasonse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The combination of ZnO-NPs and Azospirillum sp. provided the most effective mitigation of WDS during both experimental seasons, outperforming the effects of individual applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1759 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–82 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.