Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted at Nubariya Research Station, Cotton Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center Giza, Egypt during the two summer growing seasons, 2017 and 2018. The aim of the present investigation was to study the effect of bio-fertilization Cyanobacteria extract, plant Growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) extract and Tea compost, nano-fertilization (NPK mixing) and their combination among 50% nano fertilization+ PGPR extract, 50%Nano fertilizers+ tea compost, 50% Nano +Cyanobacteria extract and 50% Nano+ PGPR extract+ tea compost+ Cyanobacteria extract and untreated one (control) on growth, seed yield , lint yield , and fiber properties of Egyptian cotton Giza 94 cultivar. The most important results can be summarized as follows: the combined treatment which contains half dose of both the nano-fertilizer and the some biofertilizers gave the highest values for, i.e. plant height (cm), number of fruiting branches per plant, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight (gm), lint percentage, seed index, seed cotton yield (Kentar/fed.), lint cotton yield (Kantar/fed.), micronaire value, fiber maturity ratio (MR), upper half mean (UHM)mm, fiber uniformity index (UI), and fiber strength (g/tex), followed by the treatment of 100% nano then the recommended dose of mineral fertilizer NPK. On the other hand, the lowest values of all the above traits, were recorded from the half does of nano NPK fertilizer in 2017 and 2018 seasons, respectively .While, There were no significant differences between the means of the fiber elongation % due to the treatments applied during the study in 2017 season .It's worthily to mention that, the percentage of fiber elongation had no constant trend due to fertilizer transactions applied on the adopted genotype during` 2018 season. But, it seems to be that nano-fertilizer is boosting the fiber elongation percent.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
The combined half-dose nano-fertilizer and biofertilizer treatment gave the highest plant height and counts of fruiting branches and open bolls.
- Taxon
- Egyptian cotton
.jpg?width=60)
Gossypium barbadensee0 - Material
- Giza 94 cultivare0
- Treatment
- combined treatment which contains half dose of both the nano-fertilizer and the some biofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- plant height (cm), number of fruiting branches per plant, number of open bolls per plante1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Setting
- Egypte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Egyptian cotton Giza 94 cultivar”
e1“the combined treatment which contains half dose of both the nano-fertilizer and the some biofertilizers gave the highest values for, i.e. plant height (cm), number of fruiting branches per plant, number of open bolls per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined half-dose fertilizer treatment gave the highest boll weight, lint percentage, and seed index.
- Taxon
- Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadensee0
- Material
- Giza 94 cultivare0
- Treatment
- combined treatment which contains half dose of both the nano-fertilizer and the some biofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- boll weight (gm), lint percentage, seed indexe1
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Egyptian cotton Giza 94 cultivar”
e1“combined treatment which contains half dose of both the nano-fertilizer and the some biofertilizers gave the highest values for, i.e. plant height (cm), number of fruiting branches per plant, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight (gm), lint percentage, seed index”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined half-dose fertilizer treatment gave the highest seed cotton yield and lint cotton yield.
- Taxon
- Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadensee0
- Material
- Giza 94 cultivare0
- Treatment
- combined treatment which contains half dose of both the nano-fertilizer and the some biofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- seed cotton yield (Kentar/fed.), lint cotton yield (Kantar/fed.)e1
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Egyptian cotton Giza 94 cultivar”
e1“combined treatment which contains half dose of both the nano-fertilizer and the some biofertilizers gave the highest values for, i.e. plant height (cm), number of fruiting branches per plant, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight (gm), lint percentage, seed index, seed cotton yield (Kentar/fed.), lint cotton yield (Kantar/fed.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined half-dose fertilizer treatment gave the highest micronaire value, fiber maturity ratio, and upper half mean.
- Taxon
- Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadensee0
- Material
- Giza 94 cultivare0
- Treatment
- combined treatment which contains half dose of both the nano-fertilizer and the some biofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- micronaire value, fiber maturity ratio (MR), upper half mean (UHM)mme1
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Egyptian cotton Giza 94 cultivar”
e1“combined treatment which contains half dose of both the nano-fertilizer and the some biofertilizers gave the highest values for, i.e. plant height (cm), number of fruiting branches per plant, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight (gm), lint percentage, seed index, seed cotton yield (Kentar/fed.), lint cotton yield (Kantar/fed.), micronaire value, fiber maturity ratio (MR), upper half mean (UHM)mm”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined half-dose fertilizer treatment gave the highest fiber uniformity index and fiber strength.
- Taxon
- Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadensee0
- Material
- Giza 94 cultivare0
- Treatment
- combined treatment which contains half dose of both the nano-fertilizer and the some biofertilizerse2
- Outcome
- fiber uniformity index (UI), and fiber strength (g/tex)e1
- Direction
- higheste2
- Comparator
- 100% nanoe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Egyptian cotton Giza 94 cultivar”
e1“fiber uniformity index (UI), and fiber strength (g/tex), followed by the treatment of 100% nano then the recommended dose of mineral fertilizer NPK”
e2“the combined treatment which contains half dose of both the nano-fertilizer and the some biofertilizers gave the highest values”
Claim · model-written summary
Across the listed traits, 100% nano fertilizer ranked after the combined treatment and before the recommended mineral NPK dose.
- Taxon
- Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadensee0
- Treatment
- 100% nanoe1
- Outcome
- followed by the treatment of 100% nanoe1
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Comparator
- recommended dose of mineral fertilizer NPKe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Egyptian cotton Giza 94 cultivar”
e1“followed by the treatment of 100% nano then the recommended dose of mineral fertilizer NPK”
Claim · model-written summary
Half-dose nano NPK fertilizer gave the lowest values for all the listed growth, yield, and fiber traits in 2017 and 2018.
- Taxon
- Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadensee0
- Treatment
- half does of nano NPK fertilizere1
- Outcome
- all the above traitse1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Qualifier
- 2017 and 2018 seasonse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Egyptian cotton Giza 94 cultivar”
e1“the lowest values of all the above traits, were recorded from the half does of nano NPK fertilizer in 2017 and 2018 seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Fiber elongation did not differ significantly among fertilizer treatments in 2017.
- Taxon
- Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadensee0
- Treatment
- treatments appliede1
- Outcome
- fiber elongation %e1
- Direction
- no significant differencese1
- Qualifier
- 2017 seasone1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Egyptian cotton Giza 94 cultivar”
e1“There were no significant differences between the means of the fiber elongation % due to the treatments applied during the study in 2017 season”
Claim · model-written summary
Fiber elongation showed no constant trend across fertilizer treatments in 2018.
- Taxon
- Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadensee0
- Outcome
- percentage of fiber elongatione1
- Qualifier
- 2018 seasone1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Egyptian cotton Giza 94 cultivar”
e1“the percentage of fiber elongation had no constant trend due to fertilizer transactions applied on the adopted genotype during` 2018 season”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors tentatively interpreted nano-fertilizer as boosting fiber elongation percentage.
- Taxon
- Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadensee0
- Treatment
- nano-fertilizere1
- Outcome
- fiber elongation percente1
- Direction
- boostinge1
- Qualifier
- it seems to bee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Egyptian cotton Giza 94 cultivar”
e1“it seems to be that nano-fertilizer is boosting the fiber elongation percent”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · quality: grain · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
nanoparticle · quality: grain · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
nanoparticle · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.