Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Protection Research

Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma harzianum against soybean charcoal rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina

Nima Khaledi; Parissa Taheri

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
94
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Throughout the world, charcoal rot, caused by Macrophomina phaseolina, is one of the most destructive and widespread diseases of crop plants such as soybean. In this study, the biological control capability of 11 Trichoderma spp. isolates against M. phaseolina was investigated using screening tests. Among all the tested Trichoderma spp. isolates, inhibition varied from 20.22 to 58.67% in dual culture tests. Dual culture, volatile and non-volatile tests revealed that two isolates of Trichoderma harzianum (including the isolates T7 and T14) best inhibited the growth of M. phaseolina in vitro. Therefore, these isolates were selected for biocontrol of M. phaseolina in vivo. The results of greenhouse experiments revealed that disease severity in the seed treatment with T. harzianum isolates was significantly lower than that of the soil treatment. In most of the cases, though, soil treatment with T. harzianum resulted in higher plant growth parameters, such as root and shoot weight. The effects of T. harzianum isolates on the activity of peroxidase enzyme and phenolic contents of the soybean root in the presence and absence of M. phaseolina were determined in greenhouse conditions. Our results suggested that a part of the inhibitory effect of T. harzianum isolates on soybean charcoal rot might be related to the indirect influence on M. phaseolina. Plant defense responses were activated as an elicitor in addition to the direct effect on the pathogen growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma isolate inhibition of M. phaseolina ranged from 20.22 to 58.67% in dual culture.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinat0pathogen
Outcome
inhibitione0
Value
20.22 to 58.67%e0

Not reportedSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inhibition varied from 20.22 to 58.67% in dual culture tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–419 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean charcoal rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 and T14 were the best inhibitors of pathogen growth in vitro across three tests.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
T7 and T14e0
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of M. phaseolinae0
Direction
best inhibitede0
Setting
in vitroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two isolates of Trichoderma harzianum (including the isolates T7 and T14) best inhibited the growth of M. phaseolina in vitro.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with T. harzianum gave significantly lower disease severity than soil treatment.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
seed treatment with T. harzianum isolatese0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinat0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
soil treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease severity in the seed treatment with T. harzianum isolates was significantly lower than that of the soil treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean charcoal rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of T. harzianum produced greater root and shoot weight in most cases.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
soil treatment with T. harzianume0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root and shoot weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil treatment with T. harzianum resulted in higher plant growth parameters, such as root and shoot weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest indirect effects and activated plant defenses contributed to charcoal rot inhibition.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibitory effect of T. harzianum isolates on soybean charcoal rote0
Qualifier
Plant defense responses were activatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a part of the inhibitory effect of T. harzianum isolates on soybean charcoal rot might be related to the indirect influence on M. phaseolina. Plant defense responses were activated as an elicitor in addition to the direct effect on the pathogen growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1483 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma harzianum · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · Macrophomina phaseolina · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · Macrophomina phaseolina · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.