Paper · 2016 · Experimental Agriculture

YIELD PERFORMANCE, CARBON ASSIMILATION AND SPECTRAL RESPONSE OF TRITICALE TO WATER STRESS

LAWRENCE MUNJONJI; KINGSLEY K. AYISI; BRAM VANDEWALLE; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Water stress is arguably the most limiting factor affecting cereal productivity in the world and its effects are likely to increase due to climate change. It is therefore imperative to have a wide-ranging understanding of water stress effects on crop physiological processes so as to better manage, improve and adapt crops to future climates. A field study was carried out to investigate the influence of four moisture levels on the following: (1) flag leaf CO 2 assimilation and flag leaf carbon content; (2) the utility of flag leaf spectral reflectance to monitor leaf water status and as an indicator of biomass and grain yield; and (3) biomass and grain yield performance of four spring triticale genotypes in a dry winter environment (steppe, arid climate). The experiment was carried out in a factorial arrangement of four moisture levels and four spring type triticale genotypes). Soil moisture level significantly influenced biomass accumulation, grain yield, CO 2 assimilation, flag leaf carbon content and spectral reflectance. Grain yield levels ranged from 0.8 to 3.5 t ha −1 in 2013 and 1.8 to 4.9 t ha −1 in 2014. CO 2 assimilation was significantly higher under well-watered (WW) conditions (9.92 µmol m −2 s −1 in 2013; 11.64 µmol m −2 s −1 in 2014) and decreased gradually with moisture level to 1.82 and 4.74 µmol m −2 s −1 under severe stress (SS) in 2013 and 2014, respectively. Flag leaf carbon content was significantly higher under water limited conditions compared to WW. Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Normalised Difference Water Index (NDWI) and Water Index (WI) were significant and positively correlated to biomass and grain yield. WI was particularly strongly correlated to biomass (0.72***) and grain yield (0.55***). However, no clear varietal effects were detected. This study revealed that carbon tends to accumulate in flag leaves under water stress and that flag leaf carbon content is influenced more by the export capacity of the flag leaves than on CO 2 assimilation rate. WI was found to be superior index in monitoring water stress in triticale compared to NDVI and NDWI. Above all, spring triticale proved to be adaptable to steppe (dry) climate of Limpopo and that livestock farmers in the province can successfully grow triticale for silage under MS conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture significantly influenced biomass, yield, assimilation, carbon content and reflectance.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
biomass accumulation, grain yield, CO 2 assimilatione0
Setting
Soil moisture levele0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil moisture level significantly influenced biomass accumulation, grain yield, CO 2 assimilation, flag leaf carbon content and spectral reflectance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale grain yield ranged from 0.8 to 3.5 t ha −1 in 2013.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Value
0.8 to 3.5 t ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield levels ranged from 0.8 to 3.5 t ha −1 in 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale grain yield ranged from 1.8 to 4.9 t ha −1 in 2014.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Value
1.8 to 4.9 t ha −1e0

Not reportedOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1.8 to 4.9 t ha −1 in 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 assimilation was higher when well watered and declined with water stress.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
well-watered (WW) conditionse0
Outcome
CO 2 assimilatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
severe stress (SS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 assimilation was significantly higher under well-watered (WW) conditions (9.92 µmol m −2 s −1 in 2013; 11.64 µmol m −2 s −1 in 2014) and decreased gradually with moisture level to 1.82 and 4.74 µmol m −2 s −1 under severe stress (SS) in 2013 and 2014, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1406 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf carbon content was significantly higher under water limitation.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
water limited conditionse0
Outcome
Flag leaf carbon contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
WWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flag leaf carbon content was significantly higher under water limited conditions compared to WW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NDVI, NDWI and WI correlated positively with biomass and grain yield.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
biomass and grain yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Normalised Difference Water Index (NDWI) and Water Index (WI) were significant and positively correlated to biomass and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1683 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water Index correlated strongly with biomass and grain yield.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
strongly correlatede0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WI was particularly strongly correlated to biomass (0.72***) and grain yield (0.55***)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1771 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No clear varietal effects were detected.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
varietal effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no clear varietal effects were detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1821 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WI was superior to NDVI and NDWI for monitoring triticale water stress.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
monitoring water stresse0
Comparator
NDVI and NDWIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WI was found to be superior index in monitoring water stress in triticale compared to NDVI and NDWI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2036–2135 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude spring triticale can be grown for silage under moderate stress in Limpopo.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
grow triticale for silage under MS conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“livestock farmers in the province can successfully grow triticale for silage under MS conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2232–2328 · show in text ↑