Paper · 2013 · Acta Ecologica Sinica

Effects of waterlogging on the growth and physiological properties of juvenile oilseed rape

Zhang Shuji

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of waterlogging on the growth and physiological properties of juvenile oilseed rape( Brassica napus L cv. Zhongshuang No. 11). Waterlogging lasted 3 or more days significantly depressed the plant growth,which might be due to it decreased the chloroplast and photosynthetic pigment content,nitrogen uptake and utilization,and induced the oxidization of plant. The effects of waterlogging on juvenile oilseed rape growth is mainly attributed to its influence on the recovery process of physiological properties after flooding,which was prolonged with the period of waterlogging lasted,including the chloroplast and photosynthetic pigment content,nitrate reductase and antioxidant enzyme activities. Moreover,in photosynthetic pigment,the effect of waterlogging on the carotenoid content was more significant than chlorophyll content of juvenile oilseed rape.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging for at least three days significantly depressed plant growth.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
Waterlogging lasted 3 or more dayse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Waterlogging lasted 3 or more days significantly depressed the plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–260 · show in text ↑
t0

“oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased chloroplast and photosynthetic pigment content.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
waterloggingt1
Outcome
chloroplast and photosynthetic pigment contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased the chloroplast and photosynthetic pigment content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–346 · show in text ↑
t0

“oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–91 · show in text ↑
t1

“waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased nitrogen uptake and utilization.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
waterloggingt1
Outcome
nitrogen uptake and utilizatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen uptake and utilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–378 · show in text ↑
t0

“oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–91 · show in text ↑
t1

“waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer waterlogging prolonged recovery of physiological properties.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
recovery process of physiological propertiese0
Direction
prolongede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recovery process of physiological properties after flooding,which was prolonged with the period of waterlogging lasted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging affected carotenoid content more significantly than chlorophyll content.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
more significante0
Comparator
chlorophyll contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of waterlogging on the carotenoid content was more significant than chlorophyll content of juvenile oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–913 · show in text ↑

flooding · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

flooding · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 6 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.