Paper · 2013 · Acta Ecologica Sinica

Effects of waterlogging on the growth and physiological properties of juvenile oilseed rape

张树杰 ZHANG Shujie; 廖星 LIAO Xing; 胡小加 HU Xiaojia; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

通过盆栽试验研究了模拟渍水条件对苗期油菜(Brassica napus L.)中双11号生长及生理特性的影响。结果表明,渍水超过3 d就会显著抑制苗期油菜的生长,这与渍水降低油菜叶片叶绿体和光合色素含量、降低氮素吸收利用和引起过氧化胁迫有关。渍水后苗期油菜的生理恢复,无论是叶绿体和光合色素含量,还是硝酸还原酶及抗氧化酶活性的恢复均表现出一定的滞后性,而且渍水时间越长滞后期越长。此外,在苗期油菜叶片光合色素中,渍水对类胡萝卜素的影响要大于对叶绿素的影响。;A pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of waterlogging on the growth and physiological properties of juvenile oilseed rape (Brassica napus L cv. Zhongshuang No. 11). Waterlogging lasted 3 or more days significantly depressed the plant growth, which might be due to it decreased the chloroplast and photosynthetic pigment content, nitrogen uptake and utilization, and induced the oxidization of plant. The effects of waterlogging on juvenile oilseed rape growth is mainly attributed to its influence on the recovery process of physiological properties after flooding, which was prolonged with the period of waterlogging lasted, including the chloroplast and photosynthetic pigment content, nitrate reductase and antioxidant enzyme activities. Moreover, in photosynthetic pigment, the effect of waterlogging on the carotenoid content was more significant than chlorophyll content of juvenile oilseed rape.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging for at least three days significantly depressed juvenile oilseed rape growth.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Material
Zhongshuang No. 11e1
Treatment
Waterlogging lasted 3 or more dayse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Waterlogging lasted 3 or more days significantly depressed the plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“juvenile oilseed rape (Brassica napus L cv. Zhongshuang No. 11)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased chloroplast and photosynthetic pigment content.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
Waterlogginge2
Outcome
chloroplast and photosynthetic pigment contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it decreased the chloroplast and photosynthetic pigment content, nitrogen uptake and utilization, and induced the oxidization of plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“juvenile oilseed rape (Brassica napus L cv. Zhongshuang No. 11)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–412 · show in text ↑
e2

“Waterlogging lasted 3 or more days significantly depressed the plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased nitrogen uptake and utilization.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
Waterlogginge2
Outcome
nitrogen uptake and utilizatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it decreased the chloroplast and photosynthetic pigment content, nitrogen uptake and utilization, and induced the oxidization of plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“juvenile oilseed rape (Brassica napus L cv. Zhongshuang No. 11)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–412 · show in text ↑
e2

“Waterlogging lasted 3 or more days significantly depressed the plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging induced oxidation in juvenile oilseed rape.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
Waterlogginge2
Outcome
oxidization of plante0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“induced the oxidization of plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“juvenile oilseed rape (Brassica napus L cv. Zhongshuang No. 11)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–412 · show in text ↑
e2

“Waterlogging lasted 3 or more days significantly depressed the plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–489 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological recovery after flooding took longer with longer waterlogging duration.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
recovery process of physiological properties after floodinge0
Direction
prolongede0
Qualifier
chloroplast and photosynthetic pigment content, nitrate reductase and antioxidant enzyme activitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of waterlogging on juvenile oilseed rape growth is mainly attributed to its influence on the recovery process of physiological properties after flooding, which was prolonged with the period of waterlogging lasted, including the chloroplast and photosynthetic pigment content, nitrate reductase and antioxidant enzyme activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging affected carotenoid content more significantly than chlorophyll content.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
more significant thane0
Comparator
chlorophyll contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of waterlogging on the carotenoid content was more significant than chlorophyll content of juvenile oilseed rape.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1151 · show in text ↑

flooding · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

flooding · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 6 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.