Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Land productivity enhancement and soil health improvement in rainfed rice (Oryza sativa) farms of Odisha through integrated farming system

H.K. SAHOO; B. BEHERA; U.K. BEHERA; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field investigation was carried out at 5 clusters located in 5 different blocks viz. Khajuripada of Kandhamal dis- trict, Dhenkanal Sadar and Odapada of Dhenkanal district, Golamunda and Narla of Kalahandi District of Odisha, under rain-fed medium land situations across 20102013. The experiment aimed at comparing performance of pond based integrated farming system (IFS) model comprising rice (Oryza sativa L.)onion (Allium cepa L.) crop- ping system, pisciculture + on dyke plantation, poultry and mushroom with conventional cropping system of rice greengram (Vigna radiata L.) for system productivity and impact on soil health. The IFS model gave total system productivity of 31.92 tonnes rice equivalent yield (REY) as compared to 3.78 tonnes and net returns of 1,61,148 as compared to 11,631 under rainfed ricegreengram cropping system. There was decrease in bulk density, in- crease in soil pH, organic carbon, soil N, P and K status and increase in the population of heterotrophic bacteria, actinomycetes and Azotobacter compared to initial values.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated system produced 31.92 tonnes rice equivalent yield versus 3.78 tonnes for conventional cropping.

Treatment
IFS modele0
Outcome
total system productivitye0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
31.92 tonnese0
Comparator
3.78 tonnese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The IFS model gave total system productivity of 31.92 tonnes rice equivalent yield (REY) as compared to 3.78 tonnes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated system returned 1,61,148 versus 11,631 under conventional cropping.

Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1,61,148e0
Qualifier
11,631e0
Comparator
rainfed ricegreengram cropping systeme0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returns of 1,61,148 as compared to 11,631 under rainfed ricegreengram cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bulk density decreased under the integrated system versus initial values.

Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was decrease in bulk density, in- crease in soil pH, organic carbon, soil N, P and K status and increase in the population of heterotrophic bacteria, actinomycetes and Azotobacter compared to initial values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH, organic carbon and N, P and K status increased versus initial values.

Outcome
soil pH, organic carbon, soil N, P and K statuse0
Direction
in- creasee0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was decrease in bulk density, in- crease in soil pH, organic carbon, soil N, P and K status and increase in the population of heterotrophic bacteria, actinomycetes and Azotobacter compared to initial values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heterotrophic bacteria, actinomycetes and Azotobacter populations increased versus initial values.

Outcome
population of heterotrophic bacteria, actinomycetes and Azotobactere0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in the population of heterotrophic bacteria, actinomycetes and Azotobacter compared to initial values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 125 positive, 29 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.