Paper · 2016 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Effect of Trap Color, Height, and Orientation on the Capture of Yellow and Stick Tea Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Nontarget Insects in Tea Gardens

L. Bian; P. X. Yang; Y. J. Yao; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
27
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two thrips species-the yellow tea thrips ( Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood) and the stick tea thrips ( Dendrothrips minowai Priesner)-are serious pests affecting tea plants in southern China. Although the stick tea thrips is primarily restricted to southern China, the yellow tea thrips is gradually proliferating worldwide. Colored sticky card traps may be useful for monitoring and capturing these species, but a systematic analysis has not been conducted to identify the most effective trap color, height, and orientation. We performed indoor experiments using an orthogonal experimental design, as well as field tests in tea gardens, to identify the color most attractive to the two thrips species. Field tests were then conducted using color-optimized traps-lawngreen (RGB: 124, 252, 0) for yellow thrips and lime (RGB: 0, 255, 0) for stick tea thrips-to determine the most effective trap height and orientation. The greatest numbers of both yellow and stick tea thrips were captured on traps positioned 0-20 cm above the tea canopy in an east-west orientation. We also evaluated the performance of the color-optimized sticky card traps compared with commercially available yellow ones. Significantly more yellow and stick tea thrips and fewer natural enemies were captured on the color-optimized traps than on commercial ones. Although additional research is needed to explain the responses of the two different species and to increase trap effectiveness, our findings should assist in the control of these harmful insects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow tea thrips captures were greatest at 0–20 cm above the canopy in east-west orientation.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
traps positioned 0-20 cm above the tea canopy in an east-west orientatione0
Interactor
yellow tea thripse1peste0
Outcome
numbers of both yellow and stick tea thripse0
Direction
greateste0

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest numbers of both yellow and stick tea thrips were captured on traps positioned 0-20 cm above the tea canopy in an east-west orientation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yellow tea thrips ( Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stick tea thrips captures were greatest at 0–20 cm above the canopy in east-west orientation.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
traps positioned 0-20 cm above the tea canopy in an east-west orientatione0
Interactor
stick tea thripse0pest
Outcome
numbers of both yellow and stick tea thripse0
Direction
greateste0

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest numbers of both yellow and stick tea thrips were captured on traps positioned 0-20 cm above the tea canopy in an east-west orientation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized traps caught significantly more yellow tea thrips than commercial traps.

Taxon
tea plantst0
Treatment
color-optimized trapse0
Interactor
yellow tea thripse1peste0
Outcome
yellow and stick tea thripse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
commercial onese0

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly more yellow and stick tea thrips and fewer natural enemies were captured on the color-optimized traps than on commercial ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plants in southern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yellow tea thrips ( Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized traps caught significantly more stick tea thrips than commercial traps.

Taxon
tea plantst0
Treatment
color-optimized trapse0
Interactor
stick tea thripse0pest
Outcome
stick tea thripse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
commercial onese0

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly more yellow and stick tea thrips and fewer natural enemies were captured on the color-optimized traps than on commercial ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plants in southern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized traps caught fewer natural enemies than commercial traps.

Taxon
tea plantst0
Treatment
color-optimized trapse0
Interactor
natural enemiese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
natural enemiese0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
commercial onese0

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly more yellow and stick tea thrips and fewer natural enemies were captured on the color-optimized traps than on commercial ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plants in southern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · pest · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.