Paper · 2011 · Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis

Relationship between the damage degree of tea longhorn beetle larvae and the distances of tea clumps to trap lamp and roadside

Shang Song-qi

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To determine the effect of frequency-vibration trap lamp(FTL) on controlling TLB,tea longhorn beetle(Aeolesthes induta Newman),a case study was carried out on the relationship between TLB larvae damage degree and the distances of tea clumps to trap lamp(about 0-120 m) and to road side(about 0-250 m) in a tea garden in Cangnan County,Zhejiang Province.The result showed that 9.0% tea clumps,about 5 m close to FTL was damaged by TLB larvae,which was significantly lower than that(17.5%) of tea clumps about 20-50 m away from trap lamp;the clumps,about 50 m near to road side,was damaged by TLB larvae more seriously than that of far away from the road,the average injured rate was more than 20.0%;the clumps about 70 m away from road side was damaged lightly,the injured rate was less than 10.0%;approximately 30% injured rate was observed in the tea clumps where about 20 m farther away from trap lamp and about 50 m nearer to road side.The effect of FTL on controlling TLB was affected by two kinds of distances,in which the distance of tea clump to road side was major impact factor.FTL could control the damage of TLB larvae down to 10.0% where the clumps were 70 m farther away from road side and 5 m nearer to FTL.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea clumps about 5 m from the trap lamp had significantly lower TLB larval damage, 9.0%, than clumps 20-50 m away, 17.5%.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
about 5 m close to FTLe1
Interactor
TLBe1pest
Outcome
was damaged by TLB larvaee1
Direction
significantly lowere1
Value
9.0%e1
Qualifier
17.5%e1
Comparator
tea clumps about 20-50 m away from trap lampe1

Verbatim

e1

“The result showed that 9.0% tea clumps,about 5 m close to FTL was damaged by TLB larvae,which was significantly lower than that(17.5%) of tea clumps about 20-50 m away from trap lamp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–535 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea clumps about 50 m from the road were damaged more seriously by TLB larvae, with an average injured rate above 20.0%.

Taxon
teae0
Interactor
TLBe1pest
Outcome
injured ratee1
Direction
more seriouslye1
Value
more than 20.0%e1
Setting
road sidee1

Verbatim

e1

“the clumps,about 50 m near to road side,was damaged by TLB larvae more seriously than that of far away from the road,the average injured rate was more than 20.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–697 · show in text ↑
e0

“the distances of tea clumps to trap lamp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–253 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea clumps about 70 m from the road side had a low injured rate, below 10.0%.

Taxon
teae0
Outcome
injured ratee1
Direction
less thane1
Value
10.0%e1
Setting
road sidee1

Verbatim

e1

“the clumps about 70 m away from road side was damaged lightly,the injured rate was less than 10.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–796 · show in text ↑
e0

“the distances of tea clumps to trap lamp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Approximately 30% injured rate was observed in tea clumps about 20 m farther from the trap lamp and 50 m nearer the road.

Taxon
teae1
Outcome
injured ratee1
Value
approximately 30%e1
Qualifier
about 20 m farther away from trap lamp and about 50 m nearer to road sidee1

Verbatim

e1

“approximately 30% injured rate was observed in the tea clumps where about 20 m farther away from trap lamp and about 50 m nearer to road side”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–938 · show in text ↑
e0

“the distances of tea clumps to trap lamp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–253 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of the trap lamp on TLB control was affected by distances, and distance to the road was the major impact factor.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
FTLe1
Outcome
effect of FTL on controlling TLBe1
Setting
road sidee1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“The effect of FTL on controlling TLB was affected by two kinds of distances,in which the distance of tea clump to road side was major impact factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1086 · show in text ↑
e0

“the distances of tea clumps to trap lamp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The trap lamp could hold TLB larval damage down to 10.0% in clumps 70 m farther from the road and 5 m nearer the lamp.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
FTLe1
Interactor
TLBe1pest
Outcome
damage of TLB larvaee1
Direction
down toe1
Value
10.0%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“FTL could control the damage of TLB larvae down to 10.0% where the clumps were 70 m farther away from road side and 5 m nearer to FTL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1220 · show in text ↑
e0

“the distances of tea clumps to trap lamp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–253 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · pest · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.