Paper · 1961 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Emergence of Phorate-Treated Cotton Seed as Affected by Substrate Moisture and Temperature

Joseph Hacskaylo; C. D. Ranney

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Deltapine-15 cotton seed with and without prorate were planted in washed river sand at two moisture levels and four temperatures. Regardless of treatment, seedling emergence was favored by It moisture level of 50% of field capacity as compared with one of 75%. The final stand counts at 86° and 77° F, were comparable for the prorate-treated and untreated seed. Prorate, however, caused a marked reduction in the rate and total emergence at both 72° and 67°. A similar experiment with another lot of seed of the same variety showed that seedling emergence with and without prorate seed treatment were comparable at 80° and 67°. It was concluded that reduction in emergence in prorate-treated seed often found may be due to inferior quality of seed as well as to low temperatures and high levels of soil moisture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton seedling emergence was favored at 50% rather than 75% field capacity.

Material
Deltapine-15e1
Treatment
50% of field capacitye0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
favorede0
Comparator
75%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seedling emergence was favored by It moisture level of 50% of field capacity as compared with one of 75%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–260 · show in text ↑
e1

“Deltapine-15 cotton seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 86° and 77° F, final stand counts were comparable for treated and untreated cotton seed.

Material
Deltapine-15e1
Treatment
prorate-treatede0
Outcome
final stand countse0
Direction
comparablee0
Qualifier
86° and 77° Fe0
Comparator
untreated seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The final stand counts at 86° and 77° F, were comparable for the prorate-treated and untreated seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–361 · show in text ↑
e1

“Deltapine-15 cotton seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prorate reduced the rate of cotton emergence at 72° and 67°.

Material
Deltapine-15e1
Treatment
Proratee0
Outcome
ratee0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
72° and 67°e0
Comparator
without proratee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prorate, however, caused a marked reduction in the rate and total emergence at both 72° and 67°.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–458 · show in text ↑
e1

“Deltapine-15 cotton seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e2

“seed with and without prorate were planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prorate reduced total cotton emergence at 72° and 67°.

Material
Deltapine-15e1
Treatment
Proratee0
Outcome
total emergencee0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
72° and 67°e0
Comparator
without proratee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prorate, however, caused a marked reduction in the rate and total emergence at both 72° and 67°.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–458 · show in text ↑
e1

“Deltapine-15 cotton seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e2

“seed with and without prorate were planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In another seed lot, cotton emergence was comparable with and without prorate at 80° and 67°.

Material
Deltapine-15e1
Treatment
prorate seed treatmente0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
comparablee0
Qualifier
80° and 67°e0
Comparator
without proratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seedling emergence with and without prorate seed treatment were comparable at 80° and 67°.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–627 · show in text ↑
e1

“Deltapine-15 cotton seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest poor seed quality, low temperatures and high soil moisture may contribute to reduced emergence after prorate treatment.

Treatment
prorate-treated seede0
Outcome
reduction in emergencee0
Qualifier
inferior quality of seed as well as to low temperatures and high levels of soil moisturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduction in emergence in prorate-treated seed often found may be due to inferior quality of seed as well as to low temperatures and high levels of soil moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–811 · show in text ↑
e1

“Deltapine-15 cotton seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 39 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.