Paper · 2015 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Comparative efficacy of some insecticides for Thrips control in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)

Amit Kaushik; Sunil Kumar Yadav; P. S. Srivastava

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted to evaluate three combination viz., seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS + spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SL, seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS + spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SL, seed treatment with imidacloprid 17.8 SL + spray with thiamethoxam 30 FS and six insecticides alone viz., quinalphos, profenofos, azadirachtin, lambda-cyhalothrin, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid against thrips on cowpea. This indicated that seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS + spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SL, seed treatment with imidacloprid 17.8 SL + spray with thiamethoxam 30 FS and seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS + spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SL were the most effective treatments for the control of thrips in cowpea followed by thiamethoxam and imidacloprid alone. Whereas, effects of quinalphos, profenofos, azadirachtin and lambda-cyhalothrin did not show distinctive effect on the thrips population.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS plus spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SL was among the most effective treatments for thrips control in cowpea.

Treatment
seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS + spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SLe1
Interactor
thripsThripse1pest
Outcome
control of thripse1
Direction
most effectivee1
Comparator
thiamethoxam and imidacloprid alonee1
Setting
field studye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field study was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“This indicated that seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS + spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SL, seed treatment with imidacloprid 17.8 SL + spray with thiamethoxam 30 FS and seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS + spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SL were the most effective treatments for the control of thrips in cowpea followed by thiamethoxam and imidacloprid alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS plus spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SL was among the most effective treatments for thrips control in cowpea.

Treatment
seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS + spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SLe1
Interactor
thripsThripse1pest
Outcome
control of thripse1
Direction
most effectivee1
Comparator
thiamethoxam and imidacloprid alonee1
Setting
field studye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field study was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“This indicated that seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS + spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SL, seed treatment with imidacloprid 17.8 SL + spray with thiamethoxam 30 FS and seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS + spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SL were the most effective treatments for the control of thrips in cowpea followed by thiamethoxam and imidacloprid alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with imidacloprid 17.8 SL plus spray with thiamethoxam 30 FS was among the most effective treatments for thrips control in cowpea.

Treatment
seed treatment with imidacloprid 17.8 SL + spray with thiamethoxam 30 FSe1
Interactor
thripsThripse1pest
Outcome
control of thripse1
Direction
most effectivee1
Comparator
thiamethoxam and imidacloprid alonee1
Setting
field studye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field study was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“This indicated that seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS + spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SL, seed treatment with imidacloprid 17.8 SL + spray with thiamethoxam 30 FS and seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS + spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SL were the most effective treatments for the control of thrips in cowpea followed by thiamethoxam and imidacloprid alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam and imidacloprid used alone ranked next after the seed-and-spray combinations for thrips control in cowpea.

Treatment
thiamethoxam and imidacloprid alonee1
Interactor
thripsThripse1pest
Outcome
control of thripse1
Direction
followed bye1
Comparator
most effective treatmentse1
Setting
field studye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field study was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“This indicated that seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30 FS + spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SL, seed treatment with imidacloprid 17.8 SL + spray with thiamethoxam 30 FS and seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS + spray with imidacloprid 17.8 SL were the most effective treatments for the control of thrips in cowpea followed by thiamethoxam and imidacloprid alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quinalphos did not show a distinctive effect on the thrips population in cowpea.

Treatment
quinalphose2
Interactor
thripsThripse2pest
Outcome
thrips populatione2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of quinalphos, profenofos, azadirachtin and lambda-cyhalothrin did not show distinctive effect on the thrips population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profenofos did not show a distinctive effect on the thrips population in cowpea.

Treatment
profenofose2
Interactor
thripsThripse2pest
Outcome
thrips populatione2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of quinalphos, profenofos, azadirachtin and lambda-cyhalothrin did not show distinctive effect on the thrips population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin did not show a distinctive effect on the thrips population in cowpea.

Treatment
azadirachtine2
Interactor
thripsThripse2pest
Outcome
thrips populatione2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of quinalphos, profenofos, azadirachtin and lambda-cyhalothrin did not show distinctive effect on the thrips population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda-cyhalothrin did not show a distinctive effect on the thrips population in cowpea.

Treatment
lambda-cyhalothrine2
Interactor
thripsThripse2pest
Outcome
thrips populatione2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of quinalphos, profenofos, azadirachtin and lambda-cyhalothrin did not show distinctive effect on the thrips population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–932 · show in text ↑

thiamethoxam · Thrips · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

imidacloprid · Thrips · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

seed treatment · Thrips · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

application · Thrips · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.